For me it’s the notification light you used to find on older phones, was particularly good to know if your phone was charged without picking it up

          • bjorney@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            The law just means it needs to be replaceable with at most basic tools or specialized tools supplied with the device.

          • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            42
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s the difference between sitting down for 20 minutes unscrewing various components to get to the damaged battery you need to replace, vs. popping off the back cover and simply swapping out one dead battery for a charged one anytime you run out of power. The former is replaceable. The latter is swappable.

            • eric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              This. Like ten years ago, when Samsungs had swappable batteries, they were super proud of it. They would advertise it as a feature that Apple doesn’t have.

              When I was at a festival, Samsung had an activation where you could tweet at them with your phone model and location and they would send someone with a full battery to trade you for yours. It was an amazing free service that I used so many times, and every time, the jealousy on the faces of all the iPhone people was palpable. Then one year, they quietly removed the swappability from their new phones.

              Swappable batteries are such a huge feature that most people don’t even know that they want.

      • Perfide@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nope, that EU legislation only requires batteries be replaceable, not swappable. In other words, you probably won’t need a heat gun to replace it, but you’ll probably still need a screwdriver.

      • zilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        11 months ago

        Was about to mentioned it. I have the Fp5 and the only thing that i miss is the headphonejack. Everything else is there:

        • battery which can be just swapped
        • expendable storage
        • easy to repair
        • the parts are also reasonably priced
      • ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Sure, but the Fairphone 5 is €700 and, ease of repair aside, you can get a better phone for less than half the price. Repairability doesn’t mean much when buying a cheaper (and otherwise better) phone and fully replacing it ends up being, well, cheaper.

        • zilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          I get your point. But it’s also about support for the phone and the fair production. I know they are not perfect, but someone needs to start somewhere. I needed a new phone anyway and invested in this one.

    • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I see this get talked about a lot.

      Almost all my inside phone batteries I’ve had in cheaper knockoff phones have been replaceable. It’s not as easy as pulling the back cover off and instantly swapping it, but it’s not THAT much harder. It’s doesn’t exactly require microsoldering. Which is the reason why I know my last three have been replaceable despite being in-house.

      Manufacturers really just need to make better and more secure charge ports. Having to resolder my last two blu phones and a Samsung because the charge ports go bad is just annoying.

      Never had issues with a battery in all my years of using smartphones though.

  • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    223
    ·
    11 months ago

    Absolutely the damn LED. I would love to trade the stupid never-being-used selfie-cam for a damn 5 cent LED.

    And swappable batteries. And a headphone-jack. And root by default (imagine you winpc came with no admin-pwd. Lol)… And…

    • Sasha
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      11 months ago

      I used to love customising the notification colour on my old phones, so good.

      I miss my headphone jack so damn much, I’m over Bluetooth earbuds breaking constantly and being so damn expensive and low quality.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 months ago

        Then buy phones with headphone jacks. Mine has one, I dont buy ones without it.

        If it matters for you to have it, dont buy phones that cut it. If models with it keep selling, theyre less likely to ditch it.

        • Sasha
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’d rather just buy a DAP than randomly replace a perfectly good phone with one that sucks in comparison.

            • Sasha
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              It was a perfectly good MacDonald’s, thank you very much!

              But in all seriousness, I just have particular needs that literally can’t be met by anything else.

          • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            And that why you’ll never get it back. You’re clinging to brand loyalty and hung up on arbitrary crap rather than just trying competing phones. Have you actually used any of those “suck” phones, or are you just going with the usual iPhone/high end android circlejerk?

            • Sasha
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              You have assumed completely wrong, friend.

              As I mentioned in another comment, if you’d bothered to read it, I have particular needs that mean I can’t really replace my phone with something else right now. I have absolutely no loyalty to brands, and I’m not clinging to something arbitrary.

      • corus_kt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        I used to have a similar problem - even if well reviewed, budget and midrange bluetooth earbuds would not last while budget-midrange wired earphones would last forever.

        Think it’s just build quality for bluetooth buds. I got a set of Galaxy buds, 1st gen, roughly 3+ years and still running strong to this day. Was not cheap though.

        • Sasha
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve been through two pairs of Sennheiser’s wireless buds, and I’m just over it.

