• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Hell, I think it’s a crime and I’m a lily-white American!

    The flat bottom is pretty damn sus, too.

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      it’s an American style wok, suitable for stove top burners that are gas, resistive electric, or inductive electric.

      Traditional woks would sit upon a ring over a gas or otherwise fire burner, which typical american homes do not have.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I’m pretty sure I remember an episode of Good Eats where Alton Brown went outside and cooked over a charcoal chimney starter in order to get enough BTUs for a proper stir-fry, because American residential stoves aren’t typically capable of it. (And even if they were, teflon would be both pointless and harmful because it would (a) interfere with the fond creation/deglazing that you’re trying to achieve on purpose, and (b) off-gas toxic chemicals due to the high heat.)

        In other words, a teflon-coated flat-bottomed wok is just dumb, even for Americans. It literally has no reason to exist compared to a frying pan because you can’t actually do wok cooking techniques with it.

        Edit: I couldn’t find a video of the Good Eats episode, but this article corroborates my memory, at least.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      flat bottom woks are plenty good in my experience, yeah it’s not the exact same thing because duhhhh, but it’s a whole lot better than a regular frying pan for stir fry.