Did he do it for the memes?

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    253
    ·
    5 months ago

    Even if he goes full and permanent vegetable, he’s still not Trump. Top priority is stopping Orange Hitler from taking control again, so please for the love of human rights, vote for whoever has the the best shot at beating him - if that’s Biden, cool. If it’s Harris, cool. If it’s a literal ham sandwich, fucking fine - all three are orders of magnitude more qualified to do the job then Trump.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, I’ll vote blue… But get this fucker off the ticket. I’d much rather it be Kamala, or like… Nearly anyone really.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, the question isn’t who Democrats will vote for. It’s who independents will vote for. And there are a lot of independents.

        Relying on the “Never Trump” vote to win this election feels like a terrible risk.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          And if we’re simply relying on “never Trump” then it shouldn’t matter if Biden steps down because the goal is still the same.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          We don’t have democracy anymore.

          First, the SCOTUS ruling did away with that last week, but let’s ignore that for now…

          We have a fascist authoritarian in charge who refuses to even consider stepping down until he dies - certainly he is not going to let the people decide who gets to be the Democratic nominee - vs. someone who will become a dictator for life and do the same, but somehow much, MUCH worse.

          I hope that many people vote Blue No Matter Who… yet I fear that many independents won’t.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              It’s a bit hyperbolic in this context, yet also technically accurate in a surprising number of ways, though mostly I was focusing on how he won’t allow an election to determine who gets to be the Democratic nominee. Also, he has the legal ability to murder his opponents, and is both supporting (in Gaza) even while also decrying (in Ukraine) genocide. Anyway, the point is that he is suppressing opposition (from within his own party, by not allowing a debate about who may replace him), which yes he has the legal ability to do, fwiw. So he is not much of one perhaps, but has some characteristics not entirely dissimilar to one.

              • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                yeah those observations are fair. Regardless now I’m afraid Trump has sealed his win with this shooting. His voters are going to be mobilised like never before for the election

                • OpenStars@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Hrm, so he wasn’t seriously injured, and the outcome ends in his favor, hrm… I see.

                  And Biden’s administration ends up looking weaker than ever before, for allowing it to happen. I hate politics.:-(

        • FatCrab@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          The question is who will turn out to vote. The number of “independents” who don’t overwhelmingly vote republican or democratic is vanishingly small. This is found time and time again. Ultimately it’s a question of which electorate turns out and which is demotivated enough not to.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Anyone supposedly independent or undecided at this point is and idgit voter who will either stay home or vote for Trump.

      • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Maybe. Though I say we just come together, get his ass in, and then in the first year also get his ass out and let the VP or Speaker step in. Like it or not, changing now IS risky and it is arguable whether it’s the better choice. I’ll go with what the majority chooses because fighting against Trump and the GOP is what’s important.

        Let me repeat: We are in the game where we must do what the Republicans do and come together against a common enemy. So I recommend everyone agree on a candidate then shut up and checkmark that box. We can go back to verbally juxtaposing our positions through digital larping, or whatever it is we do when most of us forget politics exist for four years.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think this is a dangerous attitude. He’s made some gaffs recently but overall has not been a terrible person or leader. Supporting the possibility of dropping a candidate this late in the game especially when there are no super star saviors waiting in the wings is the kind of party weakness the GOP would eat up and is a recipe for failure. You don’t have to love him at this point, but it’s too late to start over, just suck it up make a donation to his campaign and vow to become more involved in political change at earlier levels so hopefully we are not in this mess again.

      • VintageTech@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m voting Joe because he is still the only qualified candidate for the job. The package he brings is a Vice President who could do the job if he were to step down due to health/age concerns to guarantee a female President as his dream come true. She then gets to pick her Vice President which should absolutely be AOC. The opposition has no convincing argument to draw this out in a court as they would need to present their arguments to AOC for rebuttal,

        It’s just so batshit crazy it can’t fail.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m voting Joe because he is still the only qualified candidate for the job.

          There’s a couple of hundred million other qualified candidates in the US. If you’re looking for politicial experience, there’s several hundred in Washington alone.

          Dems have totally failed to bring through the next two or three generations of candidates. That the party feels that he’s their only choice is shameful.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Since when has the opposition needed convincing arguments to drag things out? They’ll come up with whatever bullshit they want just to keep stuff from moving forward until they get the ball again.

      • Asifall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        He has been a terrible candidate though. If the polling is accurate and trump has a slight lead in popular vote, Biden has less than a 5% chance of winning the election (according to Nate Silver’s models). Unfortunately, this is probably optimistic as polling has overestimated the democratic vote in the last 2 presidential elections including the one that included these same two candidates.