          The only thing that might bring me back is the ANC, but even then I get significantly better ANC from my over ears, so probably not.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        U could try a usb to jack converter. Looks stupid but at least there’s a jack. Quality sucks anyway as they all use cheap dacs now 😩

        • Sasha
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve got a suprisingly good pair of USB C earbuds that I found in my mailbox at the moment, but yeah at some point I’ll probably get a DAC

        • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          usb to jack converter

          All Most of the ones you can get nowadays actually have a sound chip inside the cable (in the flat part behind the USB-C). So they’re pretty much a USB-C soundcard with just a headphone out. So it’s worth shopping around to find one that has a good soundcard built in.

          A good alternative is getting a decent portable Bluetooth audio receiver to plug your regular headphones into. Can get a better headphone amp that way.

          • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            There are phones that output analog audio over type C so you can have a type c to jack adapter with no dac inside, just wires. That is possible through Audio Adapter Accessory Alternate Mode.

            My huawei tablet works with such an adapter, but when I try it with the samsung s10e which has a jack, it gives an error and doesn’t work.

            Type C alternate modes are cool, too bad they are not advertised, they should be clearly labled and easily distinguishable. Type C has so many features yet it’s so hard to know what’s available without actually having the devices and connecting them. It’s both a blessing and a curse.

            • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Thanks for the correction. I had thought that only some of the early Motorolas had that feature, but it looks like there are quite a few more phones that support analog audio out via USB-C.

              From the wiki article:

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB-C#Alternate_modes

              Moto Z/Z Force, Moto Z2/Z2 Force/Z2 Play, Moto Z3/Z3 Play

              Sony Xperia XZ2

              Huawei Mate 10 Pro, Huawei P20/P20 Pro, Honor Magic2, LeEco

              Xiaomi phones

              OnePlus 6T, OnePlus 7/7 Pro/7T/7T Pro

              Oppo Find X/Oppo R17/R17 Pro

              ZTE Nubia Z17/Z18

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      11 months ago

      What I don’t understand is why the notification LED was removed in the first place? It can easily be put under the screen.
      The LED was so helpful, and it’s so annoying when I don’t see an important message for hours, because I haven’t used my phone.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’m guessing… they don’t want us deciding whether to engage with our phones, they want us looking at them more. If that means less convenience for us we can get fucked

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think you may have a point, It’s kind of weird how the first 10 years of smartphones, was an ever higher climb for better phones, driven by competition.
          But now that everybody are dependent on the phones, they all agree on taking useful features away???

        • cjsolx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Fuck. You’re probably right. It’s all about nudging us towards the behavior they want.

        • ___@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s probably also a little safer with only system apis accessing system hardware. If you look at how the camera assembly is one piece and apps basically access the whole thing securely.

      • RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        11 months ago

        I used to have a custom ROM that would allow me to change the color based on which app had the most recent notification: FB was Blue, SMS was Green. Let me be prepared ahead of time if it was going to be important or not.

        • sawdustprophet@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          11 months ago

          I used to have a custom ROM that would allow me to change the color based on which app had the most recent notification

          Even more than that, in early versions of Android this setting was baked in. I had colors set based on text messages, emails, etc. I think around 2.x was when the option was removed.

            • AliasVortex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I don’t know about the original, but I rocked a Droid 4 for the longest time. It’s probably my all time favorite phone. I really miss how quickly I could type and the extra screen space I got from not needing the software keyboard.

      • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Nowadays most phones have OLED screens, which can easily replicate the function of the notification LED with the “always on” feature.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yet there are often warnings that even with OLED AOD eats a lot of battery, not so with a notification LED.
          The absolute newest OLED that can do 1Hz refresh are better. But that doesn’t change that the removal of the notification LED was detrimental to the functionality of the smartphone.

          • Perfide@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            OLED AoD eats a lot of battery because there’s still quite a lot of information(and thus, pixels turned on) shown on the AoD. A single pixel blinking on and off would at most use the same power as a dedicated notification led.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Someone else posted an app that gives the feature back. If you turn off other aid features and just use the app it won’t use more battery than a notification led.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              If you turn off other aid features

              What?

              it won’t use more battery than a notification led.

