• lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    383
    ·
    1 month ago

    As an American, I’m rooting for Canada.

    But this all feels very by design of Putin to fracture US alliances.

    • Dreamless4561@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      212
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m so upset at my Canadian family members who supported Trump.

      I got an uncle who was constantly saying he supports trump cause he’ll “run the country the country like a business” - i don’t think either trump or him actually understand business all that well.

      I hope Canadian-European relations get stronger, and hopefully Canadian-American relations will be rebuilt once this fucker is gone

      • billwashere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        141
        ·
        1 month ago

        Does your uncle realize trump was able to bankrupt a casino? Where they can can almost literally print money. And not just one, but three of them. This man is literally one of the most inept businessmen I have ever seen.

          • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            But he looked smaaaat on the apprentice. That’s all the fucking morons who support him seem to remember about Trump.

          • ricketyrackets@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            This is the most accurate statement. There’s a reason why Trump wants Greenland, Canada, and Panama. Russia also wants all these. Wants free reign to move their boats and military through these areas and to be able to use the Panama Canal again.

            The more I see all the stuff going on here, the more I am coming to realize that the orange taintstainy is just a Putin muppet puppet.

            Everything this man does seems to appease Russia.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        89
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s the fallacy that I thought was learned back with Ross Perot. You don’t run a country like a business. It’s a government.

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m pretty sure that people who say they want to “run the country like a business” just think it sounds good but haven’t put 2 braincells worth of thought into it. Businesses exist to make money. Government exists to serve citizens.

          Do you want firefighters showing up to your burning house and asking for a credit card before they put out the fire? Or maybe have the post office decide that it’s not profitable enough to service entire states? The whole idea is moronic.

          • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean, America already charge their citizens for healthcare, so they’re not that far off from your hypothetical

          • SkyeStarfall
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 month ago

            And it’s dumb, because, in the end, where is all that profit supposed to go?

            The answer obviously is, to improve the country and the quality of life of its citizens, so we’re back to square one anyway

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            Also the USPS is too busy delivering papers full of ads and junk mail, rather than investigating mail theft.

        • aname@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          How was it learned and when. Where I can lear more? Wikipedia didn’t have any clear answers

      • gramie@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do you tell him that Trump has filed for bankruptcy six times with his companies? What does that say about his business acumen? How often has your uncle filed for bankruptcy?

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That doesn’t work. The hardcore Trump supporters think bankruptcy is a genius life hack to get out from having to repay debts.

          They actually believe it’s smart to borrow money, hide them in other businesses and personal accounts, then declare bankruptcy to keep the money. To the rest of the world, that’s called “embezzlement.”

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 month ago

            Don’t forget the inflate the value of your assets so you can borrow even more money, but declare them as a lesser value on your taxes.

      • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        1 month ago

        The “run government like a business” crowd gets to me. I’d like to see business run like a government. Owned and controlled by the workers.

        • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s one of the dumbest perspectives I’ve heard that continues to irk me. Why the fuck would you want something that’s supposed to do X to do Y instead?

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m up in the middle of nowhere Ontario in the north surrounded mostly by trees and lakes and not even remotely close to anything American … but yet I still have a few friends and family who love your dumb orange beanbag president.

        I don’t understand the pull that this idiot has on people or the millionaires and billionaires that pour their money into him for some god forsaken reason.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        My mum last night on text.

        “We’ll see what shithead Trump retaliates with tomorrow. The only way to stop the maniac is with a bullet!”

        “Have you noticed how shithead has not left the White House since he was sworn in?”

        “Trudeau is doing a great job!” (Referring to the presser)

        I’m glad I don’t have your family OP

        Edit - for the kids out there my mum is 74. She’s a baby boomer. Some of them are good people. They are not well off. I told my parents with the tariffs coming if they find themselves struggling to let me know because I will help in any way I can.

      • spooky2092
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 month ago

        he supports trump cause he’ll “run the country the country like a business”

        THIS MOTHERFUCKER BANKRUPTED A CASINO.

        People say they want him to run the country like a business, but that man bankrupted a money printing machine, probably because he was doing all kinds of illegal shit and didn’t actually run his business like a business. Why would he run a money printing country any different than his money printing business.