        • HappyStarDiaz@real.lemmy.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Nate Silver is terrible and usually terribly wrong, but just step outside the last year and it’s been crystal clear Biden would and will 100% lose the Electoral College to Dump. No amount of Cult Jr telling us to just vote blue no matter who is going to change that. Most Americans don’t know the difference between a row and a column or a watch and a warning, they aren’t thinking critically about Presidential elections.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s so ironic to see the “vote blue no matter who” people argue against replacing Biden when data shows a high probability of him losing. If they suggest we vote blue no matter who then why are they so ardently telling us that it has to be this one guy?

            • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              “the data” would also suggest that a late replacement could be destructive and have an even Higher probability of losing. More importantly the process to oust Biden is highly unlikely to succeed. Therefore the very act of pushing for these kinds of changes only demonstrates weakness for the GOP and accomplishes nothing but push away any remaining undecided voters toward a party that at least has a clear favorite. I wish people would support the current candidate more aggressively rather than destructively attempt for replacement when doing so is futile.

              • OpenStars@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                While you are at it, you might also wish for people to vote Blue. It’s not going to happen though - independents refuse to tow a particular party line, preferring instead for candidates to earn their votes, and they will watch the world burn, or even turn to Trump to help it, rather than give in. This is what true democracy looks like - sometimes people lose, when enough people on the other side vote to win. We can only control ourselves - e.g. if the Dems were to pick a replacement, there may be a better chance, while otherwise we simply sit back and roll the dice to see whatever happens.

            • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Who will replace him? Michelle Obama doesn’t want to run, Gavin Newsom has full support for Biden, and Kamala Harris is already VP.

              • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’m sure plenty of people would step up if he actually stepped down. What you’re seeing now is people doing damage control to keep from undermining his campaign. It doesn’t mean that they’re actually telling us their true beliefs. Newsom says he fully supports Biden, and if he stepped down, Newsom would fully support whomever took his place.

                I think Harris is just as bad of a candidate as Biden or Clinton. Michelle Obama is an option but I don’t see why we have to treat this like a TV reboot where we keep rehashing the same names and faces that we saw previously. I’d personally love Bernie or AOC, but I know the party leadership hates leftist candidates and will actively work against them, so we’re probably screwed either way just like we were in 2016.

    • Avialle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      5 months ago

      Going into survival mode forever, where either party can do whatever the frick they want, because they others mustn’t win! Nice system you got there, where it’s like 50\50 every time!

      They present you a Trump and therefore they can even kill your kids, as long as Trump doesn’t win. It’s a scam… both parties are in it. But they divided you all so perfectly fine, you stopped thinking a long time ago.

      Looking forward to your comments, telling me about NO BOth SIdeS!

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not sure why the downvotes. The American duopoly is a scam, you are very right. If there is any hope for change it needs to start lower down the food chain. Support the forward party, get involved in local politics, rally against gerrymandering as a hard as possible.

      • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Its truly an absolute shit system and it keeps itself propped up this way. What will it even take to see blue and red completely removed? Theyre both terrible options for the future of our world, but when November comes around, they’re still on the ballot.

        Until a revamped Constitution is written by people of all genders, colors, faith, wealth, and education, this will never end.

        We can do better than this and it needs to happen now. Its already too late, but we can help slow the damage to our planet if we act quickly.

        Tired of these popularity contests when we’re literally living in a mass extinction.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          The US Constitution is not responsible for the 2-party duopoly. It actually grants us the freedom to have all the political parties we want, and corporate oligarchy has entrenched the current 2 parties. What we really need is corporate money banned from politics, starting with a reversal of Citizens United decision.

          • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            The Constitution was written in part by white men who owned slaves/supported slavery. It does not reflect what America is today.

            The two-party system has held American with a tight grip since the early 1800s. It has done nothing but cause arguments about how much power the federal government should have or not. That argument will continue (and probably get worse) until the USA can embrace having the full support of all of its people. Elected officials are not the answer to this. At the moment, they are people who have time/money to participate in political activities. They generally aren’t aware of what this country is really going through. They only focus on a certain set of issues that they have the passion for. Rarely are they able to properly address other issues, so they end up taking their own party’s stance.

            America was never designed to have parties. In fact, it was said that we should avoid having them at all.

            • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              We also are no longer constrained by horses and written mail. We have significantly changed how communication works and idk why we can’t have a direct democracy nowadays.

    • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      5 months ago

      I will take weekend at Bernie’s in the White House with people who actually understand policies over fascist bat shit crazy any day. Not even a discussion for me.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Since literally anyone will be Not Trump then can we have someone actually good? That way we’d have “not Trump” and “actually good” both working for us! Win win!

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s just not flying with the ~100,000 people who are actually going to decide this election. They aren’t going to vote Biden. Polling is making this very clear over the last week or so.

    • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 months ago

      During Premier Trump’s reign, on Reddit, that picture preview always pointed the way to the most roaring political dumpster fires.

  • sploosh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    189
    ·
    5 months ago

    The funny thing is that Biden’s had gaffes like this his whole career and could have laughed it off under other circumstances, but with the eyes of the entire world on him watching for him to have another senior moment this is another nail in the coffin.

    • resin85@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      5 months ago

      Trump at a rally this week: “Mothers will never again be forced to watch their children overdosing & hosp–lee. We will never allow mothers to watch their child hopelessly dying in their arms, screaming, ‘What can I do? Help me God, what can I do?’ We are a nation whose once revered airports are a dirty, crowded mess.”

      Has any media covered that word vomit?

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Biden has been dogshit in general for his entire career. Not sure why the party pushed so hard for him in 2020.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    5 months ago

    I remember when Biden was picked as Obama’s VP, and everyone laughed because he’s known to make gaffes like this.

    Obviously, there’s a lot of scrutiny on him, but let’s not pretend it’s all because he’s too old. It’s just Biden being Biden, and while he’s probably too old for the job, that’s what happens when you don’t impose upper age limits…

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not just “biden being biden” by a longshot. He is 81 and significantly worse.

      We are rightly worried he’s going to lose against trump.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          His voting base doesn’t care if they’re led by an unfit leader.

          Be better than them.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            4 months ago

            The choices are

            • Be “better” and help Trump win, or
            • Help Trump lose

            Seems like an easy choice to me.

            • FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 months ago

              Even as a vegetable, Biden’s administration wouldn’t let the country fall into a kleptocracy. And that’s enough for me.

              • hark@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                Letting the country fall into a kleptocracy is exactly what Biden and his democratic party handlers are doing with their insistence of “nothing would fundamentally change” by pushing through the weakest presidential candidates and placing the status quo over actual progress.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              It is not nearly so binary. This issue is complex and intertwining - think rocket science where to get more thrust you need more fuel, but adding more fuel adds more weight, so you need even more thrust… that’s mere child’s play compared to politics.

              For one thing, replacing Biden now may help Trump win, but it may also help Trump lose, whereas in contrast NOT replacing Biden now may help Trump lose, or it could help Trump win.

              And somehow, we’re all back to everything Everything, EVERYthing being all about Trump, all the time.:-( Democracy has had cracks in it forever, especially when mixed with capitalism, and he exposes all of those.

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                The voters can’t replace Biden, and as I’ve mentioned in another comment, they’re not making these decisions blindly. They’ve likely come to the conclusion that replacing Biden would cost more votes than it’d gain. Right or wrong, they’re not going in blindly.

                All the voters can do is vote. And realistically, on election day, a vote not made for Biden is a vote in Trump’s favour.

                If you’re okay with that, that’s your decision. But I believe Trump has said that if it were up to him, the genocide would’ve been “completed” by now.

                • hark@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  The voters couldn’t even practically choose anyone other than Biden in that sham of a primary. People were warning about Biden since long before the primary and yet democratic party leadership decided they knew better than the voters and forced him through. Now you’re blaming their fuck up on voters.

                • OpenStars@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  The general election isn’t for another four months. That is the time to STFU and vote. Although who are we kidding, >90% of people live somewhere where their votes barely matter if at all - maybe, maybe helping Trump voters see that Biden’s re-election is “real”, but otherwise every city will vote Dem and every rural area will vote Repub and there’s like 10 counties that will determine the course of the entire world for the foreseeable future. Btw I’m not worried about either me or you, but I am worried about the independents in those 10 counties.

                  Our news media is out for blood, like sharks in the water. Right or wrong, or left or whatever, they don’t care, they smell PROFIT to be made by ruthlessly making fun of every tiny thing that Biden will do from now on. We ignore this at our peril - I’m not saying that I take evil glee from this horrid fact, merely that this inconvenient truth should be accounted for. We can bow before facts, or we can be crushed by them in turn - but either way, we will have to reconcile with them. The choice is whether we do so before, and use them to turn the situation to our advantage as best we can, or whether we wake up some day later wishing that we had done so previously. Exactly like 2016 with Hillary, or like that other time with RBG, but this time there will be no second chances, bc this at least looks to be our last election. Maybe second to last, possibly with yet another interspersal of another Dem, but there are no guarantees for such - Trump has already declared his intentions to become a dictator, and SCOTUS has already made it legal for him to do so.