              If the screen has 60hz or higher refresh, I’m pretty sure it will. The screen itself may not use much, but the DAC will still use power.
              I haven’t seen this actually tested, but many claim the difference in battery life is noticeable. I don’t think it matters much what app you use, many phones come with an AOD app, and I seriously doubt a third party app is better.

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                aid what?

                Typo: aod feature. Always on display.

                If the screen has 60hz or higher refresh, I’m pretty sure it will.

                It’s supposed to drop down to 1hz. The CPU refreshing a pixel of an OLED screen or a notification led is the same power usage. That is even if you have a notification led, the CPU could still be stuck refreshing it at 60 hz.

                • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  AH ok that makes a lot more sense. ;) As I understand it, it’s only the newest top displays that can go down to 1 Hz. Or maybe it’s just when in use they can’t for some reason. I find the 1Hz capability to be extremely cool, so it would be great if it’s a more general feature of AOD.

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I really can’t. I did it all. It just doesn’t come near the tiny lil LED shining bright.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m pretty sure mine has a tiny LED under the screen, that only shows very shortly on reboot. But as you say, it’s disabled for some weird reason.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Because if you can read an LED notification system you have no purpose to pick up the cellphone.

        Cellphones are not designed FOR YOU. They are designed by marketeers for you to use.

        Once you realize this, all the anti-consumer shit makes sense.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I have no effing clue. Maybe to get us to actually look at the damn phone more often? Because of the people who’re drowning in spam? Makes not THAT much sense. Probably to save a cent in circuit-design, because only the nerds were using the stupid LED? I really would like to know too.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I had an XCover 4 and hated the specs and the Samsung aspect. Too much bloat for my tastes.

        I’m glad there are others still buying these phones though, and the “Pro” makes it sound like it has modern specs!

        • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s very much a mid-range device but so was the price. It was still an easy decision since it is literally the only modern smartphone in existence that matched my minimum requirements. I’m coming from LG V20 so I still had to let go of FM-radio, optical image stabilization, IR blaster and the hi-fi DAC.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        But probably no easy root? That is imperative for me. I don’t buy gadget i wouldn’t own.

      • gregoryw3@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not sure but you can have the back camera led flash when you get a notification at least.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Of course not by default, that’d be dumb. Every app that wants it pops up a Y/N-dialogue. That’s how I want it. It’s my phone, goddamit. I might’ve phrased that a bit misleading :-)

    • nomad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      There are often enterprise versions that still have it. Like the S10E for example.

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          11 months ago

          Forgot my bluetooth headphones the other day on a long trip and the 3.5mm jack saved my rear end.

          Just needed to stop at a shop briefly for some cheap plug-in buds and I was no longer listening to babies screaming on the journey. As a bonus, it also didn’t interfere with me charging my phone

          • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’d like bluetooth earbuds a lot more if I could find some that aren’t “smart.” If I put on a beanie, I bump them. If I remove one earbud to converse, I bump it. I’ve not once intentionally used a gesture-based control on an earbud for anything else other than undoing the situation I’ve caused by bumping them. Otherwise, I control everything with my phone. If I’m working out, I just select my playlist, mute notifications, and I don’t have to touch anything after that. Gesture-based earbuds are not for me.

            I really don’t think there are dumb bluetooth earbuds, though. At least, I haven’t been able to find any.

            • zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              I have the Samsung Galaxy Buds Plus and their app has an option to disable touches, so that’s what I do, because I’m the same as you. I bought them used and have been using them on a daily basis for at least three years and they’re still working well. Might be something to look into. I hope you find something that works for you!

            • smorgishborg@toast.ooo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Could always get one of the beanies that have bluetooth speakers in 'em. It’ll solve your problem of bumping your earbuds, (though not through a necessarily “good” option). Or, you could use the wired bluetooth headphones like these.

              As another alternative, there’s the apple airpods, which, as far as I can tell, have not gestures but some weird-ass pseudo capacitive button that makes a sound when you press them. I did just realize though, that if you have an apple device they’ll automatically pause playback when you take a headphone out (I think), so that may not be your cup of tea. However, if you have an Android, this addition won’t work unless you have an app like CAPods (which you can turn on or off in the app, so no worries there). There’s also the downside of not having access to many features like toggling through the different modes (active noise canceling or whatever other bullshit like that), not being able to natively see the battery of the case or earbuds (though, like with the aforementioned feature, using an app like CAPods you can see it), and some others that I can’t recall at the moment.

