• Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      No, but I’ll try to answer anyway:

      • SystemD is large, it is a dependency for many things, it sort of takes over managing the entire OS, and a lot of Unix Philosophy Purists hate that about it because it goes against the idea of “one program does one thing, keep it simple”
      • SystemD is inflexible and things must adapt to its way of doing things, not the other way around, and again, people don’t like that because Linux Users all have “don’t tell me what to do” as their core philosophy (even I’m like that, I just have different priorities on what I don’t want to be told about)
      • Some people argue it slows things down. I don’t know. I never cared enough to find out. I will keep it that way because I personally have no interest.
      • The head developer, one Lennart Poettering, is a bit of a jerk.

      That fourth one, I feel, is the real sticking point. Much like Pulseaudio (same dev), whatever merits OR defects it has as a computer program are entirely 100% irrelevant, people are just mad because the head dev posted asshole things online and that means he’s evil and everything he touches is retroactively shit.