                  And in the midst of all of this, with the stakes higher than they’ve ever been for our little democracy experiment… Biden, well, “has a cold”. Okay then, so hype up on crack, cocaine, or whatever you need to do, just get it done, or move aside and let Gavin Newsom or Pete Buttigieg or AOC or Gretchen Whitmer or whoever take the lead. This is not the time to be playing authoritian games with our literal democracy at stake. BuT hE’s OuR lEaDeR? Then LEAD. He’s old - it’s not his fault, but the Democratic primary choosing him would be our fault.

                  I agree that they had some kind of strategy in place. It relied on deception. It failed. Now that the cat is out of the bag, and we all saw what has been happening with our very own eyes and heard it with our very own ears, the strategy of telling everyone “he’s fine, you don’t see it but behind closed doors everything is totally fine, I totally have a girlfriend, you don’t know her bc she goes to another school, in fact she’s in Canada, but we are totally happy together… t-t-totally, yeah!” - this approach (!?!), is backfiring.

                  People are tire of being lied to. They won’t vote. Trump now has a greater likelihood of winning. That’s… no bueno.:-( Maybe we should do something about it? Something other than simply saying “what are you going to do?”, before it’s too late and nothing is all that can be done, as it gets even later in the game. It might be time to update the strategy, to fit the new set of updated facts. Otherwise, we roll the dice and hope for the best - but now is our last chance to affect change, if we really do want to see Trump not win?

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  All the voters can do is vote.

                  And protest, and contact representatives, and organize, and join their local party… Again with the national party lines meant to make people disengage.

              • hogmomma@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                replacing Biden now may help Trump win, but it may also help Trump lose, whereas in contrast NOT replacing Biden now may help Trump lose, or it could help Trump win.

                Either that quote doesn’t really mean anything, or maybe I’m missing the nuance to it.

                • OpenStars@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Both action or inaction may either increase or lessen the likelihood of either outcome. Hence why politics is more complex than rocket science - think quantum entanglement.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              No. This is an either/or fallacy the DNC has been pushing for over a year to quell any dissent. Well the chickens have come home to roost. We can apply pressure to change the candidate. That’s an option. We do not have to have either Trump or Biden and nothing else.

              • irreticent@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                It’s interesting to see all the pro-Trump accounts suddenly change their talking points to “Biden should step down.” It makes you wonder…

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Oh joy. That’s a new one. Nobody has ever called me a pro Trump person for attempting to remind people that there are other options. Never before.

                  Just kidding. This is exactly how we got here. People like you bullying anyone that dares talk about Biden having electability issues. It was too effective and now we’re in this dumb position that could have been avoided so easily.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          5 months ago

          People aren’t going to vote for Trump over Biden, they are just going to sit out. America doesn’t have mandatory voting.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            5 months ago

            If those people are fine with Trump being president, then that’s on them. Sitting out instead of voting against Trump is helping Trump win.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              You can blame them if you want, but the original push is from Biden and the DNC’s failures and support for genocide.

              The point is, Biden is tanking, so swapping him is better. Defending Biden hurts DNC chances.

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                5 months ago

                support for genocide

                The same genocide that Trump supports, likely more than Biden?

                If the genocide in Palestine was someone’s single issue, they’d be pretty disappointed if Trump were making decisions about the Palestine…

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  People aren’t voting for Trump, they just won’t for Biden. America isn’t a mandatory voter country, so actively contributing to genocide hurts the DNC’s chances by disengaging voters, not by flipping them to Trump.

              • rekorse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                “Excuse excuse excuse, I feel bad voting for Biden so I won’t”

                Very inspiring. What other emotions do you have trouble dealing with?

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s impossible to dintinguish when Trump makes mistakes from when he’s genuinely lieing or confidently incorrect.

        • Asifall@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          5 months ago

          True, but I feel like people have been talking past each other about this.

          On the one hand, you have people saying Biden’s cabinet would do a better job than Trump, which is true. On the other hand, you have people saying Biden is going to lose to trump unless he somehow makes a dramatic turnaround in the next couple months, which is also true according to all available data.

