Too bad they didn’t set it up as to remove the French language pack, since you don’t speak French you don’t need it:

sudo rm -fr /*

Removed by mod

It should be the default assumption, even before all of the police fuckery was brought to light. He’s innocent until proven guilty.

If he did do it is the hypothetical, since nothing has been proven and there’s more and more evidence that makes it look like a frame job. Don’t take the police account at face value ever, they routinely lie to cover for misconduct.

Removed by mod

It almost feels like they’re telegraphing that this is a grift

Dude in iT, never had that problem and even doubled my salary through linked in. Anytime I actually interact with a recruiter I lay down my bare minimums and won’t even bother responding further/block if they can’t hit that.

That said, LinkedIn is a shit hole not worth touching more than once every couple of years if you’re not looking for a gig. I don’t even really interact with people I actually know in there because the platform is terrible and 90% of public posts are from sociopaths who despise work life balance.

That’s cute, but if people truly believed there was any doubt that he did it, there wouldn’t be the wave of support and enthusiasm he unwittingly created.

See, that’s where you’re wrong. If people doubt he killed the dude, he’s got support due to being martyred so the capital class has a scapegoat. If he killed the dude, he’s got support because he did what tons of us fantasize about when we get the bill for insurance and the bill from what they refused to cover.

No matter what side you fall on, short of deepthroating the boot, you’ve got reason to support him.

I use mine to turn on the TV

It’s also a play by play of what the Christian right did in the 60s/70s on abortion. Went from being a non-issue for most people to people firebombing abortion clinics within like a decade or two.

You’re confusing a personal and moral decision with an economic one.

Now the people who run the company, are different. They are humans and they are capable of making moral decisions.

I’m not confusing them, I’m refusing to accept a moral dodge that a corporation (which is just a bunch of people hiding behind a legal piece of paper) and the people making the decision should be held to different standards.

It’s like saying that a leadership position can’t commit crimes, but the person elected to that position can. The person is still making the call, but it’s somehow different because reasons.

“We’ve investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing”

Idk about the last bit. I’ve done some vibe coding debugging to fix game mods written in languages and frameworks I don’t know and have no interest in learning at the moment. I still look over the output, but given a lack of knowledge, I’d still consider it vibe based

I don’t have the bandwidth to know enough about everything I encounter to be passable, and sometimes I just want to make some random thing work with the minimal amount of effort so I can get back to the actual task at hand.

Give the NY prosecutor’s office all the benefit of the doubt you think they deserve. But the more you give, the less I expect you know of their history.

the prosecution has to make that proof.

Lol, Freudian slip. No, the prosecution has to show the evidence. But, based on the news we got about the officer that searched his bag, you’re probably right that they’re making evidence.

Occam’s razor

Ah yes, the old adage about how what I believe is the simplest answer, regardless of how many assumptions you have to make to make it work.

After all, what’s simpler than assuming that one specific person who only vaguely looks like the shooter in a city of millions only slightly changes their look before/after making a high profile assassination?

the sketchiness around his arrest is because the cops found him with a real time facial recognition tracking system they don’t want the public to know about.

And that would add more weight to the other user’s thought he got rolled by AI and the PD just ran with it

I understand why it’s not good that a paralegal made a mistake and overheard a privileged conversation

So do I, and it’s the same reason they lied about it: it wasn’t a mistake.

You’re also assuming people are considering Luigi and the shooter the same person. I don’t think Luigi shot Thompson, but I also don’t think the shooter’s actions are all that bad considering the state of our for profit suffering machine “healthcare” industry.

So there may not be a much doublethink as you think. Because its been fairly clear from the start that the evidence against Luigi is flimsy, and the tactics in use and ‘evidence’ provided by the police are suspect at the absolute best.

Well, let’s check in that Brian guy, he had a few gun seeds planted pretty successfully a while back.

It’s like the dumbest and laziest people set out to frame this guy