I like us building alternatives on the internet. The fediverse makes me hopeful again.
- 20 Posts
- 1.64K Comments
Does it need to be from a news article? Can it be personal news?
SoleInvictusto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Charging to tour rental properties...English3·23 hours agoThis is called tenency in common. I’m unaware of it being illegal in any states and a cursory search brought up nothing. Do you have any leads you can share?
SoleInvictusto politics @lemmy.world•President Trump on Texas map redistricting: ‘We are entitled to five more seats’4·1 day agoWhy wait until he’s dead? We’re entitled to shit on him now.
I nominate this to be the official mod response to transphobic commentary.
some areas that are just sea lice.
Uh oh!
SoleInvictusto Technology@programming.dev•He said, she said, it said: I used ChatGPT as a couple's counselor. How did we fare?English2·2 days agoTap for spoiler
Exactly what you’d think: getting a decent answer took more work than doing it yourself.
Ahh yes, this reminds me of my favorite bird, the Deepthroated Cockwomble.
SoleInvictusto A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world•This 81-year-old still works at Home Depot to support herself and her 90-year-old husband15·2 days agoDon’t forget that capitalism is literally the only viable economic system, full stop. Before its advent in 1463 by Bernard H. Capital, nothing worked, anywhere, for tens of thousands of years. The world was in turmoil. Cats associated freely with dogs, the Keebler elves were not properly enslaved, and humans lived on a diet of pine needles, grubs, and sea water. Pure madness.
SoleInvictusto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Recieved an ultra slim keyboard in a box big enough for a microwave oven (packing material in comment)English4·3 days agoYou’re totally right. I’m guessing it’s from Amazon, the company that thought sending us bulk bag breakfast cereal in an unpadded shipping bag was a good idea. We now have enough free corn flake breading for years, though!
SoleInvictusto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Recieved an ultra slim keyboard in a box big enough for a microwave oven (packing material in comment)English6·3 days agoThat label is only 5" square at most, though. You don’t need a microwave sized box for that.
SoleInvictusto Games@lemmy.world•The curse of ‘Disco Elysium’, the greatest RPG ever madeEnglish3·3 days agoNo no, you don’t get it. Every single person in the world must love it for it to be the greatest game. Until that day, they’re just pretenders.
/s
Username checks out.
#16 would be comical when it catches on a vertebra and bends. You don’t want it too thick, though, as the mechanism relies on the weight, angle, and relative thinness of the blade to slice through. I’d recommend 1/8" with a concrete cap for weight. I’m torn between 304 and 5160, though.
He’s just extra social. That’s gotta be it.
/s
All combatants recline and feign comfort while maintaining constant vigilance.
SoleInvictusto News@lemmy.world•New Ohio bill would create state registry of applicants who skip job interviews4·4 days agoOr lives in a high cost of living area. My parents own a house that looks like garbage and has primarily unfinished walls (they’re working on that) but is valued in excess of $1M because of the land.
SoleInvictusto Technology@lemmy.world•Enough of the billionaires and their big tech. ‘Frugal tech’ will build us all a better worldEnglish8·4 days agoMicroscopes are crucial for diagnosing infections but can cost millions of pounds, making them entirely inaccessible for many people across the globe.
Good article but this stood out as a massive exaggeration. They can cost millions, much like a car can cost millions, but I can pick up a microscope sufficient for most clinical laboratory work for around $200-300. A cheap epifluoresence microscope can be acquired for around $2k.
Still an inaccessible amount for many, but it’s several orders of magnitude cheaper.
I’m a big fig aficionado. This means your figs are ripe or close to ripe but are getting too much water. Err on the side of light underwatering and they won’t explode.
I see it now. I’m looking at tenancy in common based on the original comment, you (and presumably the previous commenter) are talking about unrelated occupancy provisions. One is about co-owning, the other is about cohabitating.
This is exactly why people DO use exact language, despite your utterly bizarre insistence otherwise - because those that don’t confuse the rest of us with their shitty communication.