        My dumbass uncle feels the same way as yours, and I have to bite my tongue so after to remind him that he and trump have something in common: they both embezzled from their company until it died.

      • group_hug@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 month ago

        He will run the country like he does all of his businesses; into the ground.

        He even failed at running a casino. Except this time he will likely be burying thousands of Americans along with the country.

      • sibachian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        i’m still waiting for an explanation on how running anything like a business is objectively a good thing.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      both Canadian and American retirement portfolios will suffer. i don’t know why anyone would root for such a thing at all

    • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yes, it’s Putin who’s totally controlling trump and making him do tarrifs. After all, Putin leads hamas, putin did 9/11, putin killed millions in Iraq, Putin killed millions the middle east, Putin’s funding UAE and Israeli genocides against Sudan and Palestine How peaceful the world would be without Putin /s

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          No he is dead on. The US has been shooting itself in the foot for decades in order to murder little brown kids.

          The only way your argument makes any sense is if Russia ordered Biden to commit genocide and throw the election. The DNC decided to run a geriatric against Trump. They are no smarter or better than the Republicans.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            More wHataBoUTiSm from another .ml account.

            Again, just shocked. Tu quoque fallacy at its finest.

            • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              So you believe the Democrats corruption and incompetence is natural and AIPAC has nothing to do with it. But the Republicans corruption is POOTIN!

              Meanwhile the first person Trump invites is Netanyahu.

              If someone said the same things about Israel controlling the US as you are saying about Russia, ignoring that the links to Russia are far far smaller, you would call them an anti Semite.

          • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            I didn’t want to believe it, but .world and Reddit powermod user overlap must be real high. They all are like a hivemind of “making fun of tankie” aka the liberal version of “woke”

            • dx1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              The mods are sure acting like reddit mods. They’re already the self-appointed arbiters of truth.

              • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                That too somewhat, but I ment more .world users, it’s the only place and the only type of users who actively fight on the wrong side and bring up Reddit arguments and the worst of reddit behaviour into Lemmy

                • dx1@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Seeing the same. Not that many different users either, just really vocal.

          • btaf45@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The DNC decided to run a geriatric against Trump.

            They didn’t decide shit. Only politicians decide whether they wish to run or not. The DNC literally does not have the power to chose who runs and who doesn’t. You know the DNC is not a person right? The DNC is literally made up of the primary delegates elected by the voters, who then choose a new executive committee every 4 years. Did you put yourself forward as a potential delegate? Stop blaming the DNC for the choices made by the voters.

        • Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          How is this whataboutism? They only pointed out that the US has a long history of doing shitty things without being controlled by some foreign actor. It’s perfectly plausible that Trump is doing shitty things because he thinks he will personally gain something out of it, without anyone pulling his strings. He just doesn’t care if the rest of the country goes up in flames.

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It’s not whataboutism. He’s pointing out the empire has been going far longer than anything having to do with Trump. I’m apparently not allowed to discuss anything else about that here though, because the mods know the absolute truth about all things and will decide what ideas are allowed to be spoken.

        • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Then the focus will be another, “world peace” to America to the west is when their elites can do whatever they could ever dream of at the cost of the entire earth, it’s people and animals exploited.

          Putin now, then Palestinans, then Panama, then Canadians, the gays, dei, muslims, socialist, leftist, woke, so on and so forth until everyone is dead but America gets all the toys they could ever play with. Your nation and your propaganda is a joke. Putin is awful, but he’s undeniably done less damage in this entire years as leader of Russia than America in 2 terms

    • LemmyThinkAboutIt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I just hope Canada, Europe and Mexico unite and start working closely together. Fuck the USA under Musk (trump). Together we are strong. Much stronger than individually.

      Feels bad to say but the USA haven’t been a reliable partner since the first time they elected Trump. Who knows what they’ll stand for in 4 years? A normal person or a complete lunatic that has already disassembled the legal structures few days after getting into office? Hard to know. Very unreliable and extremely concerning.

      I cant believe americans are letting this happen while sitting by idly.

