PS.

I would for vote Kamala. I would vote for a cactus with sunglasses if it had the Democratic nomination. You would do yourself well to consider anything that is weaking the resolve of the anti-trump sentiment straight poison to your brain. We have only one job this novemeber and that is to stop trump. The Supreme Court has given him the status of king. Quit acting like your vote is sacred and start realizing your vote is your final cry before your rights are forfeited.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    4 months ago

    I am an unapologetic leftist, and, like most other leftists, I do not believe that engaging in the liberal democratic process will, or even can, bring about my ideal society. However, while I don’t think voting is likely to make things meaningfully better, I do think it can prevent things from getting meaningfully worse. Maybe fascism can’t be defeated with votes, but I can’t see how anything is lost by trying. I mean, why make it easier on the fascists? I’m sure the fascists won’t just give up because they lost an election, but that’s not a reason to hold the door open for them. Again, I don’t think voting for Biden (or whoever the Democratic candidate ends up being) is going to make things much better, but I do think not voting for him could make things much worse. So, we (leftists) should all vote for the Democrats this November. Not because it’s going to get us nearer to our ideal, or our ultimate goals, but because it might help prevent the US from being taken over by fascists.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      4 months ago

      Change requires sustained momentum. Bouncing back and forth between Republicans and protest voting against Democrats. Is a sure fire way to see no change. If we were to say, show solidarity and dedication to keep all Republicans from elected office. Republicans would lose relevance and slink away. They might try masquerading under a different name like economic liberals playing Libertarian that generally vote Republican. But they will lose influence.

      Once that happens. Then we focus on the worst of the Democrats, primarying every single one and driving them out. That sustained momentum and push is what’s needed. To keep the fascist and the wealthy scattered and disorganized like they’ve kept the left. Though the left has done a fair share of that to itself. The right will eat itself as well especially once they’re not winning.

      • Icalasari@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, basically if the Republicans can be crushed in an election or two - Not just defeated, but absolutely demolished - then it could lead to them dissolving, and lead to the Democrats splitting and pushing the Overton window back left

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’d still argue that’s a bit too short-term. It would have to last years. Not just elections. Probably 3 to 4 presidential elections at minimum. A good decade absence from from National political relevance will get the message across.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        How sustained are we talking? We ushered in the Biden presidency with a huge mandate in 2020, and snuffed out the alleged “red wave” in ‘22 due to republicans’ reprehensible views on denying women bodily autonomy.

        Biden and the establishment Dems have squandered this time by telling Americans who are suffering economically that the economy is doing great. That Biden is better than FDR, while our public infrastructure crumbles and our most popular social programs are at risk of closure.

        When should we expect the Democrats to actually do something meaningful that improves the vast majority of normal people’s lives?

        • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The Biden administration has been directly addressing that crumbling infrastructure with the largest federal infra investment in modern history. It just happens to be boring so the media doesn’t talk about it.

          • crusa187@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ok, so private contractors who are pals with Congress critters get massive checks from the taxpayers to maybe do something, but we won’t see any tangible improvements for at least a decade.

            What are they doing in particular? Shouldn’t Biden be making his case as part of his campaign for president? It seems that whenever he gets pressed for details, he just gets flippant and says he’s done more for the American people than FDR and we’re just too stupid to realize it. I’m just not seeing it. I do see a record amount of oil and gas drilling, asylum seekers still in cages while building more of Trump’s wall for him, massive arms sales to enrich military contractors and slaughter innocents in the middle east, and a seeming lack of interest in protecting voter rights and civil liberties. So to me, it seems nothing has changed with Biden from the neoliberal status quo over the last 25 years. Considering he’s over 80, that’s not a huge surprise. Is it the media’s job to advertise Biden’s accomplishments for him?

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        We don’t need to wait for the Republicans to stop existing before we get representation in exchange for our votes. With a more representative electoral system like Ranked Choice voting, people would be free to vote for those that best represents them, secure in the knowledge that their vote would still be counted even if their preference didn’t win. Still counted against the republicans.

        You see, we can have democracy and freedom at the same time. How we vote is controlled at the state level, so we should be able to make these changes in blue states where republicans have less influence.

        Unless of course, the democrats in power in those blue states aren’t interested in democracy.

        • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          So long as the republicans exist, the amendments necessary to get ranked choice voting wont happen. So yes actually, we do need to wait for them to stop existing

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        …the democratic party does not make electoral reform a priority. Are they ever going to address the problem of all these disenfranchised voters who don’t want to vote for them?

        Probably not.

        Democrats need to beg people they dont represent to vote for them to stop fascism. That’s the point of your entire comment right?

        Correct.

        Democrats can’t fight the republicans alone.

        Yes, that’s true.

