• Forester@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    This is the fediverse it’s full of new people, adventurers, change makers. The majority of people who would be interested in this platform will have a more progressive bent. So the majority of people here will be more accepting of liberal policies.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      23 days ago

      Quibble: Many here are explicitly leftist, in the a leftist-not-liberal sense, and will even use “liberal” derogatorily. So, progressive, yes, but liberal, not necessarily.

      • Libra00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        23 days ago

        Good point, many think left = liberal = US democrats who are centrists at best from the international perspective. So no, most people on here probably aren’t actual leftists, but I’m guessing when they say they ‘lean left’ they mean US-liberal-not-conservative, not socialist or whatever.

      • Forester@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 days ago

        From my perspective I think that that is very silly. I don’t care for purity tests, but what would I know? I’m just a dirty libertarian.

        • Libra00@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          23 days ago

          It isn’t a purity test, it’s a necessary accommodation of the fact that people in the US (and I say this as an American) think that the left ends at progressive liberalism, while everyone else in the world sees progressive liberalism as center-left at best because they acknowledge that ‘the left’ extends quite far past the bounds of Liberalism (the philosophy, not the political leaning), because Liberalism is about individualism and property rights but most people to the left of that are collectivist in some way shape or form.

            • Maeve@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              23 days ago

              Thanks. I look forward to learning about libertarianism with and from you. Not saying I’ll agree, but that I look forward to learning more.

              • Forester@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                23 days ago

                Personally myself, I’m a bit of a geoist and a bit of a minarchist. I would advise that if you are interested you should start reading, John Lock and David Henry Thoreaus essays on governent and from there branch out.

      • hypnicjerk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 days ago

        to make matters more fun, many ‘explicitly leftist’ lemmings are tankies (blind supporters of russia, china, north korea, etc), who are explicitly not leftist but authoritarians masquerading in the skinsuit of the people’s revolution.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 days ago

      it’s full of new people,

      Don’t be ridiculous. I’m not a new people. I’ve been a people for almost my whole life. I bet most of us have.

      • Libra00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        Not me, I’ve only been a person for the past couple years. Prior to that I was a caffeine-powered AI.

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Most people everywhere are slightly left of centre*. Most leaders everywhere are slightly right of centre*.

    *Not in the American sense. Y’all crazy.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    23 days ago

    Not only that, I’ve tried pitching the fediverse to right wing people, but they didn’t bite.

    Even the crypto bros that were all about decentralization couldn’t see why a decentralized social media platform was superior.

    This also didn’t matter for people who care about “free speech”.

    You think the allure of being fully independent and having your own instance would be right up their alley given how they value independence, but nope.

    Seriously? Why isn’t there a right wing instance? My guess is that a right wing person can’t fathom owning something that benefits others which doesn’t give them back profit.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      23 days ago

      You think the allure of being fully independent and having your own instance would be right up their alley given how they value independence, but nope.

      Because it’s not about freedom of speech for them, it’s about freedom to force people to listen. Having their own server where they can shout at each other all day doesn’t serve their purpose. Their panties get wet by forcing others to listen.

        • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          The only one I know of shut down and the admin posted this message:

          I knew Lemmy had its challenges, but I hoped it would evolve for the better. Sadly after 2 years, the culture of censorship through defederation has only grown stronger.

          So they shutdown because they couldn’t federate with any other instances and considered that censorship. A few people in that thread linked to another instance I’ve never heard of as an alternative and that one 404s if you type in the address so I guess they’re all still on reddit and twitter.

          • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            23 days ago

            So they shutdown because they couldn’t federate with any other instances and considered that censorship

            Damn, I actually didn’t see that coming, I guess they will move the goal post from any starting point.

              • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                ·
                23 days ago

                Cause no one is stopping you from going to said instance and just having the discussion there.

                If there was this super important leak that needed to be out there, if it’s posted on a right wing instance that is a defederated ghost town, it’s still out there. People can link to it and leverage the instance to have the needed discussions.

                Censorship means removing access, defederation does not wipe it off of the Internet.

                • Gloomy@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  I would argue that censorship includes the suppression of information in its definition, not only it’s removal.

    • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      23 days ago

      Trump’s tremendous social media platform truth dot barf runs on Activity Pub, they just don’t federate with anyone by default. It’s like they don’t want dissenting views on there. Weird.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      23 days ago

      Because “crypto bros” care about making money, not any ideology, except in a performative sense. If you pitched the fediverse to the original researchers inventing cryptocurrency and the early adopters, they would likely be receptive. But these are no longer associated with the current crypto crowd.

      • Fredthefishlord
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 days ago

        They don’t care about making money, they care about gambling and having a gambling addiction and trying to justify it

    • Libra00@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      Like everything on the right, decentralization is a means to an end, not a value in itself. They only care about it when it’s useful for helping them get ahead. Just like they only care about free speech when it’s them speaking to people who don’t want to hear their bullshit.

