• Geodad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m honestly looking for work in the EU. If I can land a job, I’ll get established and then bring my family over.

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The Ratchet effect.

    With this current trump slop, the democrats can shift farther right than they’ve ever been and gain tons of moderates and even conservatives who just feel sour on trump, and obviously they get the liberal moderates, because trump slop.

    Republicans shift right by 10, dems shift right by 6 and seem progressive in comparison.

    Billionaires continue getting richer, and we all get fucked. Eat, sleep, repeat.

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Obama’s legacy:

    Biden’s legacy:

    The democrats are a brutal, vicious, genocidal party.

    • rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Ah yes, the hilariously idiotic progressive purity test. Biden is the most progressive president in the last 50 years and you morons call him genocide Joe.

      • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        Conducting a genocide automatically removes all “progressive” credibility as it’s the worst and least progressive thing you can do.

        Calling him progressive, let alone “The most progressive” is an insult to the very idea of “progress” and legitimizes genocide.

        Grab a piece of paper and list the ways in which he was “progressive” and explain, on paper, how they excuse his genocide. Read it back out loud.

        Also maybe stop insulting people, calling them morons, for not ignoring his genocide.

        • rusticus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          45 minutes ago

          lol. Name a US president in the last 50 years that is more progressive than Biden. We’ll wait.

          • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            26 minutes ago

            If you already made and read back a list of all of Bidens progressive policies and the ways they excuse his genocide in the 4 minutes it took you to respond, then that itself proves both that he wasn’t very progressive and also it doesn’t take much to get you personally on board with genocide.

      • Heyting@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        Nederlands
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 minutes ago

        Did Joe not send Israel almost all of the bombs and other resources it’s using to commit genocide on the Palestinian people?

        • rusticus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          Just like every US president in the last 50 years. Name a more progressive US president during the last 50 years.

          • Heyting@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            Nederlands
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 minutes ago

            I don’t care about your previous presidents. I care that Joe is responsible for a genocide on the Palestinians and that you seem to think that that’s a petty issue.

      • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        42 minutes ago

        remember when Joe Biden stepped in to stop a federal railway strike, which was asking for more (basically any) time off, an end to precision scheduled railroading, and for basic safety regulations and maintenance, and then two weeks later a train derailed in Ohio from faulty brakes and bathed the area in hydrogen chloride, benzene, and phosgene, causing an ecological disaster that made the nearby area hazardous to live in?

        that’s progress, baby!! 🎉🎉

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Supplying a genocide is pretty terrible, not to mention the utterly insufficeint to downright harmful domestic policy and the incredibly warhawkish foreign policy. Biden did his job as a steward of the US Empire more nakedly than Obama did, though certainly less naked than Trump now.

        It shouldn’t be surprising that leftists are critical of liberal imperialists.

        • rusticus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          If the most progressive president in 50 years isn’t good enough maybe you need to consider a different home country.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Nah, the US Empire impacts everywhere. A revolution is necessary, same as it always was. Genocide is evil, not progressive.

    • turnip@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 minutes ago

      If you read the project 2025 document you’ll see a section on the federal reserve, we seem to already be on the way there with Trump surprisingly. Which the document suggests capital punishment and a border wall, its not a document by the Fraser institute its a document crafted by Trump, you’re an fool if you cant see that.

      https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

      Without inflation, when you require raising taxes to actually pay for things, you’ll see how much people are willing to spend for their DEI institutes and doing plays for other countries to cringe at.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Im not sure if you actually looked at the words on the meme or not, but it doesn’t say they’re “exactly the same” it says they’re less evil. Democrats teamed up with war criminal Dick Cheney for fucks sake, it’s like they are actively trying to make people not vote for them.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    This meme made sense in 2012, not when the Republican Party has decided to be the Anti-Democratic Party.

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Not three months ago Gaza had a death toll well past fifty thousand by the most conservative estimates, not to mention the huge amounts of women and children maimed, malnourished and the wholesale destruction of the entire strip’s infrastructure.

      Did the republicans do that or did y’all deny reality so much in the pursuit of tHe mOsT iMpOrTanT ElEctiOn oF oUr LiFeTimE that you don’t know what fucking color the sky is unless you ask the DNC first.

      The republicans are not diametrically opposed to the democrats, they’re just the same shit but more brash, and (with Trump at the helm) too fucking incompetent to not say the quiet part out loud, maybe because they know their base is so rabid on American fascism that dogwhistles aren’t enough anymore, they need a fucking trumpet.

      • jimmy90@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        20 hours ago

        so you prefer trump and putin in power?

        did the republicans do it? of course they did. the US has been funding israel for a long time.

        • Grapho@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 hours ago

          See? Perfect example.

          Without the republicans, Dems would have no one to hide behind when their many genocides are recounted.

            • Grapho@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Are you at all able to communicate with others without resorting to deflection and loaded questions?

              • jimmy90@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                simple enough questions but as you’re so busy campaigning against the dems you must be quite happy with trump?