      • MarciaLynnDorsett@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        how many times are you going to spam this? espescially that skewed youtube video that seems to be designed to push people toward strategic voting instead of voting for their values.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    4 months ago

    I always like to point out that the people on the far right are always going to vote, and they are always going to vote for the Republican candidate no matter what. Even if you feel like there aren’t any “good candidates” you should still vote because even getting a less than ideal president is better than just doing nothing and letting Trump become a dictator for life

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      The only real solve is for several people to devote their lives to seeming like milquetoast centre right Democrats, getting into a majority of high ranking committee positions, and then all turn left at once and effect sweeping reforms to the entire platforms

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It’s impossible. You would have to be able to fake “real housewives” type social discourse and be able to social climb in that environment. It guarantees only dumb, thoughtless, bite backing, people will ever hold seats of power. Else you risk GOP game of thrones style politics where the GOAT is a spray tanned ballsack with a golden comb over.

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          Exactly why I bothered to describe a comically implausible scenario for everyone’s enjoyment.

          I think I’m out of jokes for now, at least until we find out one of Trump’s kids has a mysterious illness that can only be treated by a tall drunk with a disquieting gaze.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        IMO, the solutionis changing how we vote so the disenfranchised are encouraged to participate. More voters equals more democratic votes. So why arent democrats taking these easy votes? All it takes is passing electoral reform in the states they control.

        • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Because that would lose more moderates than the leftists itd gain. The electorate is a third fascist, a third conservative, about a sixth leftist and a sixth social democrat

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m hoping Biden steps down and is replaced, but if he doesn’t, as concerning as that is to our chances, I will still be voting for the Dem ticket against literal fucking fascism and encouraging everyone I know IRL to do likewise.

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      Man, I’d love some real ranked choice voting right about now, but in the meantime, it’s Democrat down the line.

      We live in the real world, and anything other than that might as well be saying “please stomp all over my civil liberties harder daddy”

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s not about that. It’s about sleep walking into fascism. Before the debate it was metaphorical. If you keep voting for the lesser evil you still get evil. It just takes longer.

    Now we’re being asked to vote for someone who clearly cannot handle the duties of the office and is nothing more than a figurehead. Rubber stamping this does not protect democracy. It proves they can manufacture consent to put whoever they want in that office and you guys will keep pulling that lever thinking, “it could be worse”.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      and is nothing more than a figurehead

      Fine by me.

      Come November, I will not be voting for an old guy named Biden. I will be voting for the Biden administration, an administration that rejoined the Paris climate accords, has made progress wrt medical debt, has seen decreasing levels of uninsured Americans, and made progress on myriad other issues. Because the alternative is…well, you know.

      I am not voting for my ideal candidate, or my ideal administration, but that’s because 1) I’m not an accelerationist, and 2) I’m smart enough to know how this works given our deeply flawed voting system.

      I’m not sure you can really have it both ways — the only alternatives for someone who doesn’t want Trump but won’t vote for Biden that I see are accelerationism, or complete and utter naivety…which is functionally equivalent to accelerationism.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t agree that those are the only avenues left. Biden is vulnerable to a replacement campaign now. We can sidestep the entire thing. Get a good admin and a president strong enough to fight the inevitable reactionary shit from red states.

    • wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ok so let’s have Trump instead?

      No, thanks. Vote for Biden so that we don’t have to repeat the fallout of 2016.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Vote for anyone but Biden, Trump, and RFK.

        We aren’t too close to November to replace him.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m not even going to start with a list put together by his base. The news can’t put one together that doesn’t get ripped to shreds once you actually look at it. I doubt his base has put together anything like a list that says what the policies actually do. And no the title of the bill or the PR elevator pitch has no relation to what it actually does. For example he actually severely cut EV subsidies and you all fell on your knees to thank him for it.

        • DogWater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Literally your best argument against this NOT ALL OF THOSE ARE REAL BECAUSE HIS SUPPORTERS COMPILED IT SO IMMA VOTE FOR A FACIST RACIST

          You’re fucking wild bro

            • DogWater@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              If your not voting, voting 3rd party, or voting for Trump …any of those is a vote for Trump in America’s presidential election.

              Also your name is maggoty so…

              And let’s not get distracted from the main point by straw manning here. Your argument is ridiculous.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                No. No they aren’t. The only vote for Trump is an actual vote for Trump. Casting anyone who doesn’t support you as an other who must support the bad guy was bullshit when Bush did it and it’s bullshit now.

                • DogWater@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  No it isn’t. It’s literally math and logic deduction. It’s the bullshit two party system’s failings.

                  Because you only have 2 options who are going to pull enough votes to win, throwing your vote to a 3rd party is taking a vote from biden. not voting is taking a vote from biden. all of that is equal to a vote for Trump.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Give his base a little more credit than that. They aren’t dumb enough to list the inflation reduction act, they call it environmental legislation.

    • Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re right, and I’m getting real sick of the “shut up and fall in line” demand from democrats.

      In this current system, EVERY election now will always be “the most important one ever”, with fascism at the front door and our democracy being at stake.

      When the options are between (insert every terrible adjective that accurately describes him here) Trump, and ‘guy with obvious mental decline’ Biden, the blame doesn’t lie with the voter. If Joe Biden can’t earn people’s votes, the responsibility lies with Joe Biden and the Democrat establishment.

      There are millions of leftist voters in this country who are being ignored by the two parties, and the democrats are hostile toward them and don’t want to move left to gain their votes. The leftist voters then get villainized by dems for seeking out a third party that better aligns with their values. “How dare you not fall in line! A vote for a third party is a vote for Trump!” No, it’s not. It’s exercising what little democracy we have left. The only vote for trump is an actual vote for trump.

