CubitOom@infosec.pub to 196English · 7 days agoHow do you ruleinfosec.pubimagemessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1361file-text
arrow-up1361imageHow do you ruleinfosec.pubCubitOom@infosec.pub to 196English · 7 days agomessage-square95fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejonsnothere@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up16·7 days agoThere’s like a not insignificant 1% of people who are intersex where looking at chromosomes can get tricky.
minus-squareAnonomousWolf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 days agoYea it’s not perfect, but it’s somewhat functional. Compared to what they decided to go with.
minus-squareGreyEyedGhost@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 days agoYou can be XY and present as female. There’s a handy little chart in this article to give you an overview of some of the more common things that happen between being an XX woman and being an XY man.
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·7 days agoSurely there are also people who can produce both/neither reproductive cells. Definitely neither, at least.
There’s like a not insignificant 1% of people who are intersex where looking at chromosomes can get tricky.
As if the right would care.
Yea it’s not perfect, but it’s somewhat functional. Compared to what they decided to go with.
You can be XY and present as female. There’s a handy little chart in this article to give you an overview of some of the more common things that happen between being an XX woman and being an XY man.
Surely there are also people who can produce both/neither reproductive cells. Definitely neither, at least.