• 4 Posts
  • 940 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 18th, 2024

help-circle
  • I suppose I was, specifically because “hard to explain” isn’t one of it’s weaknesses. It has legitimate problems, such as concentrating wealth, destroying the environment (even economic textbooks admit this) and worsening mental health. Some of the issues with capitalism go away if you didn’t need* to interact with it to survive in countries where it is in use.

    The main problem I have with most of the alternatives is that they increase reliance on the government and rarely allow for “industrial” tools (family heirlooms) to be enjoyed and modified by descendents. I guess a better way of phrasing my complaint would be that non capitalist societies can exists within a capitalist system in at least one area however doing the opposite is generally impossible.




  • as much as capitalism has it’s flaws, it is easier to explain than most other systems because it is just the natural extension of “I aquired this fur pelt and will defend it” just with a mandatory insurance scheme (government police/laws/military) and more distributed wealth (fractional ownership).

    Obviously it is far from the best system, but the core idea is simple: I OWN objects, the object can be any size or value irrespective of it’s usefulness to others. It is a system that benefits those with resources at the expense of those that can hardly afford to revolt.

    Now explaining the overreach of the government from a capitalist perspperspective is an actually difficult task.












  • For the first point I would imagine that relying on the host computer to transmit the data by opening cmd or powershell could work on Windows, however the cost of adding the necessary intelligence into millions of keyboards would probably not be worth it and the limited communication from the host to the Keyboard would be a challenge (capslock, NumLock, Scrollock).