Anti tankie sentiment has literally been a part of 196 culture for years 👁 👄 👁
she/her
Anti tankie sentiment has literally been a part of 196 culture for years 👁 👄 👁
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJvswDgw6DE
It’s at least one of the ways they move around! Look at him go !
If you don’t rock and stone you ain’t coming home!
Here’s a stackexchange convo about that which might interest you!
But yeah basically you can absolutely say breast if you want, it’s a thing already. Even if it wasn’t you could still just show the middle finger to conventions and say whatever you want
I’ve seen a couple of people say this now, so I will clarify that Ada did not open this community, SoleInvictus did! Ada did however feature it and make a post on the old 196 which lead here.
Edit: This was supposed to be a reply to Stovetop :P oh well
196 came into being on reddit long ago, and that is a cute (imo) holdover from then. The original community (195 I think) had 1 rule, post before you leave, and a second “rule”, include “rule” in the title as a reference to the 1 rule.
It’s not actually enforced of course, but it’s part of the 196 culture
please mark as nsfw 😳
Locking. This meme complains about misogyny, with people immediately jumping in to imply misogyny isn’t real and start complaining about irrelevant stuff to the meme in an inflammatory manner. Please behave in the future.
It certainly did a bunch of imperialism, yeah
You are using the term technically incorrectly :P
I’ve had piles of tankies try to convince me that the workers in China are in fact the ones in control of the government (no mention of the means of production though 🤔),
I was referring to this. If the workers in china were actually in control of the government (which they aren’t), and the businesses were controlled by the state (which quite a few of them are, but not all), then that would be a form of socialism.
As it stands however it’s a capitalist oligarchy.
I would also like to say that I’m not arguing for this specific implementation of socialism, I’m elaborating on what is required for socialism in reference to how a tankie might deluded themselves into thinking that china is communist.
Technically, a sufficiently democratic state would make the workers indirectly in control (or directly in a direct democracy) if the businesses are state owned. Would make them socialist however and not communist, but that might be a bit pedantic.
The soviet union had unions or just the one involuntary one if I remember correctly, but since it was essentially controlled by the state it wasn’t all that powerful. Cuba today does the same thing.
Should be noted that the soviet union was neither fascist nor communist. Fascism is a form of capitalism, and while many “communist states” (such as china) are capitalist, the SU had a planned economy.
I had one tankie try to convince me that since there was some limited workplace democracy in the SU this meant that workplaces were democratic, but if that is all that is required then I’m happy to announce that plenty of liberal democracies today are socialist.
Edit: oh woops the fascism vs planned economy thing was intended for another comment
amen. Socialism by definition requires the workers to own the means of production, and yet all the states they support again and again suppress unions and democracy. Rather tired of being associated with them just because people are confused about most political terms
Not quite right. Some other people cover the definition properly in this post.
Edit: Your comment is very wrong to be clear. Read this comment instead: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/21148571/12557557 and this one: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/21148571/12560912
Be sure to keep an eye on your smell as well! That and mental stuff were the first things I noticed