      I can’t think of a single alliance in history that went from unbreakable to garbage within three weeks because of the whims of one person that should honestly be „dealt with“ before it’s too late.

      Writing this as a German with rather conservative views.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Trump administration says it put the tariffs in place to force China, Mexico and Canada to stop the spread and manufacturing of fentanyl, in addition to pressuring Canada and Mexico to limit any illegal immigration into the United States.

    Can anyone else see any actual logic to this? Do the Trump Republicans really believe this, or are they just saying it? What do they really want to achieve, apart from Trump being able to see himself as a tough guy?

    • breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      127
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s no logic to it at all. It’s absolutely not about that.

      Almost no fentanyl is getting into the US from Canada. A vanishingly small amount of illegal immigration occurs through the Canadian border.

      It’s just fascism and imperialism.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 month ago

        The majority of fentanyl being smuggled into America is being smuggled in by American citizens. It’s not like cocaine or cannabis. You can smuggle a huge amount of fentanyl in a tiny bottle. Why risk sending it with an undocumented person?

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        One would think there would be some talk about precursors… But nope just tax it 25 % that will be sure to get producers to stop. Pure idiocy

    • takeheart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      98
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Saw a policy expert say it’s a mixture of 3 things really:

      1. Trump likes to blame outsiders for problems and this is well received by his loyal base and gives off strongman vibes
      2. long term plan to switch from income tax (scales the more you earn) to consumption taxes (the poorer you are the more you pay for for consumption, relatively speaking) which benefits the rich at the expense of the poor. this wealth transfer is easier to sell when the populace is focused on outsiders
      3. Trump doesn’t understand basic economics

      source: https://youtu.be/2I1L1fXaYDs

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Tarrifs get paid to the Treasury, the Treasury is getting controlled by Musk and Trump, they can take whatever they want from those funds. Whos going to stop them? The Supreme Court takes bribes which can come from the same pot.

        He just needs to keep a bit of support until all angles are secured. So he just spreads lies and blames everything on people here illegally to keep people pitted against each other. The largest source of illegals in this country is from overstaying Visas, the thing they are expanding to higher numbers… Aka more people to keep blaming shit on while putting on a show of deporting the ones that are already here.

        Honestly doesn’t look like they’ll need much time to accomplish it.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 month ago

        Or they are just thinking of a quick cash grab … gut the system and get as much wealth out of everything and everyone as fast and as much as possible … let it all crash then abandon everything with all their money and let someone else fix everything.

        • takeheart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think in that scenario it’s more likely that they would “buy the dip” then that they would up and leave. Some of the billionaires also want to found their own techno-fashist fiefdoms. This could be a good catalyst for that.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 month ago

        They absolutely want to implement a national sales tax. They’ve been talking about it for a very long time and now they have the power to do it. And it’s very much a “fuck the poor” policy.

      • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Lol on the switch from income tax. I haven’t heard a peep about that since before the election. Everything is just going to cost more now and I’m still going to be paying income taxes.

        • takeheart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          p 698 of project 2025 document:

          The federal income tax system heavily taxes capital and corporate income and discourages work, savings, and investment. The public finance literature is clear that a consumption tax would minimize government’s distortion of private economic decisions and thus be the least economically harmful way to raise federal tax revenues.

          more riches to capital and corporations, consumers will pay for it. it’s all in there

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 month ago

      A. Enact sales tax on poor people so that they can fund further corporate tax cuts
      B. Ruin relationships with the closest American allies as that is a net benefit for geopolitical rivals like Russia, who Trump is demonstrably in bed with
      C. Market value collapse let’s all the rich cronies that have crawled up Trump’s asshole buy out what’s left of America’s assets at fire sale prices. 10 richest men doubled their wealth during covid. They want that to happen again.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’mma let you in on a secret: Fentanyl basically is only a meaningful threat to addicts who don’t know what they were taking. And if we actually cared about them, we would pump a fraction of a percent of our military budget into rehab and therapy to help them kick the habit and put narcan (sp?) in every emergency first aid kit right next to the defib. Beyond that, it is just an excuse for why a cop beat his wife or murdered a black kid.