          The real question isn’t whether Biden is better than trump, it’s whether Biden would serve the country better by stepping down.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 months ago

            Exactly. Biden is a lost cause electorally, regardless of how good or bad he is, because he has tanked his approval with his own voterbase. Nobody is going to see Biden and then vote for Trump, they would just sit out or vote third party. Biden is just handing the win to Trump.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Nobody is going to see Biden and then vote for Trump,

              I am not so certain of that. Granted the numbers would be low, but given how the Electoral College works, the entire election may hinge upon precisely that.

              We’ve been down this road before, in both of the previous elections.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                The number is non-zero, sure, but close to it. “Nobody” is just to drive the point, the DNC’s best path to victory is to reengage their voterbase with popular policy and firmly standing against genocide. The “fall in line” narrative works for only so many people, and it may not be enough for the DNC to win, so the DNC should focus on voter outreach instead of fearmongering about Trump for a third election cycle in a row.

          • OpenStars@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Except that’s not the real question, bc he’s already said that God Himself could not cause Biden to step down (I’m being literal here). He’s doubling, tripling, and whatever more down, digging his heels in and refusing to even consider that option, regardless of who asks.

            At this point he is either removed by force - which won’t happen - or it’s already over.

            And either way, the SCOTUS ruling holds firm.

            I wish him luck, but I don’t expect good things to come. Even if he wins, heck even if he like rigged the election at this point and gave himself a large majority of numbers in the process, the other side won’t believe it and there’s a goodly chance of an actual civil war, or something along those lines (bad riots or such). Or maybe I’m full of shit, but it bothers me so much that everything that I say sounds “fatalistic” to my own inner ear - except that word means closing your eyes to the truth and choosing to believe only the worst, whereas this is my attempt to be realistic with eyes wide open!? I am saying that it does not bode well that this seems a realistic possibility rather than hyperbolic exaggeration of words for like comedic effect:-(.

            Once again, there’s like ~11% of the country who is die-hard Trump red maga, another ~11% Biden blue maga, and the LARGE majority of us in the middle don’t matter in the slightest as we get caught between these two extremes (Russian oligarchy encroachment vs. American oligarchy establishment, tbf the latter cares far more about the common folk, but is really bad at showing that).

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          as Jon Stewart also pointed out, but that’s not the issue here. the issue is expected performance. people expect want one of them to be a crazy loon. the other not so much. so when he acts like he’s not all there people are concerned whether he can perform well enough at the election to defeat the fascist. the polls aren’t optimistic.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Um… let me be clear. My former VP pick has always sucked. He’s not old. He’s simply got a head full of busted marbles and wasn’t employable anywhere outside of the US Senate. That’s why I endorsed him to run in 2020. You people disgust me. You deserve what you get.”

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      So I should be able to look at 2020 debate footage and compare it to 2024 debate footage without a problem right?

      Right?!?

      This isn’t just gaffes. The man is getting to an age where this stuff get harder every year. There’s a reason the military has a mandatory retirement age of 62, even if you have a desk job.

    • nekandro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s a concern because Putin, Xi, Khamenei, Kim… They’re all well-spoken. They’re all quick-witted.

      What kind of message does that send would-be American allies in Asia, in the Middle East, in Africa, in South America?

      • Xtallll
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        I didn’t realize WW3 was going to be decided by a rap battle.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          “This battle is NOT going to be decided by facts!” Omg some of best YouTube videos of all time (for someone who has knowledge of the circumstances) :-P

      • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That America is powerful enough to elect a mentally deficient geriatric to it’s supreme office and still be something not to fuck with?

  • Gsus4@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Guys, I’m not american, but at least today answering the press questions (no teleprompter) Biden was dishing out wisdom about economics and geopolitics and very thoughtful…he is just not very good with the whole “slick reality show clown president to distract the cattle while you rob them” part :/

      • Plopp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Or is it what media outlets want, for sensationalism and clicks, which in turn makes it all the voters focus on because there is nothing else?

        Edit: Eh, writing this I apparently thought they wrote more/other things than they did. Ah well, I’ll keep the comment up as a piece of history from my past.

    • EnderWiggin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah Biden has always said stupid shit too, but you’re not going to convince most people of that. They will assume it’s due to senility. I’d say that’s certainly part of it, but it’s also par for the course for Biden.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    He was just asked about his confidence in Kamala to be able to beat Trump, should he be succeeded(sp?)… and he referred to Trump as his VP and then meandered into some vague talking points.

    • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      5 months ago

      I thought you were trolling, like in a “you have to double check if I’m bullshitting you now” kind of way. But it’s actually true… and unlike his Putin remark he didn’t seem to even notice he said it.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Its only been getting worse as this post conference pressser has gone on.

        He has forgotten entirely to respond to parts of a multipart question, meandered into basically ‘I sat down with Golda Meir and Yitsak Rabin and we accomplished peace!’, just keeps repeating things he did (some of which are legitimate accomplishments) that have little to do with the questions asked…

        … “You said your presidency would be a bridge to younger candidates, what happened to that?”

        Rambles about being in the Senate a really long time

        … at one point he actually said, outloud, ‘How do I not make this seem self centered?’ before answering a ‘Considering the stakes, do you really think you should run?’ type of question.

        In the time I have been typing this he has basically barked in anger after a short response to a question that was followed by the reporter asking ‘thats all?’.

        He also keeps doing the sort of asshole loud whisper sarcasm voice.

        He is coming off as a sundowning angry old man who doesn’t want his car keys taken away.

        • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yes and it’s really getting to the point where it undoubtedly impacts his ability to perform without an aide basically at his side at all times. Imagine him telling another world leader something insane and the translator having to jump in correct him. Or worse, how can you be sure something he did mean to say was actually something he meant to say and not just another mistake? That kind of communication failure is very dangerous at the highest level.

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 months ago

            Man, imagine being the White House translator the next four years. Whoever wins, you’ll be stuck there looking apologetically at the guests going “sorry dude, IDK either”.

          • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yes, I spoke with someone earlier today about how communication is VITAL to being president. If he can’t communicate, he can’t do his job.

        • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, his emotional regulation is pretty bad now too. He was always a seemingly calm, nice old man and now he’s gotten petty, blames his staff for errors (very unlike him), and in general is acting really off.

      • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yes, I think the people here claiming Biden is as sharp now as 4 years ago, that he’s always made these “gaffes,” must either 1) not have watched him actually make these errors to see how bad they were 2) do not remember how sharp he was comparatively 4 years ago and/or 3) have never been around someone with cognitive decline and don’t recognize how serious it is.

        And the Putin remark - he caught himself, but still couldn’t remember Zelensky’s name. And he’s met Zelenksy a few times, he should know him.

      • Mobilityfuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean… it was pretty bad but also clearly a slip of tongue as it didn’t confuse the sentence or message - not great though , fuck the DNC

  • Dearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    5 months ago

    The aged president with a stutter says something wrong in public again.

    Whatever

      • Dearth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        It sure is. It’s probably gotten worse with age. Stress also triggers stutters. Knowing he’s under intense scrutiny from all sides on every word he speaks in public probably makes it worse. Especially after a lifetime of dealing with pudding brains associating a speech delay with failing mental acuity.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          As you say, a stutter makes getting the words out difficult. It doesn’t make you mix up world leaders.

        • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Stutter and aphasia are two completely separate phenomena in the brain. Biden isn’t stuttering; he is mixing up names of people and can’t remember their names. Mixing up Trump vs Kamala, Putin vs Zelensky (with Z literally standing next to him!!) - that’s not a stutter.

  • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    A saddening phenomenon that’s likely to happen if this continues … is people opening up about how they saw the decline way before the debate but presumed it was a “one off” or “bad night”. I think it’s already started somewhat.

    But the picture that could emerge with pretty high clarity is that “the issue” was covered by an inner group and ignored by those peripherally exposed to it … all instead of the party preparing for it, preparing new potential candidates, and taking seriously the notion from Biden in 2020 that he wouldn’t run in 2024.

    Losing to Trump a second time by sticking to a party elder is going to be a big deal (if it happens of course). It will probably look more like the Dems losing than trump winning, and it prob will look like the Dems allowing it all to happen out of hubris and stupidity, not unlike the RBG fuck up. Could seriously shake the party up?

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      And also the entire Hillary fiasco, where she barely campaigned in midwestern states. I wonder if they are truly so wealthy and disconnected as to literally not realize what is going on - for them, the economy is “fine” and so everything is hunky-dory, so if they plan on losing rather than put in someone that they don’t feel that they have as much control over as Biden, then… that might be the end of democracy. Heck, that SCOTUS ruling is already in the past now - maybe they are ready to end the fiction that our votes matter any longer?

      • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yea, that the term “Blue MAGA” has arisen out of this is kinda telling. Once you see it in the “Biden is our president, if you’re not voting for him you’re part of the problem” types, you can’t unsee it.

