• idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    254
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s completely wild that people drink cow hormone juice and then think that soy is affecting their hormones.

  • LowleeKun@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    140
    ·
    4 months ago

    It is a badge i would wear with honor, because soy is awesome and the myth is bullshit.

    • snekmuffin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      afaik, it’s not really a myth. it does actually have plenty of phytoestrogens and it’s often recommended as a supplement for HRT. Probably not enough to have much of an effect on its own though

      • cccc0@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        83
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        it does actually have plenty of phytoestrogens

        you think because it has “estrogens” in the name it turns you into a girl. phyto- means plant. are you a plant?

        recommended as a supplement for HRT.

        by who? facebook?

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          4 months ago

          by who? facebook?

          You know what I’ve been seeing on Facebook lately (qualifier, I use it for my local village group and those last few friends that refuse to use anything else)? People posting the fact that the AstraZeneca vaccine used a modified chimpanzee adenovirus and implying this is the cause of the mpox business.

          I would 100% bet they got it from Facebook!

          • Femsoup [She/Her]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think I remember a 4chan post with the supplemental thing, might originate from there instead idk

            • r00ty@kbin.life
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              I expect the soyboy stuff originated on 4chan. But I would believe the “evidence” for other people commenting about it is also on Facebook.

              I mean on Facebook it kinda makes sense that the crazy rises to the top. The normal people limit their posts to friends only. You can spot the crazies. They have all posts set to world visible.

              • Taleya@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Nah, Facebook doesn’t originate shit, it’s too creatively bankrupt. It’s just the amp for other forums

        • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          Exactly. It has a similar name in one of the ingredients. But: this ingredient is not estrogen and it basically has zero impact on the hormones in your body. And all experts know that. That’s why there’s no scientific papers supporting this whole soy / estrogen theory.

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        4 months ago

        https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19524224/

        Its basically been proven as bullshit, physiologically if you are healthy its not true. There MAY be edge cases where if you are lacking the vitamins/minerals/essential fats necessary for hormone regulation it MAY in SOME people cause SOME irregularity but edge cases are just that.

      • cheddar@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 months ago

        Phytoestrogens and estrogens have some similarities in their chemical structure and ability to bind to estrogen receptors, but they have important differences in their effects on the human body:

        • Estrogens are hormones produced naturally in the body, primarily in the ovaries in women. They are essential for sexual and reproductive development and function[5].

        • Phytoestrogens are plant-derived compounds that have a similar chemical structure to estrogens and can bind to estrogen receptors, but they are not hormones and are not produced naturally in the human body[1][4].

        • Phytoestrogens typically have much weaker estrogenic effects compared to human estrogens like estradiol[1][3]. The effects of phytoestrogens depend on factors like the specific type, dose, and individual differences in metabolism and estrogen levels[2].

        • Consuming phytoestrogens from foods like soy, flaxseeds, fruits and vegetables is unlikely to have a significant impact on estrogen levels or health, as the amounts are very low compared to what the body naturally produces[4]. Concentrated phytoestrogen supplements may have more noticeable effects.

        • In some cases, phytoestrogens may actually have anti-estrogenic effects by blocking estrogen receptors or reducing the body’s own estrogen production[1][3]. This is thought to be due to their structural similarity to estrogens.

        Some potential benefits of phytoestrogens that have been studied include:

        • Reducing menopausal symptoms like hot flashes in some women[1][3]
        • Improving cardiovascular health markers[2][4]
        • Reducing risk of certain cancers like breast and prostate cancer[3][6]

        However, the evidence is mixed, with many studies finding no significant effects[1][2]. Potential risks include:

        • Blocking estrogen receptors and reducing the body’s own estrogen production[1][3]
        • Interfering with thyroid function in some cases[2]
        • Potential effects on breast and prostate cancer risk, though the evidence is inconclusive[3][6]

        Citations: [1] https://herkare.com/blog/estrogen-replacement-therapy-vs-phytoestrogens/ [2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468963/ [3] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/648139 [4] https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/320630 [5] https://advancedhormonesolutions.com/do-you-know-the-difference-between-phytoestrogens-and-estrogen/ [6] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3074428/ [7] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0149763421005558 [8] https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/phytoestrogen

      • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s really strange that all of the replies to your comment are essentially agreeing with you but you got downvoted into the dirt for stating facts.

  • Zozano@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The really funny thing about this is OP is egregiously wrong.

    Soy doesn’t contain estrogen, it contains phytoestrogen, which not only doesn’t produce any estrogen-like side-effect, but actively prevents our bodies from taking and producing estrogenic hormones.

    This is all very ironic, considering drinking excessive cows milk leeches calcium out of our bones and exposes us to a smorgasbord of hormones not designed for humans.

    Soy is shit tier anyway, oat milk all the way.

    • Clent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      4 months ago

      This leeching effect is not true. It’s a myth spread by alt-health providers.

      • ngwoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        4 months ago

        At this point I just don’t believe anything weird anyone has to say about food humanity has eaten for thousands of years unless they can back it up with real studies from real medical journals.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          4 months ago

          Right?!

          Its all just marketing. We die for whatever reason anyways just let me eat in peace!

        • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          I just do this with everything that is advertised as something big. The hidden danger of food. Source? What the president of a country said about its own country. Source? Anything not trivial gets treated as misinformation unless proven.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I haven’t totally believed this, but I also think its potentially useful to spread anyway. Sure, misinformation is bad, but so is climate change. Which one is worse?

        • Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          Misinformation is always worse in the long run.

          If people find out you knowingly lied about one thing, they’ll assume you lied about other things that are more important, regardless of evidence.

