• Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Also “processed” can often mean “making it fucking edible.”

    Wheat is a fine example, because while it is indeed edible raw, cooking or milling wheat makes it much more digestible.

    Some aspects of processed foods are just removing a step our body has to do to digest it (which requires energy).

    When you digest say, processed sugar, your body has to do almost nothing to digest it compared to complex carbohydrates.

    It’s a short-cut for your body to expend less energy while getting energy.

    (but that’s not always a good thing)

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s probably worth distinguishing between processed - which as you mentioned includes broad swathes of cooking - and ultra-processed, the McDonalds-tier of foods.

      The former is not particularly bad, while the latter is pretty bad.

      • serenissi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The arguments against ‘ultra processed’ food IMO are twofold. First, in some countries, additives are poorly regulated and enforced, hence food sometimes contains harmful substances. Though I think it it fairly rare.

        Second, most ‘ultra processed’ food in discussion are commercial fast food. Being ultra processed, they contain same energy and fat in less volume due to low indigestible junks. So people can eat them more. And due to over commercialization they are often made addictive with flavoring. This means you’ll binge eat and come for more. This over consumption of macro nutrients and sometimes elimination of micro nutrients due to cost effective processing makes what is unhealthy about such food.

        So if the production is honest about ingredients (verified by regulatory tests), you calculate your daily nutrients intake to be in recommended range and you don’t fall for addiction easily, go for any ultra super processed food, no harms done.

        (There are evidence of dietary fibers helping prevent certain types of colon cancers but unless you’re eating only sugar stuffs, most food in market contains enough of that, how much processed it be).

        • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          I recommend the book “The Hungry Brain” on this subject, which talks among other things about the things that eating excessive amounts of UPFs does to your brain.

          Fascinating read, truly.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m happy enough with “designed” in this sense – designed by random change and natural selection

        Not in any sense “designed” by anything that can plan

        • Walk_blesseD
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Idk, I guess the way I understand it the word implies intent.

      • irelephant 🍭@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        Shittily designed yes, but thats the nature of evolution. Now if you’d excuse me, I’m going to tear a ligament in my finger my moving it in a weird way.

        • Gormadt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Only if you excuse me for dislocating my shoulder because I slept with the wrong pillow

    • BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      You process food by washing, cutting, or cooking your food. Processed isn’t being used properly to scaremonge people. Over processed or ultra processed food is the worriesome stuff

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hmm I assume you bite the meat right off the pig/cow? You certainly wouldn’t process it with heat, that would be unnatural…

  • Floey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is not a proper dichotomy as organic isn’t about level of processing, it deals with farming conditions and species.

    Also processing a spectrum. For example a smoothie and juice are both processed fruit but the smoothie has everything that the whole foods have in it while the juice is missing some of the nutrients, notably the fiber. If you then add refined sugar to that juice to make it more palatable that is further processing, and if you reduce that juice to a jelly that is further processing, with each of these processing stages you are making the food more calorically dense. Processing can also make a food easier to eat or improve the nutrition though, processing isn’t inherently a good or bad thing but it very often is one of those.

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Your body has evolved to eat organic food. Processed food is engineered to be as cheap as possible to produce first, edible second and nutritional last.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Would need to be closer to early 1800’s because canning foods became popular around then. Canning included a lot of processing.

      There’s also the issue of pesticides which got their kickoff in the late 19th century and were in full swing use by the 1920’s.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        We didn’t get engineered edible oils (like canola) until the 1930s. Things didn’t get bad until engineered food

        • Snot Flickerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Things didn’t get bad until engineered food

          That’s literally ignoring pesticides which came first. My grandfather got Parkinsons from exposure to pesticides. Frankly, I probably will, too.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I somewhat agree with the people who say humanity’s biggest mistake was the invention of farming

            We were all so healthy before that Egyptian technology made it to Europe

            Ancient Greeks referred to the times before cities grew around farming areas as the golden age, when gods walked along men

  • i_dont_want_to
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I too am also going to take this meme super seriously raaaaaaaagh!!!

  • Chev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Opposite of processed food are raw ingredients

    Opposite of organic food is conventional food (that is usually sprayed on with chemicals to kill bugs)

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Organic food is literally designed for you to eat. Processed food turns your body into crap which will degrade into the ground sooner rather than later.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not a religious or health nut (although they are delicious) … my point is that the fewer steps your food has to take to get to you eating it is way better than most things you buy in a box/can/plastic container.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Processed food turns your body into crap which will degrade into the ground sooner rather than later.

      Tell that to Donald Trump. Some of the unhealthiest and most mentally unwell people live the longest.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Except he has doctors that most of us will never afford. They probably pump vitamins and young girls blood into his veins.

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        As far as evidence goes, this is not particularly compelling. It’s a bit like when someone has an anecdote of their chain-smoking 90-year old grandmother - yes, outliers exist, but at a population-level, both smoking and eating ultra-processed foods is not a good idea.

  • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    can’t speak for what everyone else is talking about all I know organic is just a bespoke waste of money in my books, take that lable off and the price drops ten to twenty percent for the same raw ingredients

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    this would have made sense… god, more than 50 thousand years ago, since even hunter-gatherers would have been going around selectively spreading only seeds from plants they liked.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      People haven’t been farming before 10,000 years ago

      With farming defined as deliberately selectively spreading seeds

      50k years ago people weren’t eating many plants at all due to the glaciers.