Why is it always femme people this bullshit is directed at? Why aren’t the hyper masculine tattooed manosphere influencers ever chastised for their jingoistic tribal alt right nazi sigils engraved on their bodies?
Because graffiti is artwork you do on someone else’s property.
And in the maga brain, a man’s body is his own, but a woman’s body…¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I hate that this makes sense
Yup conservatives don’t see an individual happy with their own choices. They just think, “if that was my wife/daughter I’d restrict her freedoms so she wouldn’t have any tattoos.”
Well considering the common refrain from them recently was the question “What is a woman?” I have no confidence they even understand the concept of a femme body.
misogyny
In a word yes. And also the inherent threat of violence that allows for the patriarchy that precludes misogyny.
I just Googled “anti tattoo meme” and most of them were making fun of macho guys.
I’m sure this was rhetorical… But if not, I think you know why.
Graffiti is a spectrum: on one hand, you get beautiful murals that add something to the structure, making it more than what it was.
On the other hand, you get dicks and swastikas.
Tattoos are the same way. There’s a difference between someone having a beautiful sleeve done and someone who has TRUMP tattooed on their forehead.
An example to further your point: I have an album of these I took earlier this year. It was exciting to stumble across.
When I click the image, it flips over the X-axis. That’s weird as hell.
Same here, on sync.
Damn, I feel left out. Jerboa didn’t do it. I wonder what the difference was
Neither does Voyager
Speaking of Voyager, do you think New Glenn will launch on New Years Eve?
Never heard of that before 🤷
There is probably some info in the exif data that is being ignored by one and not the other.
There’s definitely a difference between guerilla art and “fuckup was here.”
I was stuck at some train tracks in my area, and some of the graffiti on the trains left a gap around the safety information about weight limits and such.
Not all of them did. Those that didn’t had to be painted over and re-written, but only the safety section. They left the rest alone.
There was some mutual acceptance happening on both sides of the effort that warmed my heart.
As a graffiti enthusiast, I can say that is definitely part of “the rules”. Graffiti has a code of conduct, depite it appearing like anarchy. Many new writers are ignorant of it. Don’t tag:
- Personal property
- Places of religion
- Memorials
- Shipping or cargo data (like those train cars)
- Places that are kept clean/painted (it’s going to get covered frequently)
This explains why the liquor store down the street has a Jesus mural on the side.
No no, they have a point.
I don’t see any nazi iconography in the image OP posted, can you point them out to me?
I was applying the claim to something else
If you are talking about graffiti on buildings then you haven’t been to Frankfurt if you’ve not seen nazi imagery
I was applying the claim to something else
What are you applying the claim to?
Why the reference to illegal Nazi iconography in Frankfurt? The building posted looks to me to be in the contiguous US.
You posted an image of a person’s mugshot who has a swastika on their forehead and I assumed you were conflating their tattoos to the person in the original image of this post.
What are you applying the claim to?
People with nazi tattoos
Why the reference to illegal Nazi iconography in Frankfurt? The building posted looks to me to be in the contiguous US.
I thought you might not have known racist graffiti existed
were conflating their tattoos to the person in the original image of this post.
Oh no, nothing about her. Just the “Tattoos = graffiti, guys” part was applied to the person I posted
Oh ok, sorry for the misunderstanding on my part. Thanks for the clarification.
The building is most likely in São Paulo. Not that it matters for for the point you’re making :)
There’s no Portuguese in any of those tags. Three of the tags are east coast crews. If I were to have to put a location down I’d say North East Miami FL.
Well, look at this documentary and see if it might change your mind ;)
Is that a nazi prison gang sex slave? That’s pretty horrific.
God damn thats hot. Someone put a lot of work into that building.
he must work out
Call me whatever you want, but like anything else, too much of a good thing is bad for you.
You stuck up, half-witted, scruffy-looking, nerf herder!
🤣
Exactly.
All freedom to her, and I like tatoos, but I think her assortment of tattoos is a bit ugly.
Dispose of your body as you choose but there is a very fine line that parts complimenting from exagerating. The girl in the photo, for me, is already on exageration territory.
Too much ink, with too many tattoos, with no connecting theme, and taking up areas where ink - again, for me - just doesn’t sit right, like hands and throat.
But because opinions are worth nothing, this is all hot air escaping mouths.
I’d fuck that building.
I dunno, I bet it’s had thousands of people inside it.
Don’t slut shame that building!
The tatoos would not stop me.
Turn off the lights.
Keep ‘em on, get to read the funnies while bangin’
Tbh if done nice, i think they can even be attractive.
All these comments and not a single one telling me who she is. Smh my head
Reverse image search ftw https://www.instagram.com/bmarkhaa?igsh=MWJ1eTI1MmZnZjVrMw==
The best Christmas present I’ve gotten so far
how does this relate to the NSFW goth girl fetish community ?
