• bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I once ran the windows Troubleshooter to get an old scanner working, and the final page told me to but a new scanner!

    I plugged it in to a mini PC I use as a backup server and the scanner worked fine with Linux.

    And another recommendation issue: I noticed that my Windows laptop has a “reduce your carbon footprint” settings section that tells me to reduce power settings, screen brightness etc. but it’s completely lacking a “stop giving me AI search results in Bing” section.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Win11 also says that showing seconds in the taskbar “reduces battery life”/“increases power consumption”

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The only time that would make a difference is if you’re staring at a blank page and the only thing causing the screen to update is the clock. Theoretically the GPU could go completely to sleep, except for having to draw the updated clock every second.

        But there’s a reason battery life is commonly measured as “hours of video playback”. If the laptop’s not actually doing anything you may as well turn it off and get weeks of battery life.

      • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        My god. It really does!

        Oh no! I left notepad.exe open. That cursor was flashing on and off for hours! I’m sorry everyone!

    • rubikcuber@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Switching from Windows to Linux on my Framework laptop makes my battery last 2-3 times as long. They should just have a switch to Linux recommendation to reduce your carbon footprint.

      • yonder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Are you using a framework 13? While I find the battery life to be usable, if it’s that much worse on Windows I’m not sure I would have gotten a framework if I used windows lol.

        • rubikcuber@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah. 11th gen Framework 13, so one of the first ones. Since I got it I had to use Windows exclusively because of some client work, and battery life was pitiful. 2-3 hours perhaps? Once that project finished I swapped out the SSD and put on Ubuntu with KDE. I was expecting the batter life to be worse, but it is demonstrably better. I now get more like 6 hours, albeit with my power plan on efficiency.

          • yonder@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I have one of the newer AMD models and I find it has about 2-3 hours of batter life, though it spends most of it’s time suspended for my use case. I use Fedora and have the “balanced” profile selected. I don’t mind the poor battery life since the processor is leaps and bounds better than the 6th gen 2 core Intel I was using before.

    • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      when microsoft feels threatened by the recycling community being noticed, they add more technical constraints. Chromebooks are the gold standard for an intentionally non recyclable machine, neck and neck with apple.

      • yonder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The bullshit of chromeOS to be capable of running on the shittiest hardware but having an artificial lifetime for devices is stupid. To google’s credit, they did increase that limit to 10 years, but that was only recently.

      • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes, and they’re encouraging people to throw it out. At least some users think to sell on the secondary market, but third party buyers can only get so much out of EOL Windows machines and there are only so many linux users with an interest in buying up old hardware.

        I myself have a couple of used laptops, but don’t need any more hardware for a while, so it’s not like I’m able to buy up any. I fear much of it will rot in a landfill.

    • Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 hours ago

      And it’s essential to have a always on network connection 24/7 if you turn it off we will delete all your data/j

  • TK420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    11 hours ago

    As all the cool kids keep saying, now is a great time to try out Linux.

    No, I’m not recommending a distro for you, that is what DuckDuckGo is for.

    • Astral08@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Can you run windows games on linux without it being resource intensive like using a vm or something?

      • Walk_blesseD
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Most of the time, yeah. Check ProtonDB for the particulars regarding any particular game. Games with intrusive DRM or anticheat probably won’t work though.

      • Imacat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Gaming in Linux on a windows VM isn’t viable for most systems. Most games run really well through proton with little to no effort. Some even run better on Linux than on windows. You just can’t play a lot of the most popular competitive online games because it flags their anti cheat.

      • iorale@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If you are lucky, things run with minimal tinkering or out of the box.
        If you are me… You won’t be able to play using virtual lans (zerotier one, xlink kai) and some games that should work out of the box just won’t start.
        That’s literally the only reasons I haven’t switched OS.

        • doctortran@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It definitely depends on the game and the particulars of your own system.

          The answer to the question is a resounding “you’ll have to try it for yourself”. It could be flawless, it could be a nightmare, there’s a lot of variables.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Actually to find a good distro and instructions on how to install them i recommend using an ai chatbot.