      As for what they ACTUALLY want to achieve? Saw an analyst hypothesize (on bluesky) that the real goal was the 10% tariffs. Put those on and drop them after vague claims of getting something in return (comparable to South America… fucking earlier this week?). It makes trump look “hard on China” while destabilizing relations between North America and later NATO. And it would result in basically every company jacking up their prices to pass that on to the consumer and then never lowering them because capitalism.

      End result? increased profits for the oligarchs who jacked up their “made in America” products even more than the 10% they were now paying on materials and components.’

      As for this? I don’t like seeing my retirement funds go down the toilet (and am not optimistic they are ever coming back up this time) but fuckin’ a. Burn it to the ground. It will hurt the little guy but it will hurt the 0.0000001%ers even more. The world is going to be on fire and have no water by the time I am eligible to take cash out of my 401k without penalties anyway.


      That said? I assume he wants his base to believe the reason why groceries are still expensive is because Canada and Mexico just love fentanyl so much and they hate America. And his base will eat it up while the same useful idiots make sure the left is united against the Democrats (who do fucking suck but…).

    • Shadow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      It feels like he’s trying to accomplish the kind of hostile take over you see in business. That doesn’t really work with a country though…

    • ShadowRam@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      These tariffs are a way for Trump to tax his population so he can fund whatever he pleases. And the majority of his population don’t even understand this 25pct tax is going from their pocket straight into his.

    • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      Trump is still butt hurt about world leaders, especially Justin Trudeau, laughing at him and making fun of him behind his back. The tarrifs are a way to generate funds to pay for tax breaks for the rich. It will also allow American companies to raise prices, and profits, without the cheaper Canadian products and with less supply so more demand. It’s a bit of him being a bully, a bit of revenge, but mostly, like everything else he is doing, it’s about allowing the wealthy to loot the country bankrupt while burning the thing to the ground and enriching himself.

    • Bone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s just a special operation to route out Nazis. It’s 15 cases going down to 0. It’ll be gone by Easter.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    1 month ago

    Trump is so horrible he got Americans to side with the country putting retaliatory tariffs on them.

    Also it should be pointed out that Trump essentially declared war on an ally because he wanted to seize Canadian land.

    Any talk about drug trafficking is silly since the first thing Trump did was pardon one of the biggest drug traffickers in the world, Ross Ulbricht

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    1 month ago

    Here are some numbers to consider.

    The US sold $441 billion worth of goods and services to Canada in 2024.

    Canada sold $482 billion worth of goods and services to the US in 2024.

    The US has a populating of 334.9 million people.

    Canada has a population of 40.1 million people.

    Per capita, every American man, woman, and child spent $1,316.81 on Canadian goods and services.

    Candians spent $12,019. 95 on American good and services.

    Who isn’t pulling their weight in this trading relationship?

    This isn’t about illegal immigration and it isn’t about the 20 lbs of fentanyl that tried to cross the border from Canada.

    This is about the billionaire class raising taxes on the poor and raising prices for Americans.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      On the topic of fentanyl, if I may be so bold as to ask, do that many Americans genuinely give a shit about any fentanyl coming across any of our borders? I suppose those who do drugs that are likely to be cut with fentanyl, but as an American whose drug use consists of at most alcohol and legal weed, fentanyl isn’t something I’m particularly worried about. I’m not saying it’s not destructive or dangerous, but it’s not something I ever feel worried about. Maybe I’m just too poor to be exposed to people who do the kind of drugs that get laced with fentanyl, or maybe I’m lacking more empathy than I realize, but while I’ve seen sad examples of people whose lives have been destroyed by opiates and fentanyl in news programs and documentaries, I also have a hard time not seeing the fear of Fentanyl as anything more than wealthy parents like Trump, who know their kids are doing cocaine or other drugs, worried that their kids (like Don Jr) will accidentally OD on some laced drugs, which again, maybe it’s an empathy problem on my part, but maybe if you aren’t smart enough to test your drugs maybe you shouldn’t be doing them. I don’t know, it just seems like dhe dumbest issue to tank the whole economy over (unless that was the goal all along, and you just want a boogeyman-scapegoat for an excuse). It’s not that I even really care about “the economy” that much either, but I do care about ordinary people being able to afford housing and food.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Never believe Trump’s stated reasons for doing something, because Trump is notorious for being a pathological liar. Fentanyl doesn’t have the slightest thing at all to do with Traitorapist Trump’s new tariffs. The amount of fentanyl coming from Canada is almost zero. In his first term, Trump told a documented 20-25 lies per day 7 days per week. The fentanyl thing is just part of his quota of 25 lies for that day. The best way to understand Trump is that he literally thinks dishonesty is a virtue and honesty is a vice.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Who isn’t pulling their weight in this trading relationship?

