Populism Updates @PopulismUpdates Tell me your most radical position that cannot be placed on the left-right political spectrum

Admiral Snaccbar @Chris Mench Serving shrimp with the tail still on when it’s already mixed into something (pasta, rice, etc) is insane.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    2 months ago

    When driving you are making things more dangerous and less efficient by waving people in. If it is your right of way take it.

    Be predictable, not polite.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Almost got into an accident last night on this. Car 1 stopped at a 4way to my right, Car 2 opposite me stopped, then I stopped. Distinctly. Whole ass seconds between all stops. Me and 2 are waiting for 1 to go. It’s 11:00pm. I can’t say for sure, but I just KNOW Car 1 was waving his hands at us, who can’t see through his windshield because that’s how night time works. Way too much time passes, and me and 2 are like, fuck it and start going, then 1 flashes his brights and goes narrowly missing both of us. Was he just really wanting to be an a car accident? Is he drunk? Who knows, but half the accidents I’ve narrowly avoided involve a 4 way stop and an idiot.

    • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Misunderstanding “right of way” is half the problem.

      Right of way is ability to make a road, or the road itself by extension. You can’t have the right of way - it’s usually the government’s - and you can’t give it away. This is why wording is consistently who must yield the right of way, and not who has the right of way.

      If it’s a driver’s turn to act, they are obligated to act. It’s not their option or right to act.

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve usually heard “right of way” used in terms of sense 3 of the dictionary. I’ve never heard it used to refer to the ability to make a road – that just makes me think you have a skilled construction crew on speed dial.

        • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Dictionaries list common usage - even if incorrect. Look up the definition of right of way for your state or other government and I’m certain it will be the thing on which you travel or the right to create and manage it, not your “rights” while traveling on it.

          I couldn’t find a list of all definitions by state but the three states I checked all use that.

          It would be weird if they didn’t, since that’s been the term since before automobiles existed: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_way

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Indeed, in the boating world, the words are “stand-on” or “burdened” vessel, which makes it clear that the vessel that should continue its course has the obligation to do so under the collision regulations. The “give way” vessel should alter its course or intentions to “keep clear.” Nobody — nobody! — has the “right of way.”

    • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I point this out to my kids on a regular basis. My oldest is 15 and about to get his license. I tell him that cars being polite are being dicks to those behind them.

      Your quote is the exact quote I say to him.

    • CoolMatt@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      In my city there is a very popular good samaritan trap on the main drag into town, and I am waiting for the day something nasty happens at that particular parking lot entrance, so then they maybe redesign that section of the street or something.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I first thought you were talking about waving to pedestrians to cross when you stop to let them go. Which (edit: stopping and waiting) is a correct and expected behaviour, afaik

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Stopping for pedestrians at cross walks is correct, but you should never be waving at anyone to go.

        When you wave at people to go they are less likely to check that the other lanes are safe for them to cross. You stop and look right at them so they know you see them and wait until they go on their own.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s fine. That’s telling a pedestrian you have seen them and are obeying the rules of the road. That’s reasonable.

  • ruckblack@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah I’ve never understood if they expect me to just eat the tail, or start playing with my pasta with my hands to pull them off. Certainly not gonna waste like half my shrimp by just cutting the meat where the tail starts.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Oh yes sure please make my comfort food more difficult to eat thanks”

      I’m right there with you. Serving shrimp tail-on might as well be serving something on a log instead of a plate.

    • SouthFresh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 months ago

      Assert dominance by eating as per normal and when you encounter a tail, spit it at the chef.

          • Screamium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh trust me, I don’t need the extra awkwardness!

            Chef: (Still holding towel after wiping 13 shrimp tail shells off his face) Back again?!

            Me: (Awkwardly hovering in the doorway) Yeah sorry, I was going back and forth on this but I found a shell piece all by itself with no shrimp in it and while I have no reason to put it in my mouth I figured I needed to show conviction to impress my date so… PATOOIE

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        My dad leaves the shell fully on as a stand-alone appetizer of grilled shrimp, so the shrimp is entirely covered in shell. It took until the third time my ex had dinner there for him to ask why the shrimp was so crunchy and for me to realize I’d forgotten to warn him.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      Press the very start of the tail with your fork sideways so it’s cut, then pull the shrimp from the tail with the fork and knife.

      Anyway, the post is right, it’s borderline violent insanity.

      • ruckblack@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah but that’s such a fiddly process. I’ve sprayed pasta and sauce all over the table because my knife or fork slipped trying to do surgery on my food

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t get when a fancy restaurant does it. If it’s not a Cajun boil or similar vibe, please don’t try to make me look polite deconstructing seafood.

      • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Great! My fork slipped while trying to perform this insane feat of dexterity and my shrimp flew across the restaurant!

    • JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was on a school trip to a hotel, and was handed some dragon fruit. They didn’t tell me how to eat it, so I bit right into it. Took out a big chunk and wanting to try something new I kept chewing it.

      The man had a look of what was a mix between horror and surprise on his face and told me to spit it out.

      Not really a plate but I was handed something with inedible parts and no instructions. Similar I suppose?

    • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not sure if this is a thing everywhere, but a lot of bakeries around here will serve baked goods on a plate with a napkin under the baked goods. Not a big problem with things like croissants, but when cakes and stuff with sticky bottoms are served like this, it drives me insane. Both the purpose of the napkin and the plate has been defeated.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fun fact: The original purpose of parsley on a plate was that it was there for you to eat. Specifically there for you to eat at the end of a meal as a breath freshener.

    • exasperation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Skewers and other utensils are obviously OK. Some parts of natural foods can sometimes act like skewers or utensils, too, so that just becomes a normal part of the presentation and eating method. Like cocktail shrimp should still have the tails on, as a little handle.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      When I was a little kid, I ate one of those red peppers at a Chinese restaurant. I didn’t know that you were supposed to pick them out. This probably explains my love of spicy food.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You were supposed to not eat those? Well, I figured, I’m not obligated to eat everything if I want less spicy, but I never thought that those are decorative

    • Bob@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wouldn’t say insane but that’s defo against the rules for me. I often have chefs who want us to leave the bellybuttons on cherry tomatoes and I get this mildly niggling feeling because I read a few years ago that they’re poisonous.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        They’re not. Trust me, my niece ate almost nothing except grape/cherry tomatoes for the first 4 years of her life, she’d never have made it. I’ve personally eaten whole cherry tomatoes more days than I haven’t in the last month and I feel great.

      • QualifiedKitten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Can you direct me to any sort of source on that? I did a brief search, and I see some information about toxins found in tomato plants in general, (mostly stems, leaves, and green/unripe tomatoes), but nothing that specifically discusses a higher concentration in the “belly button” (I assume you mean the core/where the stem connects?) vs. the rest of the fruit.

        • Bob@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well like I say, I just read it somewhere a few years ago, and I’ve just had a brief search myself and found the same thing as you basically.

      • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        On cherry tomatoes they’re so tiny it doesn’t really matter. You can even eat the stems in larger tomatoes once in a while (though it tastes bad), the amount of solanine left is miniscule. On ripe tomatoes that is.

        • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          In my case, I think it’s because when my siblings and I were kids, we only got to eat the tail because my parents wouldn’t get shrimp for us but for themselves and then not eat the tail which we would.

          I mean, I am insane, but that’s not why.

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I have no opinion on eating the tail of the shrimp with the rest of it. The concept of ordering or cooking shrimp, eating the flesh, and then giving someone else the tail is absolutely INSANE to me. It sounds like a bit from a sitcom.

          • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            2 months ago

            …I didn’t even know eating the tail was an option. Like, it’s pure fucking chitin - there’s nothing to emulsify. It’s like trying to eat a fingernail, or piece of plastic.

            Squeezing that last little nub of meat out of it, yeah, but the tail itself? Dafuq?

            Or are we talking about that little nub of meat tucked away in the chitin hole? Just realized we might be calling two different things the ‘tail’.

            • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              No, the thread is about the crunchy bit. With cocktail shrimp I find it’s better to squeeze the meat out but when the shrimp is cooked and covered in sauce a lot of times I just find it less of a pain to get the meat out alone (especially if they leave the whole shell on after removing only the head and legs).

              I didn’t use to eat the shell but after moving to Asia I ended up caring a lot less about whether I eat it or not. I also have other lazy/weird food opinions though-- like I’ll just eat the whole kiwi if im too lazy to go get a knife and spoon-- so maybe that plays into it as well

    • troglodytis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      So… Hey Lemmy… Does everybody wanna meet this dude?

      Dude’s everywhere. We need to meet this dude.

  • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not only does pineapple belong on pizza, ham & pineapple pizza is the only pizza that is consistent in all three states: fresh and hot, cold, and reheated.

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The reason why it’s good when reheated is the moisture in the pineapple. It keeps the dough from becoming a rock formation when reheating.

      For non-pineapple pizza, adding a bowl of water into the microwave has the same effect.

      That said, the argument is not whether pineapple is good on pizza or not, ofc it is, everything is good on pizza. But is it the best topping? No, that’s anchovies and capers (olives are good too).