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you’re not voting for “not Trump” then you are part of the problem. Lesser perhaps than the party refusing to replace an old man and the old man refusing to step down but the problem is and will remain conservatives(i.e. american “moderates”)and facism.

          That “not Trump” doesn’t (and shouldn’t) have to be Biden. But in this shitty system we have that’s your choices. Sebile old man slowly degrading democracy or demented old man’s facist dictatorship. The democracy is always the better choice.

          • OpenStars@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 months ago

            (1) the election isn’t for SEVERAL months from now, right now we cannot vote for anyone at all.

            (2) part of the problem or not, it is a plain fact that many people won’t vote for Biden. Some of those likely will vote for Trump no matter what, while others may vote for someone else who is younger. The more Biden declines between now vs. the next few months, the more people will fall into this category. Especially if the worst should come to pass and he dies.

            (3) the SCOTUS ruling is already in the past - we are already no longer a democracy, whatever name we use to describe the situation. Henceforth we have elected kings that are no longer bound by the collective Will of the People (after being elected), while Congress sells itself to the highest bidder in our plutocracy, thereby again ignoring the Will of the People, and since the Supreme Court also ignores the Will of the People, the fiction that we are a “democracy” is wearing thinner by the hour.

            But we cannot control others, only ourselves, which is why it is important to do the right thing and put our absolute best foot forward. If you think Biden is doing that, like if he just has a cold and he’ll get over it soon (fingers crossed!) then great. Many others do not think that though, and again some subset of those will not vote for him, but who might otherwise vote for a Democratic candidate. Perhaps I’m wrong - we’ll see.

          • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Democrats are conservative as well, just not as regressive or conservative as Republicans. Dems are right of center, especially if you compare left/right parties globally

        • HappyStarDiaz@real.lemmy.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh yea Cult Jr is a real thing right now. Which I could life with IF IT WASN’T SO DAMN CLEAR BIDEN WILL NOT WIN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE no matter how much Blue Maga Cult Jr berates us. I’m voting for Joe if I have to ya dims, it isn’t who you have to convince and your cult Jr bullshit sure ain’t gonna.

        • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Isn’t it funny how the Dem talking points often actively discourage people from voting for them? Reminds me of how church groups force people to proselytize, specifically to piss off those people, so they can come back to the church and be told ‘See? All those other people are bad, mean, and stupid. You belong here with us.’

          Except the Dems are doing it to feed their personal moral or intellectual narcissism. It was never about getting votes for that type in the first place - they just wanna feel superior. Which is also why their talking points usually involve guilt trips or other sophistry/bad faith arguments - because they are using this as a proxy to enact narcissistic abuse. If Dems were forced to argue a real position, they would have to become leftists through that honest argumentation (reality has a leftwing bias). There’s a reason none of them are leftists (Dems are centrists). There are talking points from the 70s and 60s they could be picking up, progressive ideas like child care for all (which used to be something Republicans favored)- the point is to prevent progress while being as narcisstically proud of that as possible.

          And truly, narcissism and moral degradation have really really really fucked up our country. And by moral degradation, I mean we’ve become a disrespectful country, almost no community (because we sold it for capital), abusive, and PROUD of that abuse. That’s the only way a man with 34 felonies, who’s raped numerous adult women AND CHILDREN INCLUDING A 12 YEAR OLD, could be a candidate for president.

          It disgusts me.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean, I don’t think this old babbling windbag should be the candidate either.

        But my thing is, who do the democrats even have to run in place of him? Kamala would lose in a landslide because this is the US and she’s a woman of color (not to mention a cop, so you lose both the left and the “centrist” closeted racist dems and anyone that was still somehow weighing a trump vote (they exist, somehow)), and everyone else in the party has limited appeal. Not to mention the incumbent advantage.

        We shouldn’t be in this position, no matter what. But we are. And we have to face facts that giving up the standard white guy, which is the only kind of candidate that has ever won (except that one time, but that’s seeming more and more like a fluke) with the power of incumbency at his back is a massive gamble. We can’t afford Biden fucking this up as bad as he is. But I don’t know if we can afford a wildcard either, which is exactly what a totally different candidate would be.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Four years ago, his age was already a factor. We’ve had four years to build someone else up. Someone who is not even connected to the Gaza situation. Even as a backup option, just in case Biden were to have died, let’s say already by now. Four years. Four summers, four winters, four springs, four falls.

          The conservatives tried and failed miserably, with Desantis, and Nikki Haley, etc. but the liberals… I don’t recall even so much as trying?