      Majority of people have never created a bootable media but its easy enough ai can guide them step by step.

        • Mwa@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          I love how they make people choose their distro rather then “ubuntu or bust” they still used ubuntu for their guide but yk it doesn’t matter that much

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Eh, just look up a reputable YouTube channel and guide. Chatbots can randomly make dumb mistakes that a total newbie won’t recognize, potentially causing them a lot of headache.

        And no, I’m not one of those diehard anti-AI people. My work has its own custom GPT model and I utilize it almost daily for menial tasks. But even having it generate script boilerplate and whatnot, I sometimes notice it writing stuff that won’t work and/or does it in a really verbose/weird way.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          You cant ask a youtube channel what distro best suit your specific usecase.

          Also realistically no one wants to sit trough a video to check out a strangers recommendation for linux.

          I do get that people are worried about the incompetence of AI but this topic and procedure is so bog standard i have more faith in chatgpt doing it then a human.

          If you dont believe me, try it.

          Ask chatgpt/claude/gemini “How to make a bootable linux media from windows” you will have to spend a long time trying before you find it fails on something this boilerplate.

          • bassomitron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            You don’t need to ask, as there are tons of well made videos giving great breakdowns of the most popular distros and the pros/cons of each while also showing demonstrations of a user session within them. To me, that’s far more informative than a broad, generalized typed paragraph. However, I will concede that I’m more a visual, hands-on learner, so this is subjective.

            And I agree, creating a boot disk is very simple and straightforward. The likelihood of GPT/Gemini getting it wrong is low. Especially Gemini/Copilot, as they basically just regurgitate the top tech site articles in this context and will cite the links it used (e.g. stack exchange, Tom’s hardware, etc). But like I said above, it can still happen, so why not just look up the source material for something so simple? I doubt any time is really saved by using AI in this instance. Not to mention, if you’re more of a visual person, it’s nice to see someone else give a demonstration.

            To each their own, though. Neither method is necessarily the wrong/better one.

            • candybrie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              It’s crazy how different people are. The idea of sitting through a video to do something like this is so painful to me. Like I find it useful for physical things where seeing the motion can be helpful, but I still generally find doing things that way awful. Please, please, please just give me written instructions for things. Especially if I’m going to need to refer back to it a few times (e.g. there are multiple steps that take a bit of time).

              • bassomitron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                It depends on the context for me. Repairing/replacing something on like my lawnmower or car? Video all the way. A simple CLI command/process? A quick write-up is often preferred for me.

                • Zorsith
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  You quickly can skim text for relevance to your needs/situation, hard to do that with a video.

      • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Do chatbots provide accurate and safe instructions for all steps? Or will it mix different instructions for different scenarios?

      • Mwa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Ai is not that good unless it’s like hugginchat where it scraps sites for info and stuff

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I still for the life of me can’t figure out what’s so great about secure boot and tpm. All it’s ever done for me is prevent me from booting a legitimate OS, or a bootable flash drive with iso images on it (like ventoy). It’s also pretty good at giving me a headache trying to figure out how the keys work and how to register them.

    I just turn them both off and live in ignorant bliss.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Secure boot and TPM are tools for (among other things) making sure nobody (E.G. a virus or worm) has tampered with your OS and bootloader. You can for instance use both on Linux, it’s just by default they come preloaded with Microsofts configuration for loading Windows, and the technical knowledge for how to reconfigure it is a bit arcane.

      It’s an excellent security tool, it’s just abused by Microsoft to discourage competition.

    • ooterness@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s not for you, it’s for them. Secure boot means it only runs their operating system, not yours. Trusted enclave means it secures their DRM-ware from tampering by the user who owns the PC.

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Secure boot means that only the intended bootloader runs, it can be any one, but it just needs to be the intended one.

        Secure boot works with Linux.

        • ooterness@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It works for now on x86-64, yes. For now. As always, we are one “think of the children” crisis away from lobbyists taking that option away.

          • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            What? I think you maybe just don’t know what purpose secure boot serves.