              Sorry about the length of this reply, I was originally just going to mention the bluetooth beanies as a joke, but I have nothing else to do at the moment, so why not share my experiences? Anywho, that’s my two cents, this could help, it could be utterly useless, you could already know all of this, you may not even read the wall of text, etc. etc… Do as you will with this.

              • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                You don’t happen to know if there’s some open-source software for Android that might be similar to CAPods? Tbh I’m probably never going to buy either airpods or the brand-name Samsung ones, but I’d imagine there might be a more universal solution?

                • smorgishborg@toast.ooo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Yeah, I don’t actually recommend buying airpods unless you got them for free if you’re an Android user (that’s the only reason I’m using airpods atm).

                  As to open source, I believe CAPods is, unless you’re referring to an open source app for most headphones (which upon second thought you probably are).

                  As to that question, CAPods, according to their GitHub page, supports a few Beats devices, this app for Galaxy Buds on Windows/Linux devices, and this one for Huawei Freebuds device(s?).

                  Overall, the closest I could find was GadgetBridge, which has support (partial or full) for a few Samsung devices, one Nothing, a few Sony, and Bose(?), though, I did keep running into internal server errors, so it might be out of date.

            • Perfide@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I have a pair of cheap Skullcandy’s that have physical buttons instead of touch sensors. The buttons are basically impossible to use without smooshing the earbud into your ear trying to click it, but it also means it’s really hard to accidentally click them. Probably as close as you can get to dumb Bluetooth earbuds.

              • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                I don’t even understand why someone would want controls on their earbuds, much less for it to be such a widespread issue, but honestly I’m just going to make sure my next phone has a 3.5mm jack

      • RiverGhost@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve had an S10E for a while and didn’t even know the headphone jacks are no longer the norm!

          • RiverGhost@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I was lucky i found this store that sells second hand devices from big companies that have bought too many? ( dunno how it actually works), but the quality is sometimes fully new, or have been used briefly; much cheaper and older models like my S10E, which I think it’s from 2018.

            I tend to break phones rather often unfortunately (very clumsy, small hands and lack of pockets) so I want to have something like this still available. I do use screen and case protectors and all that. It still lands on the floor quite often :/

      • Perfide@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not really, it’s mostly only budget phones that have it nowadays. The S10E(which stands for ‘essential’ btw, not ‘enterprise’) is almost 5 years old, not exactly representative of the modern phone market.

        • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          To be fair, on the modern phone market it doesn’t really matter whether you spend 300 or 1000. They’re all decent ish

    • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      People keep going on about that and I get it from the point of not having to charge headphones all the time. But to me that is a very mild inconvenience compared to having to deal with those fucking cables all the time. I hate cables so damn much.

      • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh, my problem isn’t with charging them. They actually hold a charge for a super long time.

        I’d like bluetooth earbuds a lot more if I could find some that aren’t “smart.” If I put on a beanie, I bump them. If I remove one earbud to converse, I bump it. I’ve not once intentionally used a gesture-based control on an earbud for anything else other than undoing the situation I’ve caused by bumping them. Otherwise, I control everything with my phone. If I’m working out, I just select my playlist, mute notifications, and I don’t have to touch anything after that. Gesture-based earbuds are not for me.

        I really don’t think there are dumb bluetooth earbuds, though. At least, I haven’t been able to find any.

        And I don’t mind cables as much as you do. I think my favorite earbuds would be those that are connected to each other by a cable, but again – only if they were not smart.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            For most of these, turning off touch controls means that when you accidentally trigger the touch commands, it plays a little jingle and pushes a notification telling you that youve disabled touch controls and you need to reenable them.

            Completely defeating the fucking point of turning off touch controls, and making me want to wrap my hands around the throat of the idiot who designed that

            • Person264@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              On my buds if I turn on “block touches” and I touch them nothing happens, no jingle or notification. But yeah that does sound like a stupid feature

          • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’ll look into it. The only bluetooth earbuds I currently have are an off brand called SYNRGY. Maybe there’s some setting that I’m not aware of to disable touch controls too. I’ve also considered applying a few coats of clear nail polish. Maybe that would work?

