• Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    10 hours ago

    There was a theory that roughly 15 years after Roe v Wade crime started decreasing because people who weren’t ready for or didn’t want children could now have an abortion. Many of those kids that were previously born “unwanted” were in poor households and so the kids getting to about 15 years old in those conditions would start getting into trouble and start committing crimes.

    For any fuckwit that says “make better decisions then! Use protection!” I’m the result of a broken condom, that shit absolutely happens. I was a “pleasant surprise.” Honestly I wish they’d have just had the abortion.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      It doesn’t get brought up because it’s not useful to anyone politically. Already support abortion rights? Well then lower crime rates is just a positive unintended side effect of a policy that grants women their inherent right to bodily autonomy. Already oppose abortion rights? Then you probably don’t care about crime rates because you already think that abortion itself is a crime.

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      My sister had her first child because her birth control failed due to another medication making it less effective.

      No one warned her about that being a thing that can happen with that particular med. Not her doctor. Not the pharmacist. No one said a thing… which is super fucked up. She was married at the time, but still. They were not ready for a kid(their words)

      This was almost 20 years ago so I don’t remember which med it was, and I’m hoping the medical community is better about this now.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I think it’s fine to have kids if you want them but the government trying to get people to have more kids for economic reasons is sickening

    • UNY0N@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      And what then, the human race just dies out? I get the pessimistic feeling, but we may very well be the only sapient species in this galaxy. It would be such a waste to just give up and perish because of momentary hardships.

      We are literally sapient stardust, and I’m certainly not going to give up and throw away the efforts and struggles on millions of ancestors just because of some current corporate greed and fascism is in fashion.

      • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        We are in no way at risk of dying out from negative population growth. If we start to go down below a few million, then maybe let’s talk.

        World population is still increasing, and is set to maybe stabilize in a couple decades. Fingers crossed. If we could (gently, without mass starvation) reduce the population down to a more sustainable level, that is an unmitigatedly good thing.

        What might kill us is infertility from pollution or disease, but this won’t do it.

        • MBM@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          gently, without mass starvation

          Even more gently if you want to make sure there’s enough younger people to care for the elderly

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            A fuckton of people work bullshit jobs that should not exist. We could run the same society with much, much less people working.

        • Lowpast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          The real issue is that we have a rapidly aging workforce and there’s not enough young people to replace them. With the average age of parents raising, the gap is getting larger. In the 50s it was 16 workers for every 1 retired. The 70s, 5:1. That number is now almost 2:1. This is bad. Very bad.

          Higher bar for jobs. Lower wage for entry level. Later retiring age. Higher need for migrant and seasonal workers.

          • LazerFX@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Aw, crapitalism will break because line cannot always go up.

            Cry me a fucking river. Humanity is a cancer, and we need to be about half our current population. Yeah, we’re not gonna like it when we drop that population. Our kids, my daughter, are going to have it fucking tough. But if we want to survive long term… We gotta stop.

        • UNY0N@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I totally agree with you. I just hate all of these “don’t have kids” arguments from liberal people. It’s not a viable solution, because the fascists and the idiots are gong to have kids. We need at least some sane people to continue on.

          But the is all emotional and subjective, I’ll admit that. I’m not really thinking about this topic with a clear head anymore.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        10 hours ago

        We’re upright locusts. Stop stroking your ego and look at the state of the world. Humanity doesn’t justify itself.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Why would I care if the human race dies out? I won’t be here to notice.

        Let’s instead focus on not burning the place to the ground during our lifetimes.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Oh come on, it’s a #notallmen moment. Lol

        When people say “stop having kids”, what they mean is stop having unplanned pregnancies. I don’t think that many people want our literal extinction.

        • UNY0N@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I understand that, I’m very aware that my reaction is emotional and subjective. I’m just sick of reading that sentence over and over and over again.

      • aoidenpa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I don’t share this view. Life is an interesting pattern created by matter, but no need to be spiritual about it. If life ceased to exist, no one would be sad about it. Actually a lot of struggle and pain would be over which is positive in my opinion. In practice, we should value quality of life of conscious beings instead of quantity. Having less is better.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      “Driven” suggest more than half of total pregnancies, which is not true looking at the graph given above. It was solidly thirdfourth* in terms of totals, which is still unsettling, but not as pronounced as your comment suggests.

      *I overlooked 25-29

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Who told you that drivers have to be 51%?

        That’s not what a driver is. Driver is a general term, ten pregnancies are a driver of total birth rate, as they have impacted total fertility significantly.

          • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Yes. For example, 60 million people in the US (less than 20% of our total population) is a significant amount of people.

            • Ech@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              The amount the percentage represents is irrelevant. A billion people could be involved, but if the total is 7 billion, it’s not going to be a significant part of the total trend.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Don’t worry, Republicans will solve this by banning abortion and birth control nationwide!

    They are always thinking of the children.

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Not to call out OP, but does anyone have this information in anything other than .png format? There’s no timestamps, hyperlinks, or citations anywhere here. I’d love to send this to other people, but I’m not about to copy-pasta something that could be old or inaccurate.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It was never about stopping abortion. It’s about keeping people in poverty and creating a cycle of uneducated voters that either don’t vote or vote Republican because they don’t know better

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    What do you know. If it takes two people to pay the rent them two people have to work to pay the rent…

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      While true, this is mostly about teen pregnancy. So it’s moreso that things like education, easy access to contraception, legalizing abortion, etc. were the primary drivers. Not to worry though, the supreme court and fascists are working hard to reverse all that. We need poor children to feed the machine