      Not how that works. Even with a “trade deficit”, a trade relationship must have an element of bilaterality. You’re exchanging something for something. The exception would be when one side militarily has their boot on the other side, i.e., sweatshop/imperialist relations. Which the U.S./Canada relationship is not exactly a poster child of.

      • galanthus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Idk why you are being downvoted, that seems about right.

        A purchase of goods only equates to exploitation in the head of Trump, the contents of which, despite his protectionist and nationalistic tendencies, seem to resemble swiss cheese more and more with each passing year. So I wouldn’t adopt his rhetoric.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 month ago

    American here.

    Don’t counter with tarrifs. Counter with embargoes. Trump loaded you a gun and handed it to you. Pull the fucking trigger already.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      1 month ago

      Counter by decriminalizing everything to do with violations of US intellectual property. Ignore all US patents. Let Canadian drug companies make pharmaceuticals without having to pay for a US license. Let repair shops disable the DRM systems that prevent HP printers from accepting any old generic ink. Let Canadian broadcasters show US movies and TV shows without kicking back money to Hollywood. Let Canadian farmers repair their tractors without first kicking back money to John Deere. Allow anybody who wants to to jailbreak iPhones, and sell kits that allow other people to do that. Free Canadians from having to kick 30% of every purchase back to Apple in California.

      • EchoCranium@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 month ago

        That was Cory Doctorow’s recent take on it too. Trump just threw out the trade agreement with Canada and Mexico he was so proud to say was his accomplishment, after renegotiating NAFTA. They really should say fine, stew in your own mess. Ignore patents, crank out cheap pharmaceuticals, forget about DRM. Nationalize US factories on their soil. Will hurt for a while until new trade is established, but there is the whole rest of the planet to trade with.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          Nationalize US factories on their soil

          This is extreme and could warrant an invasion from the US. Wars have been fought for less. Look at what happened to Guatemala when they wanted to take back some of the half off their farmland owned by Chiquita.

          Canada is a mid-sized power but not really in a position to flaunt US power like that

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 month ago

            Canada is part of Nato. Isn’t trump going to leave Nato? So that would mean all of Nato would be on Canada’s side. That is one hell of a leg to stand on.

            • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Nato doesn’t have the navy to help Canada in a fight. Assuming America isn’t torn apart by a civil war as factions of the military defects and there’s a revolution in the streets. (60/40 at that point. Fighting a century old ally is a red line that would absolutley cause a civil war)

              the US navy would chuckle as the french and british and other relevant navies lie at the bottom of the atlantic. And at that point, Russia moves in and Europe is in a land war while the US decides to partner with Russia.

              • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Britain and France also have thermonuclear weapons. Britain has Vanguard-class ballistic missile submarines and France has Triomphant class ballistic missile submarines, and both have nuclear capable fighters and bombers. If Europe is to fall - let the whole world fall with it.

              • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I dunno, Invasion requires a ground war. If the US attacked thier ships, they can just essentially blockade the US at ports of entry. The US can’t invade all points of entry and ensure safe passage. One shoulder mounted missle can take care of that. The US just can’t win that exchange. It takes 100x the force to secure than to disrupt. And in general the Uzs doesn’t have the troops to protect all it’s assets overseas. Nato would cripple us in a week.

                • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  this conversation was specifically about the US turning aggressive against Canada. the US turning on its allies and getting its global presence destroyed is one thing (I dont think that would happen, either). But to be clear, in this scenario we are talking about, If the US went aggressive against Canada, there is absolutely nothing NATO can do to help Canada except fingerwag, or nuke America.

                  And if Nuclear weapons were threatened, you could bet your ass the Mouth Foaming Z-Nazi party in Russia would rush to the aid of America, and declare that they were ready to invade and launch on the “Insane Europeans” to help the “Americans we have no problem with”

                  Russia wants to be hegemon of Eurasia, or at the very least Europe. If America wants to sacrifice it’s world influence and power to set up some kafkaesque one state entity across north America, Russia is more than happy to let them have it as long as they get their peice of the pie.

          • EchoCranium@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            I know, it’s a nuclear option. Seriously shouldn’t put that card down right off. And yeah, hasn’t gone well for any central or south american government that the US has destabilized or overthrown due to some large corporation’s interests. But as all this garbage escalates, bringing up the possibility could make owners and shareholders squirm a bit. It hurts them financially, the only thing that would make them care. People who Trump might (might, small chance) listen to. But before that point? Those companies can produce all kinds of things. Doesn’t mean Canada or Mexico have to let those goods go out across their borders. Their trade agreement has been torn up by Trump again. And you know that bureaucracy is complicated, things get held up in customs sometimes, occasionally for very very long times. Paperwork gets lost… When companies here in the US are screaming about their supply lines breaking down again, now because of HIS stupid tariff war, there will be some negative political fallout. Trump’s ego and image are vulnerable things despite all the bluster. He won’t back down, but he could pivot to something else and let this nonsense drop.

          • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Canada should make nuclear weapons. Such is life in the shitter multiverse. I’d want my commune to have nukes to. Humans are psychotic hairless monkeys and are untrustworthy.

          • Redex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            This is an insane hypothetical but the worst thing is I can totally see Trump declaring a “military intervention into the Canadian comunist takeover of US interests and property” or something like that

        • sibachian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          the rest of the world is too chicken shit. there is no rest of the world to trade with as the us cries to everyone that they need to embargo nation X.

      • katy ✨
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 month ago

        Counter by giving Luigi Mangione diplomatic immunity.

      • Dumpdog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I wish this comment (merc’s comment) would get bumped to the top of every post related to the tariffs. Tit for tat tariffs is stupid with predictable results. Strategic tariffs and other targeted mean of retaliation are better. Why is there only a 10% tariff on oil? Because the US needs Canada’s oil. You fuck with our economy we fuck with the resources we give you at a discounted rate. Look at CUSMA (hehe. or NAFTA or whatever broken trade agreement that was) and target the industries that the (US) wanted to protect.

        And for people using the tired fight analogies - just because someone tries to punch you in the face doesn’t mean you punch them back in the face. You have already been training to kick them in the fucking balls.

        Tit for tat tariffs is just political posturing for weak leadership.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          Also, this is a fight against a much bigger opponent. Not only is the US population 10x bigger and their economy more than 10x bigger, that size means they have a lot more trade partners, whereas Canada is pretty isolated and trades mostly with the US.

          If you’re up against a much stronger opponent in a life-or-death fight, you don’t fight fair.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m pretty sure that the margins are slim enough in the house and senate that if Trump suggested military action against Canada, that his wings would be clipped.

    • HertzDentalBar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 month ago

      We’re doing both. Both BC and Ontario are cutting off American Booze. That’s gonna hurt American company’s hard.

      My hope if Trump keeps it up we cut off the power, and better yet the gas. Although that might make him try to invade or something.

      Up next will be him calling Canadians Nazis and trying to annex Quebec.

    • Tiefling IRL
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 month ago

      The “women are too emotional to be leaders” crowd are running the show with the mentality of a grade school bully

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 month ago

    They should have made it 26%. Trump wouldn’t be able to resist upping it to 27%, and they could just spend a day reaching the logical, yet stupid, conclusion to this mess.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 month ago

    As an American, I don’t see a choice. This is a trade war, shots were fired. I hope it’s a short war.