            I actually don’t know anyone who has the official Samsung ones.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              The brand is Jabra, they have an app associated with them where you can change various settings on how the earbuds work. One of them is what the buttons do.

        • clearleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          This might sound crazy but apple earbuds would be good for you. I actually like having pause and skip buttons, and apparently these do have controls when you touch them, but that’s never worked for me. I think it’s intentionally broken on android which in your case makes them good.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s more than just having to charge them I wouldn’t even really consider that much of a downside with how long they last. I haven’t yet ran out of charge before I was ready to take mine out. The actual downsides are- Wireless earbuds are expensive. The batteries in them wear out over time and you have to buy all new ones which is wasteful. Bluetooth adds a noticeable delay that sucks when watching video. My car doesn’t have bluetooth so I need a headphone jack for AUX. I have both and like wireless ones when I’m on the go but if I’m stationary wired don’t cause any problems.

    • Zekas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      This going away has just make the Tiktok tide that much more horrendous. I work in a school. The hallways are nothing but that horrid shit blasting out of hundreds of bad speakers.

      • Chailles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        You don’t think it’d still be the same even with the headphone jack still there? Wireless headphones and converters for wired headphones do exist, they just don’t care.

      • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        My condolences. I stress out the moment a child thrusts a phone in front of me to watch a “funny” video

        I can only imagine the hellscape that is your school

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Get a dongle. Get several. Stick them on the ends of all your headphones and aux cables and forget that you don’t have a headphone jack on your phone.

      • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        I do have one. That’s how I listen to music in my old ass car XD

        But still I wish they’d just never removed something that was so useful and immediately accessible to everyone

    • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      HTC just came out with a phone that has a headphone jack AND expandable memory. I hope they go for a gen 2 in the near future since it had some kinks to work out, such as a curved glass screen, becase then it would be just about everything I could ask for in a phone.

  • Liz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    ·
    11 months ago

    Physical buttons in cars

    Repairable phones

    Repairable laptops

    Resoleable shoes

    Hand-crank drills (for those quick and easy projects where dealing with batteries or cords isn’t worth it)

    External frames on hiking packs

    Actually tough jeans that need to be broken in and last a while

    Headphone jack

  • Tier 1 Build-A-Bear 🧸@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Headphone jack, bigger batteries, front facing speakers, SD card slot, IR blaster, magnetic field to let you use your credit cards at check out from your phone (MST) - THROUGH THE ACTUAL CARD READER SO THEY DIDN’T NEED GOOGLE/APPLE/SAMSUNG WALLET WHATEVER THE FUCK. I also agree that I miss the light too lol

    That said, here’s what I can’t stand in newer phones: camera bumps. Unless you’re a droid x or Nexus get that rocking on any flat service while I’m trying to type shit outta here. I don’t give a shit about my cameras but if they need to be that fat and advanced, just make the rest of the phone that fat and give me the extra battery instead of making a tiny stovetop in the corner. Fuckin weird and dumb. Also camera cutouts in the screen, put that shit under the screen or set it next to a front facing speaker on the bezel. Also bezel-less phones, I know we’re trying to fill our phones with screens but my fat palms don’t care about that when I’m accidentally touching everything on the side while holding it

  • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    11 months ago

    By far replaceable batteries. You used to be able to purchase physically larger and higher capacity batteries to get insane battery life, but because they would include a larger rear plastic for the phone it would still look normal. Now we have to waste space and lose efficiency with external power banks.

  • mkhopper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    11 months ago

    Physical buttons in cars for radio and environment settings.

    There used to be a time when I could have my hand on the gear shifter and just reach out with my fingers to change radio stations or adjust the heat or a/c without needing to look down at all.
    Now with modern touchscreens in cars, you can’t do any of that. I have gotten used to playing with the radio via the steering wheel buttons, but anything else requires hunting around, looking for the correct spot to touch the screen.
    And yet they say, “don’t take your eyes off the road!”

  • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    11 months ago

    IR blaster for smartphones. I still have one on mine and I can use it for tons of stuff, not just as a TV remote.

    I even worked for a company who made lots of IR based products (taps/faucets, accessibility stuff) and it was amazing how many people had to buy the dedicated remotes for these products for extra money.