    • amino
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      there are 3 major right-wing instances: lemmy.ml(ran by the Lemmy developers), lemmygrad.ml(the openly fascist version of lemmy.ml) and hexbear.net.

      if anyone wants to argue, I don’t. Anyone supporting Russia is right-wing. Authoritarianism is inherently conservative, reactionary and therefore right-wing.

    • Letme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      “free speech”, as your quotation marks imply, does not really exist outside of theory. In reality, free speech is a set of laws governing hate speech or other dangerous speech.

      Both the right and the left have ideas of what they think these laws should be.

      But there is no such thing as “free speech” in the real world.

  • pubquiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    23 days ago

    By LEFT do you infer compassion, empathy, and class solidarity? In contrast, by RIGHT do you infer me-first, only my rights matter and only those in my clan deserve to be cared about?

    Then, yes.

  • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I believe all life have value, no matter what.

    I believe in justice and equality.

    I believe in the rule if law.

    I believe in democracy.

    I believe in the freedom of speech.

    I believe in religious freedom.

    I believe no one should go hungry.

    I believe no one should freeze.

    I believe no one should die from preventable diseases.

    I believe everyone has a right to education.

    I believe everyone has a right to healthcare.

    I believe everyone has a right to participate in society and the internet.

    I believe everyone should contribute if they can, because that is fair.

    I believe people should be able to retire.

    I believe most people are good, and want to do good.

    I believe in cooperation, and working towards a common goal.

    I believe that all people should have a minimum set of rights, that are non-negotiable.

    I trust my neighbours, my family and strangers.

    Based on these values I could be placed anywhere from center-right to far-left in Europe.

    In the US I am a filthy commie

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    If you consider Democrats left wing then yes, by far the most here are left wing, since by most European standards Democrats are clearly right wing.

    Republicans are extreme right by most standards. Republican (MAGA) is basically an American version of AfD!
    So by that standard I guess about 80% here are left wing, maybe even more?

    • TheFudd@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      23 days ago

      See, this is why so many right-wingers are seen as simply not intelligent enough to understand basic science. Numerous studies have shown that the left-wing is on average, plumper, juicier, and more tender.

      I bet you probably also believe those wing pieces with two bones are better than the big one-bone wings that look like little chicken legs, too. Typical right-winger, your brain has been melted by right-wing propaganda.

      Sorry, but reality has a left-wing bias. Educate yourself, and do better.

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        I’m as left-wing as they come but to imply that drummies are somehow superior to flats is wrong-headed and shows your own biases. I’ll concede that the little chicken legs are easier (and more fun) to eat, but the quality of the delicate meat between the two little wing bones in the flats ones makes them more of a delight to me.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    23 days ago

    My priorities in politics is:

    1. Don’t wreck the economy.
    2. Uphold the rule of law.

    In my country that makes me right leaning. In the US with the current president that apparently makes me a leftist.

  • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Anti-Conservative

    There is no such thing as liberalism — or progressivism, etc.

    There is only conservatism. No other political philosophy actually exists; by the political analogue of Gresham’s Law, conservatism has driven every other idea out of circulation.

    There might be, and should be, anti-conservatism; but it does not yet exist. What would it be? In order to answer that question, it is necessary and sufficient to characterize conservatism. Fortunately, this can be done very concisely.

    Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:

    There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

    There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time.

    For millenia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of polity had ever been proposed. “The king can do no wrong.” In practice, this immunity was always extended to the king’s friends, however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the king’s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an individual.

    As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today, the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself — backed up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence.

    So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

    Then the appearance arises that the task is to map “liberalism”, or “progressivism”, or “socialism”, or whateverthefuckkindofstupidnoise-ism, onto the core proposition of anti-conservatism.

    No, it a’n’t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get:

    The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

    • Frank Wilhoit
  • Ideonek@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Maybe. But your impression of it may be skewed, because there are a lot of non-USA people here. That creste some mismatch in terms that tend to overwaight the perceived size of left-leaning people. But it’s terminology, really. What in USA is considered “left” more-or-less align with what is considered left outside of USA. But what an average Trump supporter call “conservative”, in the rest of the word is simply know as lunacy.

    • AdaA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      23 days ago

      What in USA is considered “left” more-or-less align with what is considered left outside of USA

      What is considered left in the USA is largely considered center or center right outside of the USA

      • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 days ago

        Most current US Democrats are Neoliberal Reagan Republicans.

        US Republicans since Reagan are fucking Nazis.

      • Ideonek@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 days ago

        Well, it’s a big and heterogeneous “outside” if we want to be nitpicky about it.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    23 days ago

    Yes. Signing up is not easy. Most people here can understand written instructions and have some basic technical knowledge. People who are not stupid tend to lean left.