I salute you for informing me of that community
Lemmy has NSFW content?! Since when?
I got you, buddy.
Perfection!
Porn? On the internet???
It’s also possible you’ve disabled NSFW content
If you have go to your instances website (if your on an app) and change it in your account settings, some clients also have a client side NSFW block
Please somebody be so kind and insert a picture of a skeleton covered in cobwebs with my handle stamped on it below my first comment.
That is how old I feel right now.
Sopuli.xyz defederates nsfw instances. And most nsfw stuff is on dedicated instance.
Guess I’ll have to consult the bones to see if it is worth the trouble to create another profile just for NSFW surfing.
I have different app for nsfw lemmy lol.
Voyager for this account, Eternity when I want to wank.
Plenty of mobile clients allow you to use multiple profiles simultaneously.
google “lemmynsfw” there’s a dedicated instance for NSFW
She would look way better without the tats. Even this shitty building would look better without this artless crap. And how is this a political take?
Comparing women to objects tends to be more frowned upon by civilized people, which excludes the right.
You’re welcome to find whatever you like attractive. She clearly doesn’t care about your opinion.
I’m sure my opinion is as worthless to her as hers is to me. And btw nobody is comparing the woman to the object, the point is that the aesthetic is similar. Applies to all sexes and objects. Imho the building tags are not art, or at least not good art. And her snakes, bugs and Japanese masks are so tired and trite, everyone does the same stuff. Yay.
Tired and trite? That sounds like most of mainstream movies, music, television… Yet people enjoy it. It is their choice to like what they like, and do what they do.
Sure someone else may want the ceiling of the Sistine chapel tattood on them, but she chose this.
I’m happy for her, she can do whatever she wants. She’s still hot af. And people can watch whatever shit they want and they can have all the dumb opinions they want. That doesn’t change how I see it, and I like to think that my criticism is constructive.
I’m glad you say she can do whatever she wants.
I think what many would argue is, what is and is not constructive about criticizing someone’s choices. I think it is constructive to tell someone that wearing a reflective device or bright clothing when in low visibility situations such as hunting (if others are in the area shooting like Dick Cheney) or walking near traffic is constructive. But I don’t see any ups to telling someone their clothing design doesn’t agree with my tastes.
Whether I care for her tattoos or not, they aren’t harming others outside of people being prudish and feeling like they don’t have enough control over others choices.
Well to be fair nobody here told her anything, she probably doesn’t know that some idiots are talking about her in some obscure corner of the internet. Way I see it we all should be able to criticise anything. Tattoos are a form of art and people are allowed to have opinions on it. Same goes for the “art” of tagging.
That’s just like, your opinion, man.
this Camaro is ruined! It’s covered in sharpie art!
…it’s still a Camaro
Donny, please
Because it’s essentially saying that her decision to get tattoos is the equivalent of her vandalizing her body. It’s a meme criticizing a woman for choosing what she wants to do with her body, which is just a tamer version of “your body my choice”.
I saw that more like a criticism of the tattooing style, not her life decisions. Your body my choice is downright authoritarian. I don’t see how it relates to this.
Even if it is a criticism of the tattooing style it’s still likening it to vandalism. It doesn’t change the message behind the meme.
See what you and I call vandalism on that building some call art.
And the meme completely breaks down if the building is considered art so let’s not play dumb. We both know in this meme the building isn’t representing art.
The meme suggests that this beautiful woman made herself less attractive by getting tattoos. People who tend to agree with that statement are not necessarily nazis fascists sexists Trump voters rapists church goers and so on, despite the fact that many of that ilk share similar sentiments (but for completely different reasons). Believe it or not, not everyone likes this aesthetic and this is not political.
If you think “I don’t like tattoos on women” is the same as “women with tattoos look like vandalized buildings” then you’re missing the nuances necessary to have this discussion.
She doesnt care how she looks for you.
While true…
It ain’t stopping nothing.
Your username would be better if it were a fruit
Your face would be better if it was in the sand
She makes much more sense when you undo the mirroring whichever dipshit created this did. The backwards texts in crazy fonts were breaking my brain.
I appreciate the commitment in both cases. Whoever climbed out to do the graffiti at the top of the building had some guts.
Some phones have mirroring enabled by default when taking selfies
Both looks bad. It’s too many tattoos on one hand, and pretty scrambled a bad looking graffiti on the other hand.
They don’t understand consent.
Exactly. We never agreed to put that guy in charge of the building; he just inherited it!
Her tattoos do specifically have that “Here’s a blank spot where I can put some shit” feel to them.
Like I’ve seen cool tattoos, hers aren’t. Shitty tattoos look like graffiti. And those aren’t even “I’ve got pieces of a BIC pen and some rubbing alcohol, you can draw, right?” shitty tattoos, those are “Hey man it’s your forehead. Keep this bandage dry for three days then wash it when you take a shower. That’ll be 80 bucks.” grade tattoos.