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hmmm while I agree about Hawaiian pizza, I will say that cheese pizza shares the properties of consistency of all 3 states.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    My wife eats the tail. She’s Japanese, that’s normal. I don’t though, so please no tails mixed in…

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hah, my Japanese wife has convinced me to eat them too. I eat about 50% of them now.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Alright, I’m off to search what nutrients shrimp tails have now.

        Couldn’t find much. Most everything I found is that they are mostly chitin and they have fiber, omega 3’s, and no real break downs of nutritional facts. Lots of recommendations to just fry them, and one that said to save the tails/exoskeletons and put them in the freezer to turn into a stock. Lots of “just fry the whole thing”. I rarely eat shrimp, but maybe I’ll try the stock and then drain, season/cornstarch and fry the tails at some point to see if they can be made to taste like spicy shrimp chips?

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        More power to ya! What about natto? She tried to get me to like it but I can’t tolerate the smell. I found it’s a very easy lunch for my 2 year old who loves it, though.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Mix in a little mustard and some tare sauce. I didn’t like it at first but the taste just seems earthy to me now. I also don’t really eat it with rice. Either in those fish sausage tube things or alone on a spoon (which also cuts down on the stringy trails you have to deal with).

        • vortic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, no, I don’t like the smell, taste, or texture. I have made natto for her in an instant pot, though. She said it came out okay but I still didn’t eat it!

    • Im_old@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Look up “spaghetti allo scoglio”, basically spaghetti with various shelfish (and other sea food). They leave all the shells on by design. They also bring a separate empty plate on the side to dump them in, and a wet (lemon) wipe to clean yourself after. Cleaning the molluscs from the shells it’s basically part of enjoying the plate. And it’s good!

      • edgesmash@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m sure the dish is delicious. But when I go to a restaurant and I have to do work to eat to food, I always get annoyed. I’m paying for this meal so I don’t have to work, dammit.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I eat the tail too. Not because of cultural reasons, but because lazy AF and ain’t nobody got time to separate them.

      Its also why I dont eat fish that isn’t deboned.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ah, that logic sounds like you eat strawberries with the leaves still attached because you can’t be bothered to remove them, haha.

    • Fridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Absolutely. I got one for my house and having to use the shitty 1-ply paper in public bathrooms sucks so much. It feels terrible and doesn’t clean nearly as well.

      • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I just picked up a second Toto bidet this weekend from Costco. When I don’t have access to a bidet I feel like a savage

    • GTG3000@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      A simple spray hose next to the toilet is so great. Not only for use as a bidet but also for cleaning

        • GTG3000@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I think they’re called “hygienic showers” and it’s basically a small showerhead with a thumb button on the end to turn on/off. They’re getting pretty trendy with new construction flats.

          The only downside is that they tend to drip a bit after you return them to the cradle.

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hicks and Newt had to die in the beginning of Alien 3 in order for the film to thematically even be an Alien film.

    At their heart, the films are about Ripley being alone, more in common with the titular alien than with her termporary allies. She’s an outsider in her crew. She’s a civilian among marines. She’s a woman among convicts. She’s lost her child, she’s lost 57 years of her life. The Alien is her only real touchstone now, and in a way that is very expressly shown in the films, that becomes a kind of “relationship” in itself. She’s closer to the alien than she is to the people who surround her.

    If Hicks and Newt survived and were part of Alien 3, it takes that away and makes it an ensemble cast, which thematically doesn’t fit, and (I think) it’s one of the reasons that a lot of the new Alien films just don’t feel like Alien films; they’re missing that key thematic ingredient. Ripley is a tragic character, doomed to battle alone against the only thing she has left in her life.

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This is Korea. For whatever reason every single animal they consume that has unpleasant bits inside, they leave em in. Bony fish, bony chicken, grisly pork, soup full of shelled shellfish, and shrimp with tails. Hell, frequently entire shrimp head and all. Also locally where I live they have these different shrimp that have I dunno extra tough and sharp carapace. They don’t even try to shuck those things.

  • Interstellar_1
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Is there a reason not to eat the tail? I normally eat it.

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      I like a crisp fried tail it’s baller, but in like pasta it’s just hard to eat for no real flavor or textural payoff

    • Venat0r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s more that why would you want to eat it?

      Do you also eat the bones when you get other meats?

      Do you eat the skin of bananas or oranges?

      • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Vegetarian here so can’t answer for the meat and bones, but absolutely on the fruit and veggie front. Peels have a ton of nutrients, texture, and flavour

          • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I do haha. I know it sounds gross to a lot of people, but once you get over the mental block of “only the fruit inside is food” that most of us are raised with, they’re actually quite tasty. You can dry them out and make a tasty snack too if you don’t want to raw dog them

        • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          No one is arguing whether peels have nutrients. Do you eat banana peels and citrus rinds? That seems highly unlikely as they’re not palatable.

          • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes, I do. That’s what I was saying I’m my comment above. And just because you perceive them as highly unpalatable, does not mean thst everyone else does too.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      2 months ago

      No one supports the two party system. We recognize it exists and work within it to change it. But it’s designed to not change, so it’s hard.

      Stomping your feet and voting third party for president is performative at best, disingenuous at worst.

      Local elections, vote third party if you want.

      Is that bullying? I lost track of the line between facts and harassment.

      • Th3BFG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Voting for and propping up bad politicians is support. You were doing great until you said, “Stomping your feet…”. That’s devaluation of a position you don’t agree with and defamation of the opinion haver all in one. It’s generally considered bullying. Just consider if everyone who shared your view voted third party instead of voting for a Republican in Democrats clothing?

        • Statfish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 months ago

          Easy to be idealist when you never hold office. 3rd parties never have to show where they would comprise, because they are not running for these higher offices in a meaningful way.

          The republican agenda is so profoundly awful, and the US electorate has not yet resoundly rejected it. Meanwhile, we’re too busy “trying to send a message” to recognize that the democrats are the only party even marginally open to progressive policies. Depending on where you live, there are a lot of groups pushing for election reform, and many places where that will be on the ballot. Get involved, help make that change happen…but you can do that and also flush the big orange turd.

          How did I get dragged into this in a joke thread??

          • Th3BFG@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            If you’re never given a seat at the table, then how can they talk about their compromises? I agree with a good portion of what you said. I wasn’t trying to fight people, but it did ask for “Radical Ideas” lol.

            • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              How can your third party ever have a seat at the table when they put all their resources and funding into national elections they can’t win?

              • Th3BFG@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I agree that only focusing on national elections is not good. A quick search will show that there are independent and third party representatives though, so while some candidates fall short, cough Jill Stein cough I would hope not all are discounted.

            • Statfish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, it’d be great to see more 3rd party candidates in down ballot races. Should your first seat at the table nationally be the presidency?

              • Th3BFG@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                It wouldn’t be the first seat. A quick search shows that there are independent and third-party representatives. I agree though.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          It is literally to have a viable third party under First Past the Post. It boils down to Duverger’s law. Or more broadly Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem

          We need to focus on the actual voting system before we can start generating and supporting Third Parties.

          Specifically we need a cardinal voting system. It’s literally the only way to gain viable third parties that are not just extensions of the major two.

          Sadly it’s too late to get voting reform on any more ballots this year.

          But you can still get involved.

          https://www.equal.vote/

          • Th3BFG@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I know there is the Ranked Choice Voting concept which sounds appealing. I’ll read on this too. Thank you for the information!

            • chaogomu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Ranked Choice is an Ordinal voting system that fails Arrow’s Theorem.

              In some rare cases, it can produce a result even worse than First Past the Post. There are a bunch of flaws in RCV, because it was invented before mathematical evaluation was as robust as it is these days.

              Simulation, and some unfortunate real world examples, show that if you vote in and election with at least three somewhat viable candidates, and keep strategy in mind, you can rate your preferred candidate second and improve their chances of winning.

              No voting system should be able to do this. RCV has more flaws in addition to this already game breaking one.

              • Th3BFG@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                OK, Ill keep that in mind. I need to read more. Thank you for the education, I know it isn’t your responsibility.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, that’s not how our system works.

          In our system you never vote FOR anyone. You are always voting AGAINST the worst candidate. That is literally how it is set up. That is the definition of a two party system.

          Voting against a worst candidate is not propping up that system. Because one of those candidates is going to win either way due to the electoral college.

          If everyone, literally everyone, that was Democrat decided to vote Green, then they’d still lose. Again, electoral college. Nevermind the fact that getting everyone to do it is literally impossible.

          • Th3BFG@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            What you described is also not how our system works. The Electoral College does what it pleases. See the elections from 2016, 2000, etc. I do agree that the EC is a major issue in this.

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              That too. Faithless electors are a train wreck waiting to happen. some states have laws thankfully, but not all, and that’s a huge issue.

        • Magnergy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Everyone should just ignore their actual incentives. Wow. What a wonderful solution to collective action problems; why didn’t anyone ever think of that before? Come on. I don’t believe you are that stupid.

