Did he do it for the memes?

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think this is a dangerous attitude. He’s made some gaffs recently but overall has not been a terrible person or leader. Supporting the possibility of dropping a candidate this late in the game especially when there are no super star saviors waiting in the wings is the kind of party weakness the GOP would eat up and is a recipe for failure. You don’t have to love him at this point, but it’s too late to start over, just suck it up make a donation to his campaign and vow to become more involved in political change at earlier levels so hopefully we are not in this mess again.

    • VintageTech@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m voting Joe because he is still the only qualified candidate for the job. The package he brings is a Vice President who could do the job if he were to step down due to health/age concerns to guarantee a female President as his dream come true. She then gets to pick her Vice President which should absolutely be AOC. The opposition has no convincing argument to draw this out in a court as they would need to present their arguments to AOC for rebuttal,

      It’s just so batshit crazy it can’t fail.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m voting Joe because he is still the only qualified candidate for the job.

        There’s a couple of hundred million other qualified candidates in the US. If you’re looking for politicial experience, there’s several hundred in Washington alone.

        Dems have totally failed to bring through the next two or three generations of candidates. That the party feels that he’s their only choice is shameful.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Since when has the opposition needed convincing arguments to drag things out? They’ll come up with whatever bullshit they want just to keep stuff from moving forward until they get the ball again.

    • Asifall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      He has been a terrible candidate though. If the polling is accurate and trump has a slight lead in popular vote, Biden has less than a 5% chance of winning the election (according to Nate Silver’s models). Unfortunately, this is probably optimistic as polling has overestimated the democratic vote in the last 2 presidential elections including the one that included these same two candidates.

      • HappyStarDiaz@real.lemmy.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nate Silver is terrible and usually terribly wrong, but just step outside the last year and it’s been crystal clear Biden would and will 100% lose the Electoral College to Dump. No amount of Cult Jr telling us to just vote blue no matter who is going to change that. Most Americans don’t know the difference between a row and a column or a watch and a warning, they aren’t thinking critically about Presidential elections.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s so ironic to see the “vote blue no matter who” people argue against replacing Biden when data shows a high probability of him losing. If they suggest we vote blue no matter who then why are they so ardently telling us that it has to be this one guy?

          • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            “the data” would also suggest that a late replacement could be destructive and have an even Higher probability of losing. More importantly the process to oust Biden is highly unlikely to succeed. Therefore the very act of pushing for these kinds of changes only demonstrates weakness for the GOP and accomplishes nothing but push away any remaining undecided voters toward a party that at least has a clear favorite. I wish people would support the current candidate more aggressively rather than destructively attempt for replacement when doing so is futile.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              While you are at it, you might also wish for people to vote Blue. It’s not going to happen though - independents refuse to tow a particular party line, preferring instead for candidates to earn their votes, and they will watch the world burn, or even turn to Trump to help it, rather than give in. This is what true democracy looks like - sometimes people lose, when enough people on the other side vote to win. We can only control ourselves - e.g. if the Dems were to pick a replacement, there may be a better chance, while otherwise we simply sit back and roll the dice to see whatever happens.

          • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Who will replace him? Michelle Obama doesn’t want to run, Gavin Newsom has full support for Biden, and Kamala Harris is already VP.

            • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’m sure plenty of people would step up if he actually stepped down. What you’re seeing now is people doing damage control to keep from undermining his campaign. It doesn’t mean that they’re actually telling us their true beliefs. Newsom says he fully supports Biden, and if he stepped down, Newsom would fully support whomever took his place.

              I think Harris is just as bad of a candidate as Biden or Clinton. Michelle Obama is an option but I don’t see why we have to treat this like a TV reboot where we keep rehashing the same names and faces that we saw previously. I’d personally love Bernie or AOC, but I know the party leadership hates leftist candidates and will actively work against them, so we’re probably screwed either way just like we were in 2016.