          Climate change being an excellent example of this where it wasn’t so much lies as bad guesses and so many people dismissed it despite the growing evidence.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            People still eat their carrots thinking it improves their vision.

            I mostly agree with you, but but I haven’t seen evidence either way saying it doesn’t have this effect.

            • Zozano@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Just because something hasn’t been proven one way or the other doesn’t mean you should just believe either of them on a whim.

              It’s totally okay to hold beliefs tenuously and then not feel attached to them when they’re proven wrong.

              It happened to me here in this thread. I stated cows milk leeched calcium, but it doesn’t, I was misinformed. There’s no shame in admitting I was wrong, but it reminds me to be more cautious about assertions of fact in the future.

              I don’t want to be wrong any longer than I need to be.

          • Zozano@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            You’re right. After looking it up it seems like I’ve had some bad intel.

            I’ve corrected my previous post.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      Out of all the things you can make out of soy, why milk? Tofu exists and it’s grand-master based food. I’ll smash several plates of mapo tofu without hesitation. Soy sauce, edamame, all ridiculously good shit.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        I disagreed with you until last night about tofu. But gods damn that orange tofu I had last night was just excellent. Good tofu is apparently something that exists and was just always out of reach

      • Strawberry
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        tempeh is also insanely good, and remarkably nutritious

      • medgremlin@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Personally, I prefer soy milk to cow or oat milk because it has a better nutritional profile. It has less sugar and fat, and more protein, as well as having fiber. (Some oat milk brands do have fiber in them, but most of the ones I’ve found are very high in fat, sugar, and calories.)

        Edit: And I like the not-overpowering vanilla flavored ones because I pretty much only use it for cereal or to accompany cookies.

    • jetsetdorito@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      If soy did do this, red states would be trying to regulate it so trans people couldn’t buy it.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Amazing, prior to today I didn’t know people could have this much information on soy and still end up objectively incorrect about its position relative to oat milk.

      • Zozano@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Go fuck yourself buddy. You and your non-oat-centrered world view need to check your privilege.

  • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    4 months ago

    See, what his coworkers did was good bullying. Anon learned something and also wasn’t fired for whatever skeevy pseudosexual thing he was implying about his coworker, probably over politics. Winning hearts and minds, people.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      4 months ago

      Fragile bros terrified of phytoestrogen in soy will be chugging dairy milk without a single concern.

      • fogstormberry
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        my family believes it completely. and hiding my actual estrogen is probably reinforcing their belief

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        And anon’s boss actually did exactly the thing you’re supposed to do when this happens irl.

        Make them explain it for the group, and then socially ridicule them.

        Just bully that fucking nerd. Maybe a swirlie, depends on the workplace culture.

  • daepicgamerbro69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    4 months ago

    How the fuck does this get posted all the time without anyone ever picking up on the fact that this workplace dynamic is obviously made up and anon is literally a 4chan kid who just changed the actors in his story from '‘teacher’ and “classmate” to ‘boss’ and ‘coworker’ so he wouldn’t get banned on an 18+ imageboard.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Not only that, but mammal milk is literally hormone soup. Including estrogen. And soy doesn’t actually contain the same type of estrogen. They contain isoflavones including plant estrogen (phytoestrogen). Similar but different chemical, with different bioavailability in mammals.

      Also:

      For example, many studies have found that Western-type dietary patterns characterized by high intakes of red meat, processed foods, sweets, dairy, and refined grains are consistently associated with higher estrogen levels ( 3 , 15 , 16 , 17 ).

      https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/foods-to-lower-estrogen

      Basically the diet of the carnivores that mock the soyboys. How’s that for projection?

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    4 months ago

    On that day, anon found out he really is a soyboy soyjack. Did he learn anything else? Nobody cares, only that soyboy won’t manage to pull that on anyone at work.

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    4 months ago

    What kind of fuckin idiot thinks that soybeans have synthetic female hormones of a caliber that would feminize you or whatever.

    • holgersson@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      The same kind of idiot that conveniently ignores all the hormones in meat and dairy used to maximize profit

    • faercol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      I know right. If it did, you can be sure trans women would know about it.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s also why the most deeply delusional MAGAs have to convince themselves that Tim Walz is gay - because a gun toting bird-hunting liberal does not compute for them.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Finding a reason to completely disregard not just the ideas but even the humanity of huge swaths of other people is conservatism 101. Just give in to your most base tribal tendencies, and “know” that all those good-sounding ideas are in fact wrong and evil because they’re coming from the wrong/lesser people.

      When you can’t argue against ideas, argue against the people saying them. See if ad-hominem attacks will work on people. (narrator: they did)

  • quixotic120@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 months ago

    I moved to a rural area a few years back and there’s a lot of farms here. Thus, many of the people I’ve met are farmers or have worked on farms. After a year or so of asking people what they raise/grow on their farms it finally happened and I met someone who said they grew soybeans. I asked him if he was a soyboy and he was really not amused.

    I’m pretty sure he saw it coming too, when he said soybeans I had to have a huge shit eating grin on my face. I was waiting for that day

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          By definition, cows are female.

          Your joke sucks, unless it’s a “onejoke”, in which case it sucks even more.

          Nut milk comes from bulls, now that’s a better joke.

          • Mature female cattle are called cows

          • Mature intact male cattle are bulls

          • Young female cattle are called heifers

          • Young male cattle are oxen or bullocks

          • Castrated male cattle are known as steers.

          • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I was going to suggest digging up, but you’re on track to reach orbit if you maintain tunnelling on this bearing and momentum.