• HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 hours ago

    What’s wrong with #ffffff?

    Somehow when we had only 16 colours to work with we didn’t have the worst of the designer-brain “grey on marginally different grey” eyestrain factories. High-enough contrast for accessinility was essentially guaranteed. And you could go even more restrictive for laptops with early washed out LCDs and only-shades-of-red plasma screens.

    • KitB@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Full-contrast black-on-white is also a common eye strain and/or migraine trigger.

      • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Would white-on-black cause the same problem or fix it? I’ve been curious about this kinda thing for a while, but never curious enough to research it since it’s never affected me.

        • KitB@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’m honestly not sure; I expect it varies from person to person. I certainly find it difficult to look at either way around.

    • drosophila
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_term

      A named color is just a term for an arbitrary range of light frequencies, and different cultures differentiate between different ranges. Especially when you get into more specific named colors like “indigo” or “chartreuse”. In fact “indigo” made its way into English from Portuguese and “chartreuse” from French.

      I don’t speak Japanese, but these could very well be “Japanese colours”.