    • itsame@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      These trade wars are seldom short, they are easy to start but hard to stop. Look up Chicken Tax (started in 1960s)

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 month ago

        All we need to look up is the fact that Biden kept a lot of Trump’s tariffs. That’s not a slander on Biden, just fact. Most people don’t understand that you can’t just shock entire industries overnight with knee jerk trade policies.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 month ago

    LeT’s StArT a TrAdE wAr WiTh OuR AlLiEs -my fucking countrymen, apparently

    I hate this fucking timeline

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Kamala would have been at best delaying the inevitable. The DNC is not capable of meaningfully changing fast enough to react to the growing threat of fascism.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well you know, we have Trump to think for that ceasefire that Israel has already violated

        You know that Trump is going to allow Hamas to stay in Gaza right? That is fitting since Bush help Hamas take control in the first place. From the Hamas viewpoint, the whole thing was a success. By kidnapping random Israelis, they got hundreds of Palestinians freed. Which means we are going to see this whole thing repeated in the future.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If we had a more representative electoral system, people could be free to vote outside the two party system. Then people could vote how they want and their vote could still be counted against the republicans if their preference didn’t win.

      You do support democracy right? Because democracy is not “vote for my preference or else”. That is a hostage situation and should be treated as the crisis it is. Your fellow Americans are not represented by their options in the voting booth. This is a crisis!

      Yet the democratic party hasn’t done away with the FPTP voting system in most of the blue states they control. They wanted safe states and easy elections with no hard questions to answer. Even if it meant republicans winning it all and then some.

      The United States of America is more important then the Democratic Party.

      Videos on Electoral Reform

      First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

      Videos on alternative electoral systems we can try out.

      STAR voting

      Alternative vote

      Ranked Choice voting

      Range Voting

      Single Transferable Vote

      Mixed Member Proportional representation

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sigh. It’s not like most of us don’t already know all this. That’s a great plan, why don’t you work to make it happen? Get a third party that is not a joke and not a set of useful idiots for someone like Putin. Build from the ground up, too, not run once every four years. Start winning local elections and building a party that isn’t captured by corporations, and actually is out there fighting for labor and for the middle class and can tell owner-donors to get bent when they try to send in the lobbyists. Try to get ranked order voting passed, etc.

        Many of us would LOVE that. However, I don’t see anyone seriously doing that. I’d love to see a million Bernies bloom, running as whatever party they unite under. That’d probably bring tears to my eyes.

        All I tend to see is useless lectures on how it should be, and how voting for Democrats is “just as bad” as voting for monsters on the right, so we should all just stay home and pout and pontificate about a perfect system while the world burns under donvict. I also see a hell of a lot of single issue voters further splintering the Democratic Party on fringe identity politics stuff and demanding that others should follow them on the way out the door if the Democratic Party doesn’t capitulate on some rather fringe stuff.

        We only had TWO viable choices last fall. That’s it. All the wishcasting in the world was not going to change that.

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        This shit has never been less relevant. Republicans will never go for this and Democrats can’t find their own asses let alone win an election. This isn’t happening.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      If it were an actual shooting war, Canada would have to surrender within days. Virtually the entire population lives within a two hour drive of the border, and the US military is orders of magnitude bigger than the Canadian military.

      But, while the US could easily conquer Canada militarily, the guerilla war would be another matter.

      The US/Canadian border is the longest land border in the world. The US could do nothing to stop Canadians from entering the US. And, once Canadians were inside the US, there’s no way to tell a Canadian from an American. South Park lied, not all Canadians have floppy heads. Once inside the US, guns are freely available to everybody. Plus, the market is so open, it’s easy to get what you need to make bombs.

      So, imagine the “Troubles” in Northern Ireland, but spread out throughout the entire US. The American psyche is not prepared for that. Americans have been in all kinds of wars, but the last time Americans had a war on home soil was the US Civil War. Just look at the overreaction to a mere 3000 people dying on September 11th. Decades later and the ripples are still being felt.

      And, that’s not even considering that probably more than half the US wouldn’t support an attack on Canada, and a significant fraction would help Canadians with sabotage and other guerilla activities.