      The Democrat establishment simply doesn’t offer enough to anyone left of them. I don’t want the status quo; the status quo sucks. It’s a deregulated capitalist hellscape full of cruelty, slavery, wealth inequality, and planetary disaster.

      I wish the dems could step back and realize what they are advocating for. The best and only choice for president is currently an 81-year-old man dealing with cognitive decline?! No, that’s not okay! That is not acceptable!

    • bamboo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      The risk of doing nothing becomes the greatest risk of all. It absolutely could be worse, we all lived through 4 years of Trump (and the aftermath re:Supreme Court appointments). We don’t need hypotheticals here, there’s a clear comparison between 4 years of Trump and 4 years of Biden, and not voting out of principal doesn’t stop anything.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        In full transparency, I’m not voting for Biden in November because of the Palestinian Genocide and because I believe he’s already ineffective at protecting LGBTQ rights in red states. But I’m not here to tell you not to vote for him in November. I should have been more clear above. We have the momentum to replace him and vote for someone that isn’t just a figurehead. Biden and his allies are using the “vote blue no matter who” rhetoric as a club to stop people from talking about replacing him on the ticket. We can cross that bridge on August 23rd though, the day after the convention. Right now we need to fully and faithfully have the conversation about replacing him.

        After November we need to better organize to prevent the mega donor class from steering us into a full Oligarchy. Something that’s on the plate for both old guys.

        • bamboo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          I hate to break it to you but if it’s Biden & Trump in November, regarding Palestinian Genocide and LGBTQ rights, Trump will absolutely be worse than Biden, so not voting for Biden will not change anything and just make things worse.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            So this is an interesting issue. Either state’s rights are so strong that Blue States can protect LGBTQ people as hard as Red States have been persecuting them or Biden is willfully letting Red States persecute LGBTQ people.

            So no it’s not going to be worse. It’s going to be the same as it ever was in either case. And as for the Palestinians, my heart goes out to them but my vote isn’t about what happens on the ground there. It’s about the permissive morality of contributing to it. If we’re willing to contribute to it there, then we’re willing to contribute to it here. And you can see it shaping up in rhetoric against marginalized people by politicians from both parties. They disagree about LGBTQ people because that’s a flashy issue they can use. The second you’re talking about homeless people and immigrants the rhetoric converges.

            We just approved forcing homeless people into camps, destroying all of their property, and using them as forced labor if they resist. Immigrants aren’t far behind, we’re on to trying to deny them asylum because they showed on the wrong day and return them to the hands of cartels in Northern Mexico. Something that’s actually illegal according to our laws and international treaties we’ve signed. So now there’s a displaced person problem on our border and in history that translates to forced labor. If you have questions about that you should read up on refugee camps where western volunteer doctors learn not to ask too many questions. The dynamic works whether or not it’s officially declared a refugee camp.

            • bamboo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              I think all of these points really come down to the Supreme Court makeup, which got fucked under Trump. Trump was able to nominate 3 justices, which created the super majority we have now.

              So no it’s not going to be worse. It’s going to be the same as it ever was in either case.

              They have indicated that they want to undo previous decisions which codified gay rights. This isn’t a red state/blue state issue, it will affect the whole country.

              We just approved forcing homeless people into camps

              The same court made the decision about making homelessness illegal. The most direct way to stop these horrible decisions from being made will be to support the impeachment of the corrupt justices, and ensure that we have a president who will nominate justices who aren’t corrupt and taking away our rights.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Okay I need you to understand this. The Red States have been ignoring the old Supreme Court rulings. They do not care. and the Homeless laws I’m talking about were passed by Democrats, in contravention of old Supreme Court rulings.

                This is not a SCOTUS issue. They’re the scapegoat on these issues and the myth that there would be substantive change if we just kept Biden in office.

                Either States are powerful enough to ignore the federal government, or they aren’t. And the implications of that are not good for Biden either way. Because he’s either powerless, in which case so would Trump be, or he’s willfully allowing this, in which case the worst case scenario is already playing out.

                • bamboo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  The Red States have been ignoring the old Supreme Court rulings.

                  Citation needed. Regardless if states follow the rulings, the supreme court can shift the views of the nation. After 2015 same sex marriage ruling, there was much higher support for same sex marriage, with noticable large increases with Republicans corresponding to the Supreme Court ruling:

                  https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/06/26/support-for-same-sex-marriage-grows-even-among-groups-that-had-been-skeptical/

                  From the Article from 2017:

                  For the first time, a majority of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents do not oppose allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally.

                  To your other point:

                  myth that there would be substantive change if we just kept Biden in office.

                  When Biden assumed office, we were in the middle of a global pandemic, still social distancing because there were no vaccines, and we’re having a 9/11 worth of American deaths every day. Maybe returning to normal life wasn’t substantive for you, but there have been huge changes over the last 3.5 years of the Biden presidency.

                  Because he’s either powerless, in which case so would Trump be, or he’s willfully allowing this, in which case the worst case scenario is already playing out.