                • Grapho@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  I’m about as happy as I would have been with a dem, which is to say I hope they die and take the US with them and leave the rest of us alone finally.

        • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          38 minutes ago

          Who destroyed the Gaza Strip to begin with?

          There would be no “Trump plan to rebuild Gaza” is Gaza wasn’t destroyed under Biden.

          Why are you so “on board” with the destruction and genocide of Palestinians as long as it’s a Democrat doing it?

        • Grapho@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          I’d rather there were an actual human in the white house (or there not be an USA at all) but since libs are so spineless I think it’ll take the complete collapse of the US economy to get y’all to stop treating politics like a fucking team sport. You could put Mussolini on the blue team and y’all would yell at everyone for not shutting up and vooooooting.

          We’re almost there, thank fuck.

  • Sibshops@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t understand why people who think this don’t advocate for ranked choice voting. Seems like it would solve this issue, right?

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      It doesn’t. There are plenty of bourgeois democracies that don’t use FPTP for all their voting: Japan, Australia, South Korea for some of their elections. Doesn’t make a difference (except it might make the bribery a bit more expensive, since you have to buy off more political parties than just two).

      The fundamental problem is capital standing above political power. If it does so, then no amount of alternative voting systems can fix the issue. Socialism is the only answer.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      No, RCV wouldn’t. The fundamental problem of electoral politics being a game between factions pre-approved by the bourgeoisie won’t change, there are even safeguards preventing unwanted change that losing parties and government branches can pull in the rare event a worker party won.

      It’s the perfect carrot, it won’t get passed nor would it change much.

    • darthelmet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Even if it would, how would it ever get passed when the people who would need to pass it are the ones who are only in office because the system works the way it currently does?

      This is just a recurring theme I’ve found when talking with liberals. They like to think about and suggest all sorts of policy ideas as though all we’re missing are some smart ideas nobody has thought of. It’s one thing to say we should have this, but it’s another to have any idea of how it’d be possible to do. Since they have no actual analysis of the system, they’ll just turn around and tell you to vote or call your representative. “We should get money out of politics!” “Yeah, well we checked with the people giving us money and they said no. So…”

      • Sibshops@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I imagine it wouldn’t be difficult at least at the primary level. The same party has the power and they can get rid of less desirable candidates like Fetterman.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      24 hours ago

      You have a few options for enacting ranked choice voting at the national level:

      1. Win hundreds, possibly thousands, of state-level House and Senate seats with the largest grass roots voter mobilization ever seen in the US to, a) enact legislation in all 50 states or b) ratify an amendment to the constitution, that mandates it.

      2. Kill enough republicans in a national civil war to make sure that when elections happen, there aren’t enough republicans left to win an election, then enact the above.

      3. Overthrow the entire US government in a much bloodier national coup and set up whatever government you want.

      • Grapho@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Kill enough republicans in a national civil war

        And democrats, too. Don’t pretend they’re not just as responsible for keeping fptp voting, their party depends on it. If you don’t believe me, look into how coordinated the GOP and Democrats were when suing PSL and the Green party to keep them off several state ballots (and severely whittle down their grassroots funds with corporate-money lawfare). Spoiler: there was no overlap.

        It’s one party, two wings.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            14 hours ago

            What echo chamber are you talking about? Existing on the English-speaking internet at all is to be in a pro-US echo chamber, Leftists carving out little enclaves for themselves to discuss topics with other leftists doesn’t insulate them from the overwhelming majority of their existence.

    • Commiunism@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Imma be real as an European, we kinda have the same problem here even with better voting systems. You either vote for “nothing ever happens” parties or literal Russia funded reactionary nazis.

  • esc27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Scenario I’ve been playing with:

    Suppose you are kidnapped by two people. They tell you that one of them will shoot you and then let you go, but you get to decide who shoots. Person A says he will shoot you in the head. Person B says he will shoot you in the shoulder. Which do you choose?

    The more think about this the more I like it. Both persons are clearly awful and contributed to the situation. Both could offer better choices but refuse. Both are rather similar in outcomes. But one is clearly worse.

    Is it rational to choose to be shot at all? Is it rational to not choose the better of two alternatives?

    • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      More like

      One offers to shoot you in the head and kill your loved ones.

      One offers to shoot you in the head and kill a bunch of strangers.

    • djsoren19
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      This is a false dichotomy though. I’d argue the fact that “escape” doesn’t even cross your mind in this hypothetical scenario is damning.

    • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Bank robber. Get away driver.

      Would be a good analogy.

      Yes, the bank robber shot and killed the clerk.

      But they are both bank robbers

      Who is more evil? The one that does the act or the one that enables it?

    • PineRune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Then the people who claim to love you choose for you and say that getting shot in the head would be better for you. Any attempt to convince them otherwise is met with absolute disbelief.

  • wiLD0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Relative to the other fully developed countries, a mainstream Democrat is a homeopathic liberal.