• ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            Believe me, the dolphin was very interested in sex.

            Peter, being an adolescent dolphin, frequently had sexual urges which disrupted his lessons, and taking Peter to a downstairs pool with two female dolphins proved to be a logistical issue for Lovatt. Eventually, Lovatt relieved Peter’s urges herself, stating “It wasn’t sexual on my part. Sensuous perhaps. It seemed to me that it made the bond closer. Not because of the sexual activity, but because of the lack of having to keep breaking. And that’s really all it was. I was there to get to know Peter. That was part of Peter … It would just become part of what was going on, like an itch, just get rid of that scratch and we would be done and move on.”

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Howe_Lovatt#Complications

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    1 month ago

    This guy has no backbone and just shills culture war trash while sucking his handlers dick at every corner…

    This dude has no character

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      So many modern Boomer conservatives still cling to the mythology of the JFK era and the national labor movements that made America great in the wake of WW2. Reagan and Bush and Trump knew how to pander to these folks and to scapegoat minorities and immigrants as the cause of the country’s decline.

      Vance doesn’t have any of that. He’s entirely a product of the 21st century without any roots to speak of. He hates his mom for needing oxy to get through the day. He hates his home town for failing to pull itself up by its own bootstraps, like the armies of government contractors at Yale and Langley and Silicon Valley. And he hates poor white people for not embodying the mystical traits of superhuman races in his favorite pulp fantasy novels. All of that is naked on his face when he tries to talk to anyone over 30.

      He’s not like us. He spends too much time on the computer and now he’s a fucking weirdo.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 month ago

        the national labor movements that made America great in the wake of WW2

        Ah yes, the wake of WWII. When America was on top and producing everything, because all of our competitors had the ever-loving shit bombed out of them. Also they needed to buy stuff too.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          The industry Americans retained could have been under the same monopoly conditions of the 19th century. American working class labor could have been little more than serfs under these same historic conditions.

          Instead, we got modern consumerism - private homes, cars, clothes, vacations, fancy liquors, home appliances, toys…

          That isn’t what the working class of Latin America or Sub-Sahara Africa got, despite also being removed from the war.

          Argentina was the 9th largest economy during the height of WW2. But Peronism looted the country rather than investing in it. South African apartheid and Brazil’s military coup set their economies back decades. These countries weren’t bombed by Germany or Japan, but they never took off like postwar USA.

          Strong domestic unions held back the capitalist rot in the States at least until the Volcker shocks under Nixon, Ford, and Carter.

    • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      They all do. I don’t see any different outcome if it was DeathSantis or Vivek or Token Tim Scott instead of JD.

      These all people have one thing common among them - they all lack backbones and have absolutely no convictions beyond enriching themselves. Not one of them have even an appearance of a coherent policy that works for / is in best interest of anyone but themselves

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 month ago

    On July 31, Trump dismissed suggestions that JD Vance was a bad choice, telling the National Association of Black Journalists that vice presidential picks have “virtually no impact” on elections.

    Then why are Republicans bothering to attack Tim Walz?

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Even putting that aside, rather than defending his pick he just says sure he sucks, but it doesn’t matter… Way to go?

  • djsoren19@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 month ago

    To play devil’s advocate in defense of the Vance pick, I don’t think Trump needs any assistance in courting boomers. He’s managed to appeal to the generation’s racist tendencies and “I got mine” attitudes to great success. Vance is to try and attract the young dudebro vote with a discount Andrew Tate. So far he seems like the incel messiah, so maybe it’s even working, but obv in all normal circles being such a giant incel is weird af.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 month ago

        I know the term is involuntary celibate, but the “movement” has kinda moved onto any men who believe that a woman is obligated to fuck them. That crowd has picked up on a heavy pro-natal message, and Vance’s disparaging comments about women who don’t have kids plays well there. He might have had sex, but he’s trying to offer those losers a world where they’re on top of the power structure.

              • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                he’s an incel who got laid. philosophically, psychologically, socially, he still is. he just got his dick wet a few times. as much as they whine about it;the difference isn’t big enough to waste valuable bandwidth defining.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  There is a big difference in a virgin and someone who fathered children.

                  And no I’m not defending him. He’s a total piece of shit. Just not involuntarily celibate even if he shares some views with those who are.

                  I mean just as one example of how they’re different: level of sexual frustration.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think it’s more than simply being involuntarily celibate. It’s a whole thought process and belief system that places blame outside of yourself which creates a great animosity towards others.

          I wouldn’t call myself an incel, but I sure wouldn’t be passing up sex if I were able to have it. I just don’t blame or hate women for my problems. It’s entirely my fault that I suck lol

  • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 month ago

    Millennial here, we don’t like him either. I’m really concerned for the couches my children will have to grow up with.

        • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 month ago

          Can confirm. My grandma had a sealed couch that would protect it from stains and the like. Scum like Vance would slide right off.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That doesn’t make sense - how else do you get little couches if the momma couch can’t be fucked?

          But yes, you are correct about that, but I try to PSA that its not the great financial & economical depression that caused such behaviour - that behaviour is the default, the normal, what humans always did.

          Its only the extreme profit driven consumerism that followed that that indoctrinated us into the ‘buy new completely discard the old, dont think about it, it was always like this, since the dawn of time’ … a price generations are now beginning to pay.

      • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        They just foresaw Vance’s arrival, and were trying to protect the virtue of their innocent couches from him.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It was foretold in the lint patterns of old, embroidered into the sofas of kinds, printed on those little inside stickers that tell you how to wash things, that one day a great couch fucker will be born, a couch fucker with pretty blue eyes & mad eye-shadow game, a couch fucker to unite both the couch fucker nation, and ottoman fucker nomads, one couch fucker to rule them all (couches, not other couch fuckers).

          But the prophecies were lost to time and legend, decayed like the crusty old jizz between the cushions, subject to decades of hateful propaganda by the evil those-shitty-massage-chairs-that-dont-shiatsu-but-only-vibrate oligarchy.

          However in the end, the great couch fucker (GCF?) shall rise, and don’t do shit.
          Not for incompetence reasons, nor all the hate speech, but because love defeats all. For nothing ever compared to that first couch, the couch he took when his parents tried to throw it out, the couch that is now in his bedroom where the bed should be.

          In the end, as all great legend go, the great couch fucker was defeated by a sweet old couch that fucked, fucked good.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I never quite understood what those were for…I remember people mocking boomers that still did that (because it was something the generation before mostly did?) but was it to preserve the couches?

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It was to preserve the couches. And TBF they did work for that, but they raised the question of why the fuck did you pay for expensive furniture that you never used, and why did you devote a whole room in your house to that shit? The answer is it was for “company”, i.e. visitors you didn’t like and couldn’t wait for them to leave.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Probably because at least some boomers were educated enough (in their schools as well as hearing it straight from their parents) about the dangers of fascism.

  • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t let’s ignore the searing hatred us gen xers have for this living example of retrograde evolution.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Real question is why younger generations aren’t more negative? Just ignorance or do they actually like him more?

    • don@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      The survey comprised 1,001 adults, out of a total population of about 330 million in the US. I’d think it very likely that many demographic groups weren’t accurately represented in that 1,001.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      My guess is that it is ignorance and some of the same ignorant people look at the age of someone and think a younger person will somehow represent younger people better in some undefined way.

      I’ve heard the low-wattage types (we probably all have) that looked at Biden and donnie and wrote them off as more or less the same because they are both “old white guys”. So they either didn’t vote, or voted third party…I bet these same types see Vance and think he is somehow a good choice for younger voters…