                  In this situation, do you think Trump would be willingly allowing atrocities or actively driving and enabling them? A Trump presidency would clearly be the worst case scenario here.

                  EDIT: just formatting

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yes, you can manufacture consent. That was obvious. What will you do about it? The question being asked isn’t, “how do we rebuild america.” It is what do we do in novemeber. Any thing else is purposeful obsfucation.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Short term, pressure for replacing Biden. November, vote if you can stomach it. Thereafter, get involved with your state party. March. If you’re in a red state then you have a unique position of running on more progressive things that are actually people oriented. That’s what led to Democrats taking state wide offices in Arizona. You aren’t beholden to the DNC’s mega donors.

        If you’re in a blue state plan to help primary an establishment Democrat.

        Don’t shirk away because you can’t do it yourself, that’s an unrealistic expectation. Organize your friends, your coworkers, your commuter bus, etc.

        Nothing in politics is “over” if you can get a critical mass of people to agree to change things. And it’s really the only way off this manufactured consent treadmill for corporate power and profits we’ve been on for the last 40 years.

        Edit to add- Confining the question to November is a logical fallacy. We aren’t that close to the election that we can do nothing but vote. So that’s pretty much just another attempt to get people to turn their brain off, vote, and then sit around waiting for the next thing their told to do. If we don’t “activate” and start acting independently of big money then we aren’t going to have a democracy come 2028, no matter which person is elected now. Biden is a vote for an Authoritarian Oligarchy. Which isn’t “Fascism” in a technical sense, but it’s not going to feel much different for you and me.

    • EnderWiggin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      nothing more than a figurehead.

      That figurehead happens to be surrounded by people who aren’t fascists and support policy that I mostly agree with, so I guess I’ll take my chances with them.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sure, if you agree with the policies of the Oligarchy then who am I to stop you?

        You’re already retired though right? Because if you aren’t then I wouldn’t plan on them allowing you to ever do so.

        • EnderWiggin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I guess if that’s what you think is the oligarchy, than I suppose I do. And no, I am not retired, but I would say I am fairly successful with decent savings and retirement set aside.

  • GladiusB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Biden does one thing wrong. And that is Gaza. There is a shit ton he has done right:

    Supreme Court reform

    Student loan debt relief

    Healthcare reform

    Renewable energy act

    Banking reform

    Agriculture subsidies to be ecological

    Helping local farms

    Weed restriction reclassification

    Tech privacy restrictions

    Making medicare more accessible

    Veteran affairs

    And quite a few more. Give credit where credit is due. He’s worked hard for us.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think it was yesterday he filed for term limits? As well as an ethics code? It’s still early. But it’s a step in the right direction.

          • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            He’s asking for congress to impose the ethics code. I believe the people on NPR politics called the democrats handling of the Supreme Court for the last 50 years political malpractice. Only makes sense they would chose the least impactful route to try to fix it, 50 years too late.

    • ZMoney@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sanctioning and providing material support for a genocide is not in the same category as any of these things.

      • enbyecho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sanctioning and providing material support for a genocide is not in the same category as any of these things.

        Why pick that and why pick that now, this time? Why not before? Why not other genocides? Is it because you look good in a keffiyeh?

          • enbyecho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            “Why do you care about the Gaza’s genocide” is telling on yourself

            Allow me to spell it out for you:

            “Why do you care about the genocide of Palestinians NOW vs the last several decades of Israel’s apartheid state? Why do you care about the genocide of Palestinians but not of trans people in America? Why do you care about the genocide of Palestinians but not of Ukrainians?”

            This shouldn’t be hard to figure out. People chose this issue now because they can afford to ignore the consequences of a Trump (or even just GOP) administration. They don’t have to deal with what happens and that fact allows them to prioritize one genocide over another.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s not just having elections. It’s having enough breathing room to enact fundamental change at all. We need to unionize every workplace, and start insisting that politicians of any party work for us. The path forward will be hard enough under Biden, but basically impossible under Trump. Voting is not sufficient by itself.

    • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Something INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT that no one talks about is how when real pressure is laid on the table, Biden almost always bends. Having him stay in office, while not the best possible scenario, is also not the worst IF we all continue to pressure him. Granted, it would have to be done in different and more nuanced ways as he is then again the sitting President. However, I feel with the right people at the forefront and the correct pressure, we can enact change through him more significant than anything he has done these last four years.

      And make no mistake my dear dissidents, he HAS done a lot of good.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If biden wins you get none of those things and another „last chance” election in 4 years. Nobody wants to fix anything anymore. There are only people who want to destroy what remains for even more power.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Every election is going to be a “last chance” election until there’s another GOP win. Then either they were right, the Dems will learn and pivot to another tactic or they’ll lose several more times because losing the last chance and still having another “last chance” right on schedule makes you look especially dishonest.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’ll do my duty and vote for Biden, but we’re going to lose with Biden.