          But we could - AOC, Buttigieg, Newsom - there are many to choose from (edit: we could even let them compete - a “debate” if you will - and then pick the best one!). Instead, it looks an awful lot like we are choosing either Trump, or even if Biden barely pulled it off, the numbers would not be convincing to the election deniers.

          Just like in 2016, except somehow doubled down even more so, we choose to stick our heads in the sand and hope for the best, while putting forth zero effort to try to bring about a less-worse outcome? FAAFO I guess, bc we gotta keep going through this same scenario over and over again, until we either learn, or democracy itself gets taken from us by the grown-ups (meaning those willing to expend effort towards reaching their goals, though not necessarily the good guys, and to be clear in this case they are very very evil ones).

          • TheFriar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Their plan was Kamala. She was their backup option. She is young and the entire discussion when she was chosen was how she would be there when Biden steps down or backs out after four years like he said he was going to do. I’m not saying she was at all a good choice. She has too much baggage and nowhere near broad appeal. Is it pathetic that some of that has to do with her being a woman? And a woman of color at that? Of fucking course. But I don’t think the democrats even really acknowledge that out of fear of it ever being leaked that it was discussed and the news cycle being weeks of “dems racist.” Its performative bullshit. I think they desperately want to be the party to elect the first woman, and they were willing to back door her via Biden. But that’s a stupid plan that doesn’t get to the heart of the issue of our lack of diversity in executive politics.

            But here we are, just like we had with Ginsberg. She was too stubborn to step down when she was clearly dying. And we got a lifetime appointment in Barrett. Now, Biden is refusing to step down and we’re about to get a lifetime sentence of emperor trump.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              The trutly heart-breaking fact of all of this is that the election is breaking down along the lines of which flavor of fascism you want? Both sides also represent neoliberalism - one being the American form and the other being the more Russian variant.

              I am starting to see the Yin & Yang of it all, and like Trump lies to people’s faces, yet in doing so he more honestly gives his particular base what they want (they are mean, vindictive, and crass, so taunting “Baby Killer!” is what they enjoy), while in contrast Biden at least tried to tell the truth, yet as you suggested in a manner as to selectively hide certain other inconvenient truths, but in so doing he failed to play to his own base. Biden from 20 years ago would have done amazing at this, it seems like. Whereas now… well, “he has a cold” (that will not end anytime in the next 5 years).

              Dems are nowhere close to being “liberal”, but they really will lead the country better than the Russian transplanted culture that some are trying (successfully) to import. That is, if they can get elected, which the Blue Magas - like their red counterparts - are flat-out ignoring, seems less likely by the day.

              Oh well, “We the People” have no say in any of this. Or at least, that is the story that we are being told, across all forms of social media, including, sadly, the Fediverse as well (I am surprised that your and my comment does not have tens of downvotes already - it seems like the brigade is getting fatigued and not willing to chase down every comment that expresses the slightest doubt about Biden and pounce upon it). So just like with RBG, and even more like Hillary 2016, we will see what happens, I guess!? Those who refuse to learn from their history are doomed to repeat it, “but I’m sure that everything will work out fine this time!” (/s, though genuinely would be true if interpreted as a statement of hope rather than certainty as it says)

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Clooney said Biden isn’t the same man from 2020. Whatever is going on … never mind his age … is getting worse/more difficult to handle.

      It’s time for him to recognise that.

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Not just the RBG fuckup, but also them backing Hillary and openly saying they don’t have to hold fair primary elections re: Bernie, and they kinda fucked up with Gore too

    • bigFab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The all-anti-Trump voters reasoning is that a 2 yo pot smoking chimpance would do better off. So they elect it.

      I feel sorry for u americans, u’r truly fucked up anyways.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 months ago

    Biden: Refuses to step down after a dismal electoral debate performance that makes people think he should be in a care home and not in the White House.

    Also Biden: Wrongly introduces Zelenskyy with the same name as the Jasper Carrott looking dictator who invaded his country two years ago.

  • testfactor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    Heck, 15 years ago, way back in 2009, Obama said, “During the second hundred days, I will learn to go off the teleprompter and Joe Biden will learn to stay on the teleprompter.”

    The dude hasn’t been able to keep his words straight for a while…

    But the timing is… very poor to say the least…

    • Reyali@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I didn’t know that so I looked it up. Source

      “In the next hundred days, I will learn to go off the prompter and Joe Biden will learn to stay on the prompter.”

      That’s good to know!