          They gave facts and you dismiss them with a label because of a little ridicule? Your ending suggestion doesn’t even do the job… we can grant you the impossible, sure all those people vote third party. Result, still a loss, and their least preferred major party wins. Whoops, all those voters we granted you picked different third parties. Because as little as they barely agreed on preferring one of the major parties, they agree on a ranking of the “third parties” even less. If you ask for us to grant the impossible, at least make it one that would work.

          This is currently a multi-tiered 170,000,000 people system we are discussing. History and mathematics are against simplistic appeals for quick changes. Propose childish thinking, and it is little wonder you get ridiculed as acting childish.

          • Th3BFG@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Your post is a prime example. i didn’t dismiss what they said. I pointed out where I disagreed with their concept of support, pointed out what bullying is, and then asked a consideration. I don’t need you to agree with me. I just was asking for consideration of a concept. Your generalized dismissal is enough.

            • Magnergy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I presented a position on the topic. You ignored it in favor of discussing my comment’s tone.

              As for the concept, I considered it decades ago. The math was the same then as now, and time has only added those decades of supporting evidence.

              Ridicule of the ridiculous is warranted. And characterizing ignoring the reality of political systems as stomping one’s foot is the mildest of ridicule. It isn’t bullying. If you weren’t dismissing the facts in surewhynotlem’s comment, then I’m glad you accept them.

              • Th3BFG@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Your position was not ignored. You spent your first paragraph insulting me, that isn’t tone. I’m reading on the math you mentioned to better educate myself regardless of your “tone”.

    • TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Jesus, it’s always “bullying” when people get told the consequences of their choice. You don’t need to believe in politics, it will still fuck you over. A lot of people don’t have the luxury of not participating because they aren’t spoiled white suburbanites able to just hide from the consequences of ignoring how their country functions.

      • Th3BFG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think you missed the point of my comment. Detailing consequences is not the issue, losing the plot is. I’ll work on my delivery for the future. I agree with your overall statement though.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do people blindly support it? I live with it and vote accordingly but I also advocate for alternative voting methods. People voting third party do not fully understand that our first past the post system makes it so their candidate has no chance.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The problem is that all voting systems have undesirable corner cases and anomalies. The voting system isn’t really the main problem, it’s the political culture, corruption and the inconsistent application of rule of law.

        • SeaJ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          There is a difference between undesirable corner cases and the garbage that is first past the post. Changing it to even ranked choice increases engagement and how politicians politic. So changing the voting system does indeed help a whole host of problems. There are obviously some other things that need to change like having publicly funded elections, increasing the House of Representatives and having multi member districts, making the Electoral College obsolete, etc.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      As far as I can tell the incrementalist argument goes like this:

      1. The two-party system is destroying the country.
      2. But one of the two parties will destroy democracy imminently, so we have to vote for the lesser evil this time, and then,
      • Statfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago
        1. The two-party system is destroying the country.
        2. Resoundly reject the party that is actively pushing for a weird christofascist state. <-- the us electorate has not yet done this!
        3. Actively push for election reform <-- AK, AZ, CO, DC, ID, MT, NV, OR, and SD will all have ballet initiatives this November regarding election reform. VOTE!
        4. Get involved with organizations that are moving to further the causes you care about, and get active in politics.

        Voting for president is the smallest part of civic participation, not the end-all-be-all

    • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      We need work to end the two party system, NOT work that demonizes people for making rational choices under current circumstances.

    • Lad@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is the future of US politics.

      2024 - vote Democrat or the Republicans will end democracy.

      2028 - vote Democrat or the Republicans will end democracy.

      2032 - vote Democrat or the Republicans will end democracy.

      2036 - vote Democrat or the Republicans will end democracy.

      2040 - vote Democrat or the Republicans will end democracy.

      And so on.

      At some point, people will have to start voting third party because the two major parties will never give up the status quo.

        • atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          And primaries are the “real” elections to get us there. General elections will continue to be major party A vs. major party B, with a “this is the most important election ever” backdrop, while primaries are where we have to try to get our important issues (like election reform) carried by generally electable candidates to get those issues injected into the parties.

          And the amount of money spent on primaries confirms how influential they are capable of being.

      • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Given that the previous one actually did try to steal an election it actually has merit. I wasn’t worried about republicans before Trump. I just thought they were dicks.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    When someone does not like garlic bread, Allah Willing, they shall know no happiness, and shall not live long.

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    None of the doom and gloom really matters, every human in history has lived in a time of crisis. How we handle the challenges at hand determine the challenges for those that follow, but panicking about it is a waste of energy.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s really hard to accept this these days. Before new media, people often had no idea what was going on outside their town or villiage. Must have been bliss (Except for the entrenched poverty, filth, disease and oppression of course lmao). Now it’s hard to avoid learning about who got killed in what gruesome way today.