• chingadera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Uh uh uh uh, states rights bro, it was about a lot of things really but yeah it was mainly about the states rights

      • hungryphrog
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Ummmmm… To have rights. Do you have something against rights? So much for the tolerant left!

      • chingadera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I love that they try to keep running around in circles as if we don’t know for sure that they’re just identifying with other racists.

        They’re cowards.

        But to answer your question, well it was about a lot of things, it was mainly a states rights issue, and they didn’t want their way of life to change. That way of life may or may not have been exploitation and torture of an entire race of people, but I’m not gonna say slavery although we both know for a 100% fact that was the main reason, because I’m a dumb turd and I like backing racists openly but I’m too much of a coward to just say it out loud because I am aware it’s morally bankrupt.

        iTs nOt hATe ItS HeRitAgE