It’s not an overwhelming trend but I have noticed more AI/LLM content and comments on this sub compared to the old one (to be clear, most of it is suspected only and not significant enough to be provable). I have reported the most obvious and provable one so far which you can see here if interested.

No hate or negativity though ❤️ Thanks and respect to our mods; let’s just please keep our eyes open; part of what has always made this community beautiful is interacting with diverse people and their human voices!

  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Edit: I misunderstood a mod DM and I am allowed to post call outs of examples so here you are: https://lemmy.cafe/comment/9664400

    Yes, here unfortunately. I report the obvious ones but the mod team’s action process is clearly flawed as one super obvious one got left up. Hoping this post can be an encouragement for change! :)

    • idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That’s a comment not a post.

      And your reasoning doesn’t sound good, I never used an “AI detection websites”, but generating an outline of an article is not the same as generating new-ish content based on a prompt.

      LLMs are tools. There are good usecases which fit for them, like creating an outline of a long article, it can be seen as an accessibility tool, it can help people with ADHD read long articles.

      And there are bad usecases like creating memes and shitty illustrations, and nonsense stories. Don’t be a luddite just because some people use a tool for the wrong thing. The comment you link doesn’t sound to me LLM generated at all, some people write like that, with hashtags and emojies. Why should I trust YOUR ai tool to always correctly detect another AI tool?

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Silly goose I never said it was a post. 😝

        Thank you for your insight. I disagree with all of your analysis. Plus it’s the rule of the community. I have no problem with AI content in communities that allow it.

        • idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s not an overwhelming trend but I have noticed a spike in AI/LLM contentand comments

          Maaaaan you write this up there. I copied this from the top of this page, from your post. You call ONE COMMENT “a spike in content and comments”

          What is content if you have to differenciate it from comment? You couldn’t show us a single post in this thread, a mod said there was one, NOT YOU.

          Don’t call me a goose, this is a friendly community and you are fighting a nonexistant enemy. Please stop.

          • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Hi! This is valid criticism and I would edit my post but currently my instance is having issues with that—I have reached out to my admin. (fixed and edited! thanks again for pointing out my mistake)

            When I say “spike” I mean in content that I suspect of being LLM. To date, there has been only one comment which I believe I can prove was AI which is what I posted above. Sorry for the inclarity there—that is totally my fault.

            I am sorry you were hurt by me calling you silly. It was the kindest way I could think of to efficiently tell you you were unfairly putting words in my mouth :) It was hurtful for you to do that