“AI” can’t do that, because we have nothing approaching artificial intelligence yet-we have a statistical model based on finding averages. it can only do mass produced pablum. all the quests will become the same ‘a skyrim quest’. the technology currently being called “AI” will literally never be capable of doing this, at no scale, and it has largely reached the largest scale it can possibly work on with the amount of information available, and it’s getting hapsburgy with the data equivalent of inbreeding+prions, so it can’t really improve on future information.
and you can’t really make something smart enough to do what you’re describing well without being a person who would need autonomy and freedom and stuff, because slavery is bad. creativity is kind of a big deal.
and you are completely missing so god damn many of the points of art. which video games are.
I understand where a lot of the opposition to AI comes from. I get it. But when you’re so deep in the opposition that you’re saying it’ll never do thing that it’s already doing, you’re obviously just pushing an agenda without facts backing it up.
This is like arguing calculators sully math, because it should be done with an abacus.
it’s not AI, dude. not even ‘kind of a dumb guy equivalent, but genuinely intelligence’. if it was, I’d be saying it has rights and we have a duty to keep these models running because they’re people and shit.
but it’s not, and it’s being used to run out the clock and fuck up labor so the world ends of climate change before we have a revolution, and the billionaires can retreat to their bunkers.
“AI” can’t do that, because we have nothing approaching artificial intelligence yet-we have a statistical model based on finding averages. it can only do mass produced pablum. all the quests will become the same ‘a skyrim quest’. the technology currently being called “AI” will literally never be capable of doing this, at no scale, and it has largely reached the largest scale it can possibly work on with the amount of information available, and it’s getting hapsburgy with the data equivalent of inbreeding+prions, so it can’t really improve on future information.
and you can’t really make something smart enough to do what you’re describing well without being a person who would need autonomy and freedom and stuff, because slavery is bad. creativity is kind of a big deal.
and you are completely missing so god damn many of the points of art. which video games are.
I understand where a lot of the opposition to AI comes from. I get it. But when you’re so deep in the opposition that you’re saying it’ll never do thing that it’s already doing, you’re obviously just pushing an agenda without facts backing it up.
This is like arguing calculators sully math, because it should be done with an abacus.
im saying either you’re selling pablum in ambrosia bottles, or it’s a mechanical turk to sell this shit.
because there’s so much shit being done to sell this shit, and the real effects of it are apocalyptic. I have no tolerance for boosters.
Ok, John Connor. Maybe chill out a bit.
it’s not AI, dude. not even ‘kind of a dumb guy equivalent, but genuinely intelligence’. if it was, I’d be saying it has rights and we have a duty to keep these models running because they’re people and shit.
but it’s not, and it’s being used to run out the clock and fuck up labor so the world ends of climate change before we have a revolution, and the billionaires can retreat to their bunkers.