• Rufus Q. Bodine III@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 minutes ago

    Surely, the difference will be donated to a fire victims fund. In this way, landlord steals from the rich to redistribute to the poor.

  • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    In a capitalist society, raising prices on victims due to supply and demand is rational behavior.

    The problem here is less with the landlord and more with the system we live in. It motivates everyone to have antisocial behavior.

      • Prime_Minister_Keyes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 minutes ago

        Sartre seems to agree, kind of: “I was not the one to invent lies: they were created in a society divided by class and each of us inherited lies when we were born. It is not by refusing to lie that we will abolish lies: it is by eradicating class by any means necessary.”

    • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I agree that the system we live in is partially responsible, but it has never motivated me to be a piece of shit. People are still responsible for their actions.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        We don’t know what situation the landlord is in. Maybe they are also turbo fucked. The human instinct to survive is strong.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is America! It’s not a horrific tragedy with lives lost, many others seriously injured or afflicted with new long-term health problems, their most precious possessions reduced to ash, countless people being made homeless with absolutely no options for places to go… it’s an opportunity!

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You’re fucking cuckoo if you don’t think this is illustrative of a larger action that has/will also “trickle down” to the renters in studio apartments - “I came here to exploit human tragedy for profit and chew bubble gum… and I can’t chew bubble gum with this mouth full of caviar” -landlords in LA right now

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    How can people afford this? To meet the 3x gross income requirement you’d need an income of $14,995 * 12 * 3 = $539,820. At that point you might as well just buy a house instead of renting.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Because this isn’t for individuals. Corporations rent houses like this. Movie studios, music labels, executive perks for the c suite, and more recently YouTube streamer companies. When you have clients that need to travel a lot it’s offered as a perk for them to “live” in one of these fancy houses. Executives who only stay with companies for a few years are easier to recruit if they don’t have to hassle with buying or selling a home during a relocation. Or in the modern times YouTubers who need to a fancy house to stream from for content.

      Rental costs are expenses, owning is a taxable asset.

    • Catoblepas
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The Palisades (where the largest fire is burning right now) house some of the wealthiest people in the country that just lost homes worth over $3 million on average. It’s scummy (maybe illegal?) to jack the prices up and these people are also rich enough to pay it, for the most part.

      The other fires going on are a different story, but the address is near the Palisades without being in the danger zone.

    • nalinna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      That assumes someone will give you a mortgage and that you have multiple thousands of dollars saved up for closing costs, which unfortunately is the reason people are forced to look for rentals and are greeted with…that.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That’s true for a lot of folks, but if you can manage 15k/month rent, then you absolutely have financial options and easily get savings.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      California is super expensive because everyone makes a lot of money compared to other state medians.

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If anyone has access to a genie wish, might I suggest:

    “I wish any rental that saw the rent on it raised by more than twice the inflation rate, once it is no longer occupied, would instantly burst into flames and burn to ashes in a way that damages no other rental unit.”

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Granted, landlords insurance pays for a new building and lost rent. Now renting it for even more money.

        • SoleInvictus
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The fire just never goes out. Engineers eventually harness it for nearly limitless power.

          Landlord still profits.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Maybe for the first few, but after awhile it would be common knowledge that raising rents too much magically causes building to burst into flames. Insurance doesn’t cover intentional acts. If you deliberately burn your own house down, insurance isn’t going to cover that. Plus every insurance policy would exclude coverage for this sort of entirely predictable and preventable fire.