    When I asked them if their phone has an IR blaster, so they could just download a free app and use it instead. “I have an iPhone” was the most common answer.

    • aard@kyu.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 months ago

      There are small and cheap USB-C IR dongles around nowadays - generally USB-C has been a blessing for making additional hardware features available on smartphones.

      My current phone does have IR - though I’m not really using it much since most of the existing Android software for that is horrible (broken, ad-infested, requires account and access to everything, …), and I have too many open projects to start another one for writing my own software for that.

  • puppy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    In smartphones

    1. Replaceable batteries
    2. Headphone jack
    3. Software unlocked parts
    4. Root-able phones

    In PCs

    1. No-RGB components that only prioritise performance
    2. No nonsense PC cases that are just a black box with awesome airflow
    3. GPUs that don’t need a mortgage
  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    11 months ago

    Kinda surprised that no one has mentioned the FM tuner. For reasons I never really understood, a lot of companies continued to build the hardware into phones but then wall it off with firmware.

    My first MP3 player had one, my TV had one, there were even watches and lots of other devices that had one. People still listen to radio, so why don’t they give us a tuner?

    • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      11 months ago

      Mostly because they needed a wired headset to act as the FM antenna since it needs a decent length to capture FM compared to the much higher UHF and GHz frequencies that the mobile network uses.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          Imagine blowing out your phone speakers because you put your phone on the charger while listening to the radio.

          Typically speaking, it’s a bad idea to use power sources as an antenna. Because power pushes a lot more amps than something like a radio signal.

            • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              My point is that any sort of radio would be immediately drowned out by the massive amounts of EM interference as soon as you tried to charge.

              In fact, professional audio devices often have to take extra precautions to avoid their power cables from becoming accidental antennas; Anyone who used a cheap set of computer speakers back in the 2000’s and 2010’s will know the distinct buzzing pattern that preceded a text message or phone call. That’s because cheap speakers would use unshielded power sources, and simple circuitry which didn’t bother to isolate the amplifier from the power.

    • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Mostly because they needed a wired headset to act as the FM antenna since it needs a decent length to capture FM compared to the much higher UHF and GHz frequencies that the mobile network uses.

    • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Are you sure the hardware is still there? I only ask because given the number of hackers out there, I’m surprised someone hasn’t come out with a patch or something to make it more ubiquitous.

      • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        A lot of it isn’t there anymore….

        But because it was a hardware thing, the patch would involve rooting your phone, something most people won’t do.

      • FerbFletcher@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        i think I recall that the Bluetooth hardware is essentially an FM tuner. Just needed a wired headphone to use as an antenna. My Moto Stylus 2022 still has it.

  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    11 months ago

    Pretty much everything the Galaxy S5 had

    • Notification LED
    • IR blaster
    • Replaceable battery
    • Headphone jack
    • Heart rate monitor
    • SD card slot

    I currently use a FP3 which has 4 out of the 6 features above, which I feel is the best we’ll get right now.

    Admittedly the Heart rate monitor is more of a gimmick nowadays, especially that it’s standard and automatic on most smartwatches and sports watches. Back then when stuff like the Sony Ericsson LiveView and LG W100 watches were popular, they did not have heart rate sensing built in

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    11 months ago

    Everything. We’re down to barebones and marketing now focus solely on camera software updates or phone materials (“now with titanium!” How fucking sad is that?) And they are all selling the same phone.

    Some of the most important loses…

    Swappable batteries changed travel for me. Always having two extra charged batteries in my backpack, that you could swap top 100% in 20 seconds, made me ONLY use my phone as a free and completely useful tool without any planning or restrictions on my use. Otherwise, you can’t take too many pictures or videos, stream music or video or make video calls too long or you might be fucked when you need phone, GPS, payment or to get a rideshare to where you’re staying.

    Audio jack similarly meant freedom. Bluetooth headphones out of battery, broken or one earbud lost? Have a pair of wired in the backpack always add backup. Also better audio quality through wired with DAC on certain models and less daily device load to charge/babysit

    secondary screens LG V10 had a bar on top, they also had the T shaped dual screen phone and the secondary screen phone case. There was just creativity and attempts at innovation.

    microSD expandable memory, again less and less available and this was about freedom - fuck your cloud storage add its data leaks, corruption and redaction. I own my data, you don’t control it.