(she/her)

  • a very silly girlie in her toxic femininity era (but like, in a I-support-women’s-wrongs kinda way)
  • Butlerian jihadist (machines should not think!!;! BAD!!) (techbros plz face the wall 🥺)
  • I do a little fedposting, as a treat
  • anarchist (I need to believe a better world is possible)
  • 3 Posts
  • 406 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle




  • Walk_blesseDtoOglaf@midwest.socialShield Maiden
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes, I understand that there’s a lot of popular misconceptions regarding virginity and female genitalia and that my joke plays off of them. I am a woman and I don’t need this explained to me, thanks (though I suppose your contribution is helpful for anyone unaware of this).










  • Yes, and I still think that shitlordy behaviour of “teehee I didn’t technically break the rules-as-written despite it being blatantly obvious to everyone around that my intent was to do exactly that because I’m scared of getting a comment removed on the internet” is a pathetic display of weakness.

    Idk, I find all three alternatives preferable: either say the slur we all know you mean and just cop the consequences, be more creative with your insult game, or idk, maybe just don’t use cognitive impairments as a punching bag???





  • Why “regarded”? I don’t get it tbh. To me it just says that you want to call someone “retarded” but you’re just too much of a coward to commit. Like, it communicates the exact same contempt for someone’s cognitive abilities but also an aversion to using a proper No-No Word™ because you don’t wanna transgress some sorta social taboo against them while doing so. Cuck behaviour, ngl chief.