• surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s not the tool that’s the problem. It’s the capitalists controlling it.

    The luddites didn’t oppose technology just for the sake of it. They opposed the use of it to displace workers. And there is absolutely a role for AI in all this that doesn’t involve anyone losing their jobs, if we can change who is in control of it.

    Personally, I’m looking forward to seeing what can be done with the tech to make each person’s experience unique, with bespoke quests and dialogue. Maybe one day playing a game like Skyrim for 10 years doesn’t have to mean playing the same quests over and over. It’ll be cool comparing how our playthroughs differ from each other, as the AI changes the game to suit each person.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “AI” can’t do that, because we have nothing approaching artificial intelligence yet-we have a statistical model based on finding averages. it can only do mass produced pablum. all the quests will become the same ‘a skyrim quest’. the technology currently being called “AI” will literally never be capable of doing this, at no scale, and it has largely reached the largest scale it can possibly work on with the amount of information available, and it’s getting hapsburgy with the data equivalent of inbreeding+prions, so it can’t really improve on future information.

      and you can’t really make something smart enough to do what you’re describing well without being a person who would need autonomy and freedom and stuff, because slavery is bad. creativity is kind of a big deal.

      and you are completely missing so god damn many of the points of art. which video games are.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I understand where a lot of the opposition to AI comes from. I get it. But when you’re so deep in the opposition that you’re saying it’ll never do thing that it’s already doing, you’re obviously just pushing an agenda without facts backing it up.

        This is like arguing calculators sully math, because it should be done with an abacus.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          im saying either you’re selling pablum in ambrosia bottles, or it’s a mechanical turk to sell this shit.

          because there’s so much shit being done to sell this shit, and the real effects of it are apocalyptic. I have no tolerance for boosters.

            • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              it’s not AI, dude. not even ‘kind of a dumb guy equivalent, but genuinely intelligence’. if it was, I’d be saying it has rights and we have a duty to keep these models running because they’re people and shit.

              but it’s not, and it’s being used to run out the clock and fuck up labor so the world ends of climate change before we have a revolution, and the billionaires can retreat to their bunkers.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well yeah, AI is a tool for the wealthy to remove economic opportunities from the working class.

    Now get back in the mine, slave.

    • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      2 days ago

      AI is no where good enough for that. But these rich fucks want their customers to accept shitty quality and to force artists and developers to accept shitty pay so that they can keep more for themselves. Hence, they are so obsessed with AI.

      • Pechente@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        2 days ago

        Knowing some of these higher ups myself, I‘m pretty sure most of them cannot tell great quality from garbage and do not care about good products. It’s only ever about the short term numbers.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sorry to be the one to inform you but it’s already happening. Many places are turning to AI art to avoid paying artists.

        • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes I know. That pisses me off the most. I hate how rich fucks will do anything to avoid paying people or hiring people. It’s like they are willfully ignorant of the idea that if there are no employees, there will be no customers.

        • Bilb!@lem.monster
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s awesome. Human expression is unpredictable and dangerous and the faster we move past it the better.

        • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Current AI is not something that will get much better than this through iteration alone. Current ‘AI’ technologies are hardly more than statistical parrots. We are missing many fundamental pieces to create an actual AI that is more intelligent than a bug.

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Jokes on them. If they replace everyone’s job with AI there will be a whole lot of unemployed people with nothing better to do other than build guillotines.

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If the working class doesn’t have work, the working class doesn’t have the money to buy the shit the CEOs have their companies put out, which will have the CEOs lose money.

    But CEOs don’t think that far ahead. Because their bean counting education didn’t teach that.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      money is just a smoke screen.

      it’s about who does the work, who gets the rewards, and who decides what work gets done.

      their ideal is: slaves, who get the bare minimum to survive, but not into old age. the king (which all of these delusional oligarchs think they’ll be). the king (which all of them think they’ll be).

  • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    If anyone here is playing KC:D2, the actor for Hans Capon (Luke Dale) made a mini-docu on the threat of AI to voice acting. I thought it was well edited and presented the problem in a very digestible way for those who know little about AI, so here it is for anyone interested: https://youtu.be/R55QzK8Hles

      • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        How far in are you? In the beginning section of the game, >!Henry and Hans have a big fallout, but it eases up after the first main story beat!<.

        • I just started it up yesterday, and went to bed right after their big fight. So it does sound like that was supposed to happen. Now I wonder if I could have avoided being arrested. Like I have failed every single speech check the game has given me, and I know at least 2 things could have been way different than it ended up going because of those failures. lol

          • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            No, there’s a few dialogue choices but they’ll all result in Hans hating you at the start of the game. I had to replay the intro for missed achievements (initially pirated to benchmark/see if I liked the game b4 buying) and did different choices up to the big fight. The intro is railroaded.

          • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Don’t worry too much about early game speech checks. The game knows your skill levels are low, so the story plays into Henry needing to improve. Also, don’t be afraid to flee a fight you aren’t prepared for. You won’t majorly ruin future content unless you start murder hobo-ing. Enjoy the game! It’s quite a treat in my opinion :)

  • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    AI could have some pretty cool uses as an enhancement to voice actors. Imagine all of the NPCs in an RPG being able to say the customized name of your character aloud instead of everyone using a title or nickname that you were assigned. It’s a real shame that we have to use everything for evil instead.

    • zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve seen lover’s lab. I know what kind of things NPCs will be forced to call the player.

      But it would also be tempting to name a character Jugemu Jugemu Go-Kō-no-Surikire Kaijari-suigyo no Suigyō-matsu Unrai-matsu Fūrai-matsu Kū-Neru Tokoro ni Sumu Tokoro Yaburakōji no Burakōji Paipo Paipo Paipo no Shūringan Shūringan no Gūrindai Gūrindai no Ponpokopii no Ponpokonā no Chōkyūmei no Chōsuke.

    • djidane535@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Exactly. I think there are legitimate usages for this technology (eg voices for dynamic content, or when the original voice actor is dead or not available to voice again his/her characters). But everything should be done with the consent of the voice actors, and not in an attempt to replace the work that could be done by a voice actor in the first place.

      It probably won’t happen, since money leads the way :/.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    The problem is the way they’re pushing the tools as magic lamps, and shoving them down everyone’s throats.

    AI is a really neat tool that got dragged into an incredibly toxic system that enshittified it. Not a useful tool to help development, no, skip straight to replacing employees even if it doesn’t freaking work.

    • applebusch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just a reminder you can say fucking here. Fucking fuck shit you can, and holy fucking dogshit does that cunt fucking AI bullshit not even fucking work to replace a fucking intern, let alone a full ass engineer.

      • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        TikTok, Twitch, Youtube, etc etc did a number on people, training them to self censor like that.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    I had a thought earlier in the bathroom about AI. It’s like building a fancy indoor toilet when you don’t have plumbing.

    If people’s basic needs were met, housing food health care all that, then it wouldn’t really matter as much if people want to fuck around with AI. People who do things for passion could still do so.

    But we live in a capitalist hell, this AI stuff will primarily benefit the ownership class while everyone else suffers.

    I don’t need a fancy toilet. I need clean running water.

  • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m about half way through Blood in the Machine by Brian Merchant, a book about the Luddites, and one of the things he’s emphasised quite a lot is the complaints of people at the time about the lower quality of automated textiles compared to artisan-made ones.

    • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Good point, I am checking myself periodically: have I become a luddite?

      Well, we improved machines. We are not going to make the “AI” understand what a finger is and how many of them humans have

      • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        You should be a Luddite because they were right. My point wasn’t that we should embrace AI (trust me, I’m one of its most dedicated haters), but that just because technology produces lower quality goods doesn’t mean it won’t catch on. It’s going to take more than jeering mockery to stop capitalist embracing something that lets them deskill workers.

        • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          True. To stop the spiral into more and more shitty world is going to take some fundamental work

          /theatrical sigh/ Guess I will be questioning why the hell it had not been done already thousands of years before I was born for many more years to come

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I want to agree with Beart but…

    SAG et al have already more or less abandoned voice actors. In the very near future it won’t matter if actors agree to work for these companies because they won’t NEED those actors. They’ll have training data or they’ll pay randos off the street to generate some training data that they then heavily tweak to sound like Ashley Burch and so forth.

    And before people pretend that consumers won’t stand for that: Anyone with any knowledge of scene composition or lighting clowns on Netflix et al near constnatly. Guess what the super popular movies that everyone watches are? Because, yeah, there will still be works of art like a Blade Runner or even an Anora (the plot was shite but the cinematography was peak). They’ll pale in comparison to people pretending they aren’t going to watch Happy Gilmore 2.

    And same with VA. People will claim they are opposed and it is horrible and complete trash compared to a human… and they’ll still buy the games until having “human” voice acting is the exception and only for “arthouse” games.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      SAG et al have already more or less abandoned voice actors.

      As one who has a spouse who is a member, yup. I think that it’s elitism sabotaging the solidarity. Silver screen actors want to see themselves as better than voice/video game actors so, instead of pushing for massive membership drives and organizing an industry that desperately needs it, they sell them down the river with contracts with AI companies. It’s a bit infuriating. SAG has the resources to destroy non-union acting in video games but seldom shows any signs of being inclined to stand by they colleagues.