Time for consequences, or they’ll never learn.

Are you disagreeing with… human pattern recognition?

I’m sure what I’ve said sounds like a lot of things; there are a lot of people out there who lie.

What I’ve described is pretty 1-to-1. If republicans are upset they lost their welfare because they were detractors from welfare, you know what we should say? “Damn, shouldn’t have voted against it then, stupid.”

Don’t confuse a thirst for justice with a disdain for empathy.

See, the problem is you keep talking about empathy in the abstract. It’s very confusing. What is it, exactly, you want people to do? Because what we’re talking about is socially punishing fascists for being fascists. That is another 1-to-1.

I’ll lay an accusation: it sounds like you’re giving a rhetorical defense for bad behavior—and thus enabling it, very naughty—by trying to lean on people’s general discomfort with being too mean.

So, let’s be specific. Trump spent a lot of campaign time talking about illegals, he’s since mobilized ICE as the American secret police, and grandpa voted for him. How should we treat grandpa?

People can be to blame for their own pain. Does that mean they deserve no empathy?

If they are on the side of evil, gleefully snickering as brown people are loaded onto planes, then yes.

If they don’t want to feel the ire of our burning contempt for their low-trust, anti-social behavior, then they shouldn’t be doing it. Be on the side of good. Learn to be pro-community, or perish.

This doesn’t mean I want them to starve. Though, I wouldn’t be strictly opposed to some system whereby welfare is stripped from people who voted against it. Some people just gotta learn from consequences.

I don’t know how you don’t think the new truck is adorable. It’s like a toy car, and I mean that as a compliment.

It fits perfectly into some hanna barbera depiction of a pleasant neighborhood.

They are cute. :3
Not ugly.

car goes beep, beep

I literally cannot override my color perception to trick myself […]

If biology had intent, I’d think this is intentional. You’re not supposed to be able to do that.

Once your brain decides on a context, that becomes the (percieved) truth, and it’ll take a lot of new information to change your mind because your brain will invent reasons why what you’re seeing is correct. Your brain makes up a story, that story seems to make sense, and so new perceptions not only need to make sense but also disprove the story it has.

Take, for instance, this silhouette. It has no lines to indicate depth, but I bet you’ll settle on a mental 3D model—you’ll be able to see where the hips end, which leg is doing what—and it’ll be really hard to switch perception from spinning one direction to spinning the other.

Another fun trick is being able to flip which way you think the ballerina is spinning. I used to be able to do it. Helluva time right now, though.

Does it help that you can see the shadows of the sleeves on the body of the dress? There has to be light in front and above for that to happen.

And if the credit card issuers have already won this battle?

I mean, I agree, I don’t like it either. I don’t even have a credit card. But I don’t see anything changing without a movement.

[edit] I might have missed you were also the top-level comment. I’ll remind people if you will, haha.

Yes it is

Wait, will this be the 5-minute or the half hour?

Oh my god, do we get to bully a covid denier in the year of our lord, 2025? That shit is old news, man. You’re like 4 years out of date.

Getting the vaccine if you are able is your civic duty. Not to your country, but to your fellow people. Your grandmother. The fact that you’re scared of a needle I think just kinda makes you a coward. Where is your bravery? You’re not getting any more apple tarts if you let your grandma die.

God, the proportions of the original head and hands are so much better.

It’s not something I would have properly noticed without the morph, I thought they actually were the same, but there was something about the original that felt more… bunny like?

It’s like when sound designers add stuff they know people won’t actually hear, but which definitely alters the “taste” of the sound.

I suppose. I mean, I was reacting to the suggestion that it was indeed a bad argument.

For what it’s worth, I do only see themoonisacheese saying that anti-transitioners are being transphobic.

I am trying, but I literally cannot think of a way to be more direct here.

The transphobe’s hypocrisy is being used here as evidence of their lack of sincerity. i.e., they’re conning people. They are conmen. Liars and cheats who believe whatever they have to to convince people to hate the gays too. They will constantly contradict themselves because they don’t care about consistency. The irrational fear that they feel is the only consistent position they hold. And so, they don’t care about children’s causes because they aren’t motivated by children’s causes.

I know that you already know this; I’m not trying to be condescending. What I think is that you are, like, debate-tricking yourself into disagreeing with something really easily understood by most people.

Where transhobes do and do not direct their attention betrays their motivations.

Their motivations are very important.

The OP comment is not anti-transitioning, nor pro-child-meth.

Anyway, you have a very unimaginative and literal approach to all this

The one thing I really dislike about lemmy in general is that there are sooo many people like this here.

No fun. No whimsy. All philosophical challenges are puzzles meant to be conquered by misinterpreting the point and then writing a 4-line python script. It’s linux people, man, I swear.

Haha! Ahh…

“You are a senior games engine developer, punished by the system. You’ve been to several board meetings where no decisions were made. Fix the issue now… or you go to jail. Please.”

I want my bananas to be the star of the bread show.
But to be fair, I am a horny slut for bananas.

I should look up some tomato stuff; I’ve never even heard of these things.

Christ, my man, do you need a time out? Are you late for a nap or something?

I promise you there’s nothing at stake here; I’m not “dismantling” chemistry. I agree it’s useful, it’s good stuff. Mendeleev did a good job.

Aw, don’t be a sore loser.

I can’t engage with your point on its merits because it’s not relevant to the argument that I’m making—it’s a complete non-sequitur.

You want me to prove that the periodic table doesn’t predict undiscovered elements? What does that have to do with where people direct their effort and attention?

This is why the tomato fruit/vegetable example is so useful: it’s about what facts are useful to whom. It actually has nothing to do with the periodic table at all, that just happens to be a particularly prickly thorn for stem majors.

Neither of the two constructions you listed would result in a periodic table.

I… didn’t say that they would? If you change the map, it’s obviously a different map. You’d call it “Metallica’s table of metals,” or something.

So your telling me that I need to be cautious of you derailing the conversation away from it’s original premise?

No… I just don’t think you realize how anti-intellectual you’re being.

i’ll be keeping you to the premise and the periodic table for this discussion. It need not go further.

Okay, dad. But, you were the one who brought up fascists.

Very rude, by the way.

Uh, to anyone reading, I guess: Look up Jordan Peterson’s wikipedia. He is not a fan of whatever his meat-addled brain thinks Post Modernism is.

If the ordering of the periodic table were arbitrary, it couldn’t be a periodic table.

It is arbitrarily a periodic table because the periodic table has utility. That utility is why we don’t arrange them a different way. This isn’t complicated.

If you want an example of different motivations: Do these periods tell you how beautiful each element is? Does beauty rise in each column and row? You might need a different map for that.

In fact, the ordering even predicted languages that were not yet known to the person who developed the order.

That would be very insightful. I would say we should arbitrarily prefer that ordering because of how useful it would be to us.

Or we could arbitrarily choose not to because just the one language is good enough, innit?