• 2 Posts
  • 911 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
















  • What you believe you have is implicit evidence of corruption. Not explicit. And you just. Don’t. Have it.

    I feel like you’re failing to understand that my annoyance at her not living in district is not the same issue, though it is a contributing factor, in why I think she’s likely corrupt.

    I do think it’s fine for someone to represent anyone from any area - as long as they can convince the people from that area to vote for them

    A complete difference in foundational thought of what makes someone a good fit for an area will go no where in discussion.

    if you didn’t bob and weave through so many layers of random accusations and bullshit to get here

    My point on her being out of district was from the start.



  • with someone who spends more money on the poor than on advertising?

    Interesting way to phrase vote buying.

    Your objections seem really really weak.

    She hasn’t even lived nearby for a year yet. Not living inside isn’t some small objection, it’s a major issue.

    using social media effectively to gain popularity

    Influencer personality with no substance to back it up. She could start at a local level and work her way up. Jumping to the top with no experience is how you get an ineffective politician who’s incapable.

    Were you or one of your friends hoping to stand or something?

    No.

    You seem to be accusing her of being suspicious because she’s doing things you think are unfairly popular

    No? Her policies have little to do with why she’s an issue. I’m accusing her of being suspicious because she’s acting too fast and without proven history, in an area she’s never lived in. She doesn’t know what the area actually needs.

    It only takes a quick glance at her platform to see

    Despite what the right may have told you, the Green New Deal is not some woke scam to ban beef farming or take away your old Corvette.

    She doesn’t exactly understand the area in the first place. She’s campaigning to a population that is centrist. When the area is straight blue, it’s pure condescending

    Almost her entire campaign is the boilerplate minimum it takes to get elected in the area.


  • No, I’m not terribly hung up on the location thing. I think they should absolutely be local, and she’s pretty goddamn close

    She only just moved into the state less than a year ago…

    Not caring about the location is for a different political system. In ours, location is important.

    I think it’s entirely valid to run in a district when you clearly align with the values of that district.

    What indicates that to you? You don’t live here, do you know the values of the area?

    But you don’t, do you? You’re just asking questions.

    I have provided explicit evidence in the form of largely out of state donations and not being in district as to show why she should not be elected in the district. As well as vote buying through using campaign funds in charity.

    you don’t fucking have it.*

    No, you just think it’s fine for someone who has not even lived in an area to represent them. That’s just a recipe for pure corruption. It means they won’t actually understand the values or wants of the areas. You are simply pretending it is fine because it suits your views best