    • 37% approval-rating matching Jimmy Carter; no candidate in history won with those numbers.
    • Biden has the most catastrophic debate performance in history, proving long-held fears by 75% of the electorate that Biden is too old 3 an immutable, worsening attribute.
    • Biden was already hemorrhaging black and hispanic voters.
    • Biden was already losing youth vote in part due to his position on Israel.
    • Trump’s polls hardly budge after a full-blown criminal conviction.
    • Trump seizes the narrative for the first time positively with a VP pick and TIME-cover magazine shots of him pumping his fist, defiant with a flag in the background as he’s covered in blood from an assassination attempt.
    • Trump campaign has barely spent a nickle of their war chest money while Biden has been dumping their cash just to stay afloat in the polls as damage-control post-debate.
    • Biden campaign team has ZERO strategy to change the trajectory of his terrible polls, including the 6 battleground states, all of which he trails in.

    Ultimately it’s not me you have to convince; it’s the low-info battleground state swing-voter who now is either not voting or leaning Trump once again.

    I will continue to advocate for Biden to step down until post-Convention; after that, well, I’ll probably bet money against his victory. That way, at least it’s win-win for me.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Go state by state and it gets a lot worse. He’s poised to lose Michigan in a state the Dem Governor is going to swing by ten points.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Right but now compare that to 2020 disparity between candidates while keeping in mind Biden only won by 40,000 votes in 3 battleground states.

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Doesn’t seem too far off. Maybe about 5-6% worse than july 2020.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            And additionally 10 points down nationally from where Biden was in h2h polling when comparing 538 polling aggregates.

            Whats worse between 2020 and 2024 is that Biden has had 3.5 years to prove himself, give the Americans a chance, and he still had terrible approval ratings. These numbers are likely baked in because the electorate is very familiar with both candidates.

            • vxx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Aren’t the 10% pretty moot, since it’s a two party system?

              Wait two weeks and we can talk again, because we’re now at the time frame the trend for the final run will be set.

              BTW, I have tagged you as “Both Sides Don’t vote” for a while now.

              • lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                I think it matters because Democrats must outperform Republicans nationally in popular vote in order to have any chance at an Electoral College victory. On the eve of 2020 election, Biden was up 8% over Trump, won by 7 million votes, and yet ultimately only won by 40,000 critical votes in 3 battleground states largely decided by low-info swing voters who once voted for Obama, then Trump, and then Biden again. Thus, if he’s now down 3-6 points and not up 8 pts, that portends a sweeping Electoral defeat.

                I guess we shall see for better or worse.

                And honestly, what does that tag mean? I’ve never promoted BotH sIDeS and I’ve never advocated for anyone to not vote or vote 3rd party. Cite me otherwise. Good luck. Because I think you may be missing the nuance and forging a strawman out of my position.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Even if he didn’t, which it certainly won’t hurt him, Biden is already underperforming not just his 2020 run by a full 10 points, he’s doing worse than Hillary’s 2016 run. I’m glad Trump chose Vance as it doesn’t help him, but again it doesn’t change the bottom-line.

        We need to jump ship while there is still time.

        Adam Schiff now just publicly called for for Biden to step down.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Indeed, we’d have no other better choice. It just puts me back where I was pre-Debate, but with less hope.

            • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 months ago

              God I wish that debate never happened, I wasn’t even slightly worried about Biden’s chances until that made me go “Oh shit…”

              People I know irl have actually switched to Trump because they’re worried Biden is a danger to himself and those around him. They keep saying “Oh Project 2025 will never pass, we got checks and balances”, but that’s not really true anymore

              • fadingembers
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                Project 2025 is already well under way. The supreme court has seen to that

              • lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’ll be honest… I was still worried, and I think the Biden camp was, too. I just fell in line and tried to do my part in highlighting the obvious contrast between a fascist old guy and just an old guy who means well. It’s why they took the debate in the first place because Biden’s numbers have been on a steadily downward slope even without major Republican spending.

                I’ve heard similar, in a critical battleground state no less from the likes of my one uncle. Obama->Trump->Biden->Undecided/Leaning-Trump. :))

                • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  How the fuck can you go from Obama to Trump? Isn’t that like getting out of a Spike Lee joint and going “Can’t wait to tell the fellas at the Klan meeting about this awesome picture!”

                  Stress Project 2025, and show them THIS - https://vxtwitter.com/JDVance1/status/1511311385543815180 This ad was the moment I knew that Vance was a disgusting human being who needs to be nowhere near the White House.

                  I can’t believe they actually aired an ad that asks if I hate Mexicans with “Yes” being the answer the ad was not only expecting, but actively hoping for

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    The choice is between boring corporatists and 100% concentrated evil. Undecided voters are the dumbest people on the face of the Earth.

  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    The problem with this meme is that it’s written by a shelter middle class white person. Minorities and poor people HAVE been dying due to Democrats’ capitation and appeasement to Republicans for years now.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re right, minorities and poor people have suffered and some died while Democrats were ostensibly in charge. What do you propose an American does on election day?

      Barring a cataclysmic reordering of American politics, it’s still true that voting for anyone but the Democratic candidate will increase the odds of Trump winning. Trump is a blatant liar, corrupt, rapist, and racist. He’s promised to enact revenge on those he perceives as his enemies, and his proposed policies will cause suffering an order of magnitude more than what is already unjustly inflicted on minorities and the poor.

      It sucks. We should have good candidates to choose from. We should have ranked choice voting and a multi-party system, but we don’t.

