• squirrel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It’s actually really simple. See… *unpacks a pile of books of advanced biology and genetics*

    Although… *gets another pile of books about psychology and neurology*

    And we have to consider… *drops another pile of books about sociology and anthropology*.

    Pretty obvious, isn’t it?

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 days ago

    I figure it is like football team supporters.

    Football isn’t real either. It’s a made up thing with made up rules and made up uniforms.

    But it someone tells you they support a team, you go, “OK”.

    Even if they are wearing the shirt of one team and say they support the other, “OK”.

    Maybe they don’t look like they support either team, stil,l “OK”.

  • First Majestic Comet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    You don’t really need to. All that matters is to respect how a person identifies.

  • djsoren19
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    See my gender is “bottom,” which means that anyone who has sex with me is a “top.” ez.

    • rose_eyeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      but what about those who dont have sex 😔

        • rose_eyeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          i dont think u intended that, but this comment sounds very acephobic. like we dont get genders bc genders are related to sex

    • glilimith
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sex is rooted in reality, but the boundaries are socially constructed.

      Similarly, Pluto is no longer a planet because “planet” is a socially constructed category. It doesn’t mean that it’s not rooted in tangible, factual reality, just that we culturally decide what characteristics are required to fall into the categories we created.

        • riwo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          biology is full of social constructs. reality is complex and messy, but to wrap their heads around it, humans put it into simple categories.

          the destinction into male and female (and sometimes intersex) was creared backwards. first came the social destinctions and social importans on sex, then people searched for the reasons, to explain the destinctions.

          through this they currently arrived at the definition of sex as biological organisms producing smaller or larger gametes. as if this were actually a super sensual to classify all organisms that produce larger gametes and all organisms that produce smaller gametes in the same categories respecrively. but fair enough.

          but then anything that causes an organism to produce smaller or larger gamets is considered sex determening. and all caused or just correlated to this is also considered part of the sex, including social factors. so production of larger gametes in humans is cause by xx chromosomes, so all humans with those chromosomes are female, even if they dont produce gametes, and everything caused by the xx chromosomes like homrones and phenotypes produced by those is considered female and even certain attributes pushed majority on people categorized as such are considered part of it. but none of that is a must. people with xx chromosomes dont necessairily produce larger gametes, they dont necessairily have the hormones, they dont necessairily develop the phenotypes, they arent necessairily shaped by the same way by the same social system. and yet we categorise them as the same sex and categorize their attributes as wrong. this shit is social

        • TGhost [She/Her]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          What do you mean then, in regards with the original meme ? That OP should ask to see everyone’s sex ?

          Thats transphobic

    • rose_eyeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      pretending that biology/science exists without the social constructs or biases is a fool’s errand. sex is as much of a real thing as the concept of species, its a generalized idea of something that cant be easily divided or distinguished based on really anything. its made to fit the social construct we already had, science didnt sprung out in an unbiased form and has not grown out of it. the distinction is flawed and done sometimes for ease and sanity; but a lot of times because of bias

    • Blazingtransfem98@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sex and gender aren’t the same thing though. They are different concepts. I mean I am a trans woman, I identify as and largely appear to be a woman, but my biology and how I was born is physically male. This doesn’t make me any less of a woman though.

        • Arkhive (they/she)M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Considering sex a binary is in fact a social construct. Intersex people exist, “male” seahorses get pregnant. Some frog species can changes sexes to help balance population. A universal biological sex binary is not what nature shows. Claiming such a binary exists is necessarily a social construct, or at least social simplification of reality. Much in the way saying one magnetic pole is positive and the other negative, or “spin” on electrons. They are all social constructs.

          The queerness of nature does not care about the mental gymnastics we humans have to jump through to try and make sense of things.

  • riwo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    how does one differentiate between man and woman? owo

  • gandalf_der_12te
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I have for some reason always felt that the meaning of the words “sex” and “gender” should be reversed.

    Maybe that is because Freud has called “any form of societal behavior” is a form of sexuality, as far as i remember.