野麦さん@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196English · 14 days agoIntel rulelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1216
arrow-up1216imageIntel rulelemmy.dbzer0.com野麦さん@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196English · 14 days agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareresipsaloquitur@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-214 days agoI’m all for open ISAs, but one of these can be licensed at reasonable rates and the other sued AMD for making the 64-but instruction set architecture that Intel should have made.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·14 days agohelp who’s who? there’s three mamufacturers in the meme and I’m woefully uninformed
minus-squareresipsaloquitur@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·13 days agoArm licenses ISAs and designs. It doesn’t manufacture anything.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·13 days agosorry, right. I still don’t know who sued AMD, I assume intel?
minus-squareDraconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·13 days agoIt was Intel. Stagnating CPU monopoly they are.
I’m all for open ISAs, but one of these can be licensed at reasonable rates and the other sued AMD for making the 64-but instruction set architecture that Intel should have made.
help who’s who? there’s three mamufacturers in the meme and I’m woefully uninformed
Arm licenses ISAs and designs. It doesn’t manufacture anything.
sorry, right. I still don’t know who sued AMD, I assume intel?
It was Intel. Stagnating CPU monopoly they are.