      It’s inflicting harm on yourself and many others to do anything other than vote Democrat in November. There’s more we can do than vote, but that’s a bare minimum.

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That’s extremely simplistic. The complicated truth is:

      1. It’s a law of political science (Duverger’s specifically) that a first-past-the-post system leads large, mass-appeal parties, and parties that don’t go for mass appeal will fail.
      2. In the US, the political balance is further pushed to the right by a) unequal representation that typically favors rural states and districts, most egregiously in the Senate, and b) denial of representation to particularly blue parts of the country like PR and DC. This means that relative to the country, Democrats cannot be as far left as Republicans are far right and still hold power. This can be observed in the simple fact that in the 21st century, Democrats have won 5/6 national popular votes, but have only controlled the Senate in 4/12 sessions.
      3. From 1 and 2, it follows that Democrats would effectively lose what little political power they have by taking a firm leftist stance, leading to effectively a one-party far right state.
          • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nah, plenty of people besides her say this. You’d know this if you ever actually listened to the minorities you demand blindly vote for you.

              • drislands@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 months ago

                I took a look at their profile. Best as I can tell they’re either a tankie or one of those “both sides” kids. You know the type. Not worth engaging with, IMO.

                • YeetPics@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I feel like both groups fall under the idiotic umbrella of Republican.

                  Idk what tankies have to say about it, they’re cut from the same cloth as the maga chuds.

  • doylio@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    The person who wants Biden to be the nominee the most is Trump. Notice he’s gone completely quiet on him, not blasting him for his age like some democrats are, because he knows he can win against an 81yo Biden. As soon as he’s confirmed as the nominee, Team Trump will turn around and try to make him look as old as dirt

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Even if Trump is defeated. Trumpism isn’t over and we ill be in a endless loop of corporatists Dems will leave us in this same situation. This is the fork in the road for Dems to actually change and voters to demand better. Time is ticking, they have to figure out the best path forward.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Exactly, it is going to be awful if Trump wins but the social contract has been so thoroughly broken by austerity politics and democrats who campaign on how shitty republicans are (they are) and then don’t do shit when they get into power that I don’t think there is anything to save really if Biden refuses to step down and looses the election. The collapse was inevitable in the US, the Democratic Party would have kept only allowing older and more conservative politicians to effectively access the nomination until this very thing happened and the rest of the centrist Democratic Party would be too concerned with careerism to be the one to pull the fire alarm before it was too late.

      I hate to say it, but I don’t see the point in voting for Biden if he refuses to budge on fucking virtually anything, we are going down with the ship and the sooner the Democratic Party collapses in a heap the sooner we can actually build something productive here.

      A lot of people are going to suffer, but it isn’t the voters who aren’t convinced by Biden’s fault, it is the democratic parties fault for not giving us any choice but Biden type politicians and then expecting us to keep dealing with it indefinitely. Whenever progressives start to bring up concerns centrists just scream in our faces “NOW IS NOT THE TIME YOU ARE SO SELFISH” and guess what now it is wayyyyy to late for progressives to have any control or ability to save this, centrist democrats let republicans send this country off a cliff because they were too busy shaming progressives for yelling about how we were about to drive off a cliff.

      We are off the cliff, sorry to all the Biden fans and centrists that have always treated me condescendingly like my views were unrealistic or naive, but y’all never listened to us and treated us like children and now we are locked into this ride. It’s your fault, not mine.

      • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I feel like voters have gone above and beyond to get Biden to win the first time. If he really delivered or at least instilled enough confidence for people this wouldn’t be as hard. Not being Trump becomes less effective overtime when people become numb to his actions.
        I can only hope things turn out decently or everyone supports each other if the bad ending happens. Everyone gets shouted down until some type of exposing moment happens like that Debate. Even Trump voters actually vote for what they believe in, even if it is lies.

        • pachrist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          The problem is that Biden and Democrats won handily in 2020 by promising a path forward, but here we are 4 years later with not much path forward, just more treading water. Democrats didn’t groom or build up any new candidates, they didn’t make pushes in local government or the judiciary or any significant reforms. They’ve pushed a handful of executive actions that have been blocked and compromised badly with Republicans on so much else.

          The current Democratic leadership is trying to get walked to first, but we need them to swing for the fence.

        • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Much of that is the fault of the media having an insane and obvious bias towards Trump as well as the Biden team not shouting about what they’ve done constantly. It’s been a historically successful presidency but nobody has any fucking idea because they’re not doing anything to make sure people know about it.

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Trumpism is over as soon as Trump stops running for office. No one else can hold his torch. Ramaswamy and others try but they suffer from a terminal syndrome called maturity that Trump can never have. As immature as Ramaswamy pretends to be he is still a mature adult underneath it all and is incapable of behaving like Trump.

      There are no educated public figures, that are supposed to be taken seriously, as immature as Trump in the entire United States. He is on a level of underdevelopment all in his own.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    What really annoys me about all these political meme/card posts is the lack of spell checking.

    They’re right, but dammit, at least try to make your point look good. That would be the ideal.