            It’s not a tool to vendor lock computers, it’s a tool to establish a chain of trust to protect the boot process by only allowing cryptographically signed images from executing. Anyone can sign things for secure boot by simply creating an x509 certificate and importing it. If vendors wanted to prevent you from running a different operating system, they would just lock it down completely as is done in many devices like mobile phones and proprietary electronics.

      • ftbd@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        What do you mean? I remove all vendor keys and enroll my own secure boot keys. This way only my install with my bootloader signed by my keys will boot.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    9 hours ago

    My PC is getting old and I might replace it in about a year whenever I can get an OK GPU for a reasonable amount of money again.

    I’ve built my own PCs since the late 90’s and this will be the first time I will not install Windows on a computer I built. Get fucked Microsoft.

    • Lippy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I already did this 2 years ago and I still don’t miss Windows. I want my OS to just work, and that means not having big companies intentionally blocking updates and bullying consumers just so they can profit from artificially induced OEM license sales. It’s pretty wild how quickly Linux has fit the bill in recent years, and how Windows no longer does.

      Only hurdle on Linux right now is the transition from X11 to Wayland. Proton doesn’t have good support for it yet so I occasionally have to load an X11 session for some games to run. I can imagine that getting worked out eventually.

      Microsoft could have simply dropped official support for older machines and then literally done nothing and that would have still been better than what they did. At least then those machines would still receive security updates beyond next year, provided they could still run the latest version of Windows.

      For the record, if the arbitrary CPU block is bypassed, then it’s possible to install Windows 11 23H2 on a Prescott era Pentium 4 or Athlon 64. The true requirements did change for 24H2, but even then you can install that on a 1st gen Intel or a Bulldozer era AMD system. Microsoft can go suck a dick.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’ll also add the audio stack in Linux at the moment is a hot mess. I’m currently trying to resolve a problem that seems to exclusively plague the rear mic input on my system and nothing else and this shit is fucking obtuse. It’s ridiculous how many competing audio frameworks there currently are.

        • pmc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          There are only 2 current audio frameworks, right? PipeWire (most current, best compatibility from what I’ve seen) and PulseAudio (dominant for a long time but now being replaced by PipeWire)

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Sort of kind of. The actual drivers are still ALSA which both pulse and pipewire build on top of. Then there’s JACK which is older but basically tried to be Pipewire before Pipewire. Lastly there’s WirePlumber which is an automation/scripting thing built on top of Pipewire. So depending on what you’re doing you end up having to wrangle with a minimum of Pipewire and ALSA, and might also need to mess with WirePlumber and Pulse (as Pipewire exposes a Pulse API).

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Headline in another universe:

    “Microsoft aiming to push population into switching to Linux.”

      • Zorsith
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I feel like people concerned about the expense of a new computer aren’t generally going to look at Macs, but I’m not too familiar with their longevity/support; is it a good length of time?

  • dovah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Last week, I installed Debian on a 20 year old 32-bit IBM Thinkpad and it’s going strong.

    • EldritchFeminity
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Fixed it for you:

      Company renders 60%+ of computers running current software incapable of running new software due to niche hardware requirement, abruptly ends support for current version next year, and tells users to throw away their computers and buy new ones.

      Oh, and they’re promoting their cloud storage option. Which may or may not have anything to do with their data harvesting? I don’t really know on that one.

      • Zorsith
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        “Abrupt” and “current” are pretty generous for windows 10 tbh. This has been a known deadline for several years at this point, and windows 11 has been out since 2021.

        Absolutely fuck microsoft with a cactus, but this is hardly new or surprising at this point.

        • EldritchFeminity
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          By “abrupt,” I mean that Windows 7 ended service updates just last year, and Windows 10 will end next year. And by “current,” I mean that Windows 11 overtook 7 as the second most used version of Windows in 2022.

          We’ve known that they’re ending support for 10 next year for a few years, but that end of life timeline is very short compared to previous versions of Windows. If 10 had the same end of life timeline as 7, we’d be seeing service updates for 10 ending in 2030. And 11 may be the newest version of Windows, but it is by all means not the most used version and is most likely not the version currently being used by most people that this article is relevant to.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Atleast windows 10 still gets security updates for 1.3 years