      As chaotic and norms-breaking as Trump is, I have to think someone would stop him before he actually went into a shooting war with Canada.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah. And it’s one thing when you have a highly motivated army fighting for a cause they believe in, supported by a civilian population that’s 100% behind the war. In that case your army will put up with hardships to get the job done. It’s very different when the military doesn’t believe in the mission and the people at home are against the war. The US learned that lesson in Vietnam.

          And then there’s how the attacked country responds. If you live in a war-torn region, or under the thumb of a dictator, maybe you welcome, or at least grudgingly accept the army coming in. But, it’s very different when it’s a stable, prosperous country with a good government. Just look at Ukraine. It had its issues before Russia attacked, but it was relatively stable, becoming more prosperous, and democracy seemed to more or less be working. As a result, they’re highly motivated to make huge sacrifices to fight off the Russians. My guess is that more than 90% of Canadians would not welcome Americans. Even die-hard anti-Trudeau conservatives who were previously MAGA types would switch sides if the US invaded.

          It would be absurd for the US to attack militarily. But, these last 2 weeks have been full of absurd things, so who knows.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    So from the conservative viewpoint, what is the rationale for the tariffs? Are people really supposed to believe it has something to do with fentanyl? Like do conservatives actually believe that or is there some other narrative besides Donald Trump is looking to flex his power?

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      For the most part it’s not getting the kind of attention you might expect, they are seeing this as all “part of the plan” and celebrating their great trade-warrior leader punishing the “bad guys” and the white house has deliberately withheld a LOT of the information about what’s going on. Most of the breaking stories we’ve gotten have been from foreign press. We didn’t even hear the tariff schedule until fucking France media issued stories.

      There is not going to be the satisfaction we all hope for, not until there’s literally a new dust-bowl as we get ravaged by a new great depression, which as bad as it could be, might be our only hope for a more balanced political system going forward. I hate that these clowns have made me into an accelerationist but here are.

    • pacology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Back in 1890, there was no income tax. The federal government was funded through tariffs. With the upcoming rewrite of the tax code, the current administration needs new revenue, and trariffs are one of the few the president cab levy unilaterally.

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Tariffs are essentially a shitty sales tax. I’ve read it described as a way to switch the US federal funding from I come tax to a hidden sales tax.

        The revenues will also be much much lower, which is why they need to eliminate every federal bureau.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      or is there some other narrative

      I believe a couple different things

      a) he’s intentionally weakening the US economy to both weaken establishment institutions and spread mass discontent. he wants people nice and angry and fearful for the future. so when he takes more extreme actions later on, it doesn’t seem as bad. also he’s probably preparing for some sort of riot movement that includes political violence in the next couple years. as the establishment gets weaker, he’ll be in a better position to essentially ignore them. so for example Supreme Court says something unconstitutional? Maybe he just ignores it and enforces his will regardless

      b) in the near future we may see a serious decoupling of the US economy from the world. maybe it’s due a planned war or some other circumstance and this is in preparation for that. tariffs tend to cut off the economy from the outside world. it’ll hurt less later on if we do some of it now

    • rabber@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah I’m confused because this is going to ruin American billionaires. Doesn’t maga worship billionaires?

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you have the money to ride it out you can buy the country for pennies on the dollar.

        • Dumpdog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I had to chuckle about this comment. I said that same thing in a rant to family and friends last night including using the words “for pennies on the dollar”

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 month ago

    If this escalates, wait until Canada decides to stop buying US made weapon systems. It will be expensive and time consuming to retrain, but the US is not a reliable defense partner under the neo-Nazi GOP. The US MIC must see the writing on the wall.

  • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    Does this break/invalidate the existing free trade agreements between the countries? Does this mean that NAFTA and TRUMPFTA are now void?

    • festus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think it’s void exactly - there’s some stuff around visas that’s still active. But yeah, as far as being a trade agreement it’s pretty worthless.

    • hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, he’s using his imaginary fentanyl-from-Canada crisis to do an end run around that.

      It’s the same shit he does to his contractors: agree to a deal, then once the work is done find some fake “flaw” that justifies him demanding compensation. There’s a reason why nobody in New York was willing to take contracts for his buildings.