  • Emmy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    Until the next one. The republicans are a looming existential threat that senior democrats do not take seriously, nor do they know how to fight.

    I hope we all remember the senior democrat leadership closing ranks to keep meaningful change (sanders) out during the last primary.

    Joe’s got to go.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I agree with your assessment of the problem but not necessarily your proposed solution. The problem is senior Democratic leadership, including members of Congress and powerful hidden figures in the DNC. Those are the people we definitely want to get rid of as soon as we reasonably can.

    • Myxomatosis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      My vote will be against Trump the Pedophile, no matter who it is, but I am beyond done with the dems. I agree that Joe needs to pass the torch to someone younger.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not the one who put in Biden you dip shit. I primaried against him in 2020, was vocally against him in 2021, 2022, and 2023.

      You fucking wish that a biden win is impossible. You are the trumper and the fascist and everything that goes with it because effectively, everything you do is for him.

      • SpaceBishop@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        “Blue MAGAs” “It’s over. You lost”

        This troll has no intention of having a meaningful discussion. He lives in a bizarre reality where voting against a rapist, dictator, and felon is the same as going full cock in hand for an authoritarian. Block him and move on.

        “Blue MAGA” What fucking fascist circlejerk birthed that nonsense?

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          The term has been around for just over a year.

          AKA Blue Fash/ Blue MAGA/ BNMW (But actually only Biden).

          It started as a descriptor for those defending Biden running again (when it was a literal campaign promise that he would stick to one term). Got more traction when the DNC cancelled/ disallowed any debates that would have put Biden on stage and have him challenged from within the party. The DNC pushed for a coronation and fed the line that anyone challenging this was “for Trump” through their various mainstream and alternative outlets.

          Dummies ate it up, and post October, say, November, when it was clear that Biden was taking the wrong side of the Gaza/ Israel issue and he started to see challenges to his policies from within the party, thats when the Blue MAGA rhetoric really got going. Its rhetorically very similar to what we saw coming from r/TheDonald in the earliest days of the MAGA movement. No space for nuance, gaslit trolling, vote-shaming, etc.

          When we saw a write in campaign for Undecided, that should have been the “SLAM ON BREAKS/ PULL HANDLE TO STOP” moment for Joe Biden, but Blue MAGA, in both mainstream and social media, worked to prevent a serious discussion around Joe Biden until very recently, when it became so appealingly glaring that he couldn’t win, even their abuse wasn’t enough to halt the conversation.

          • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            No no no, people were shutting down anti-joe sentiment since the 2020 election. It’s not blue MAGA it’s corporate control. Reddit was being commercialized and anything left of Joe was bad for business. Lemmy is a silo so when people transitioned after the mod strike they were finally allowed to say the fucking truth. Unfortunately the tankies and right wing ideologues got here first because they were driven from reddit long before the leftists.

            Most people were fine with the fact we had to throw down for joe again but because of obvious discourse bad actors have been amplifying in-fighting just about the time when there was nothing left anyone could do. They did the same thing with Bernie in 2016 and guess what, it’s working again.

            This whole sub is a testament to it. April, May, June, none of my memes would have gotten traction.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I think this (if a bit dated) macro highlights the definition fairly well:

              The know your meme article is worth a read. We’re both wrong on dates. It was coined in 2017. Obviously its usage has transformed several times, and I think my defintiion is probably the most accurate current working definition, specifically for the period from post WI/ MI/ MN primaries to now. Its the definition Jon Stewart used recently.

              Another example is MSNBC host Joy Reid saying she would vote for Joe Biden if he was in a coma. Or Whoopi saying she would vote for Joe Biden even if he was shitting his pants on stage.

              And this is the whole rhetorical point. It doesn’t matter that these Blue MAGA have incredibly low standards or are only interested this one guy. Saying you want insist on running the comatose pants shitter is not convincing to others and its losing Democrats the elections, entirely. Hence the actual panic in the Democratic party at this point, because Joe Biden’s down ballot impacts are that you give team red a super majority in BOTH the house and the senate.

              If you actually care about winning the election, its not about you being convinced of something; its about what is going take to convince a majority of people other than you of something.

              Most people were fine with the fact we had to throw down for joe again

              See. This is just not TRUE. Its not supported by the data. Look at the previous 450 days of polling. Look at the write in campaigns when the DNC shut-down anything resembling a real primary. You have to come to terms with the actual material fact that no, most Democrats right now do not want Joe Biden as candidate. This intentional ignoring of the facts is what qualifies as Blue MAGA behaviror.

              • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Polling data is notoriously shit. Joe won the primaries in 2020 and a better candidate has not emerged since. 2020 showed us that both candidates were not popular. Ever.

                In fact, Joe gets less credit then he deserves because he has done phenomenal for being a fucking useless dinosaur.

                Blue MAGA is thought terminating terminology and I will never submit to your fucking bullshit. I didn’t when you were screaming “alt-left” and I won’t wen you start saying blue-fash. You want the fucking “both sides” argument so hard and it’s absolute shit.

                Edit:

                Also love the fact that “only political DNC insiders votes should count” is in your meme and that’s exactly what you want to happen at the convention.

                • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Blue MAGA

                  If you’ve lost your connection to reality, and it seems like you have, I don’t know what other term to use for you. And its accurate in the sense that Red MAGA and now, you, with Blue MAGA, are in a cult that has completely detached its self from reality. The only thing guiding your rhetoric is your fear and your feelings. You have nothing to back up your argument for supporting Biden. When confronted with reality, you dismiss it.

                  Its sad to see whats happened to supposed “leftists”.

                  You are a walking definition of Blue MAGA.

          • YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            And like clockwork, here you are.

            How does it feel to be on the losing side of history AGAIN?!

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            It started as a descriptor for those defending Biden running again (when it was a literal campaign promise that he would stick to one term).

            It literally wasn’t a campaign promise. I know all you ever do is misrepresent things. But for Christ’s sake at least put basic effort into making it hard to fact check your lies when you troll. “Aids signaling he might be a one term president” doesn’t constitute a campaign promise.

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                What this axios? From the literal link you just posted?

                **The big picture: **Biden never made an explicit public promise to serve just one term — though Politico reported that he had privately told advisers that he wouldn’t run again.

                • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  The bottom line: Biden’s 2020 promises might not matter much to voters in the grand scheme of things, according to Fowler. “If the voters believed that Joe Biden was the best person for the job, and they were excited to vote for him, they would still be happy to vote for him regardless of whether he had said in 2020 that he was likely to be a one-term president or was just going to be a short-term bridge,” he said. “Unfortunately, there aren’t a lot of voters who are enthusiastic about voting for Biden right now.”

                  It was a campaign promise dude. It was in his rhetoric. He said it several times. Was it litterally in his platform? Did he sign a contract? No but thats never how campaign promises work.

                  You are being obtuse if you think that’s how campaign promises are made.

      • MrTomS@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        “I don’t know why you get up in the morning, you’re just gonna die eventually anyway”

        • bad_news (probably)

        Easier just to block some folks.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        lol you say you were against Biden until 2023? And now you’re this? Congratulations, you stand for absolutely nothing.

        I hope Biden wins. And then I want him to go to The Hague. Y’all gotta quit pretending that Biden is the only thing saving your country from fascism. It’s an embarrassment.

        • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          You’re the embarrassment. Ushering in fascism and pretending you’re better than anyone. People dead in the streets you’ll sit at home drinking your own piss thinking, “I sure told that guy online once.”

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                No one polling at his levels has won a Federal office, ever. Not once.

                Biden can’t win. Its just what it is. He’s too unpopular with his own party, with likely Democrat voters, with Independents. And that was the case before his disastrous debate performance (and the extended disaster encoure he’s offered post-debate). Its just plain, boring as cake fact that this particular candidate is losing the election, severely. Its pretty well established that due to a variety of factors, we need to see a Democrat polling at 8-+ their competition nationally to be break even on election day, and ideally 12+ to be comfortable. Biden was up on Trump 8 going into election day, and barely squeaked by. 40k votes in like 3 counties in swing states made the entire difference. That victory was so tight it made our buttholes squeak.

                You can’t stop fascism/ Trump/ Project 2025 with Biden as the candidate. The campaigns that are doing internal polling see that. And its not new new’s. Biden hasn’t been winning this race at any point in his campaign.

                You have to make a choice: You can either make your commitment to stopping fascism and Trump and project 2025, or your commitment can be to Joe Biden.

                You can’t have it both ways because the data is the clearest its literally ever been in American electoral politics: Joe Biden is going to lose this. It doesn’t matter if we have to figure out at the convention. It doesn’t matter if they want the delegates to decide or want to do another coronation. What matters is that if you refuse to get on the side of replacing Biden, you are conceding this election to DJT and come what may.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yep, democrats will do anything but appeal to the voters they actually need. Hillary didn’t campaign in Michigan and spent a fortune in campaign money in Texas, but they’re still blaming her loss on Jill Stein (as if people that would rather vote third party in a swing state would switch to the democrats if only you yelled at them enough).

      Biden lost critical swing state Muslims, a swathe of Gen Z and there’s probably a bunch of independents that do care about the age issue and also don’t see the “great economy” Biden keeps talking about.

      • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Idk how to tell you this. They dont need ledtists nearly as much as they need Obama-Ttump-Biden suburbanites in Wisconsin. Even jf you got a replacement candidate, they’d just be a moderate. Because an actual leftist is probably the only thing that would lose even harder

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      100% is not going to be yelled at into voting for Biden.

      But if you just shame them harder, or maybe tell them Democracy is even MORE on the line than ever ever, pinky promise (sorry we played this card then we didn’t even bother to prosecute the guy who put democracy on the line right before the election and whoopsie it went all fucky wucky and the clock ran out).

      There is a culture of trolling and abuse that has been allowed to foment on lemmy where the only acceptable view is effectively a form of diet-facism that comes from within the culture around the DNC, where questioning the decisions and strategies of people who are objectively bad at winning elections is simply disallowed.

      This thing’s over with Biden as candidate, and BNMW earned the L.

      • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They didnt not prosecute him, sycophantic courts managed to delay until this point, and then scotus granted him immunity. That outcome should’ve been obvious when an impeachment couldnt even get through