• njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Do you think they’re just confused in football? Like do they not know who’s under the helmets? Cuz like 80% of the players are black.

    • Default_Defect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Remember when Capernick did that one thing that wasn’t football while on camera? The moment do anything that isn’t football it becomes woke or DEI.

    • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      It’s because they are in a performing role. They are token individuals destroying their bodies to create entertainment for the audience. It’s no different than how the south treats rodeo as some kind of beacon of equality for black individuals. It’s purely a facade to point at when denying the existence of inequality and dismissing civil rights arguments.

      It’s also directly tied to the myth of the primal black man - all brawn and no brain. A racist sex symbol.

      EDIT: typos

      EDIT 2: flipped brain and brawn, didn’t notice. Fixed.

        • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          The virile black man stereotype? Not in the US. it’s apart of the myth that black men are naturally very strong and thuggish. It’s also usually paired with the concept of them being extremely sexual (think of the giant black penis stereotype and the constant fear mongering surrounding black men ‘stealing’ all the white women). These are extremely old stereotypes that harken back to when black slaves were viewed in a fashion closer to beasts of burden than to human beings.

          EDIT: woops, saw my typo, should be fixed now.

          • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Think they mean it should be all brawn and no brain. Unless im getting that wrong. Im not from america, and im not racist. Ive just seen tv and movies.

  • jason@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It doesn’t have to be something everyone is watching… I had twitter for maybe 2 days before deleting it because somehow this fuckin Matt Walsh clown got served up to me. He was crying about how Drew Barrymore had a trans person on her show. He had like 40k likes on it. How the fuck do you make a living looking for things on tv to be mad about, and why is anyone cheering him on. That’s deranged. CHANGE THE FUCKIN CHANNEL YOU WORTHLESS STOOGE!

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      How the fuck do you make a living looking for things on tv to be mad about, and why is anyone cheering him on.

      Spoken like you must not be recovering from a childhood in a conservative home, lol.

      Finding things to be mad about, is living. It is as natural as breathing. Like breathing, you don’t notice you’re doing it unless you notice you’re doing it. It is what you think about when you plan your day and what makes you open your mouth to socialize with other people. It strongly informs your personality, your social circles, and your hobbies.

      Just be careful you don’t accidentally spend years wrenching your brain out of the negativity malaise, or you might start to do dumb things like being content with what you have, working less, wasting time on rewarding hobbies, or doing nice things for people without expecting something in return. People you aren’t even related to! Could you imagine??

      Of course up above when I say things to be “mad about,” that could also mean “afraid of or confused about, but I am tough and strong and not scared of things and don’t have wussy feminine emotions and so I’m mad rawr!”

      Edit to add: I’m being tough on conservatives because they deserve it, but being addicted to outrage (along with all your favorite psychological biases and logical fallacies) is something that everybody has to be concerned with for themselves.

      • jason@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah, I didn’t grow up in a conservative house. I think it’s one thing to be a hate filled individual who actually likes that, and a completely other thing to be a clown pushing that as your job. He brings no value into this world.

        I would say I deleted Twitter not because it served me straight stupidity. More accurately, it was how mad I got seeing his dumb take and all the idiots cheering him on. I was late to Twitter and now I understood what others had been saying. It’s designed to piss you off.

  • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Bring back calling these people weird!!

    Call them sweaty for wanting to control women’s bodies. They should be called out every time they do something or support somthing dumb.

      • petrol_sniff_king
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        They like being bad, though. Bad is like Darth Vader.

        I think we’re mature enough to recognize that weird (quirky) and weird (lingers around children) are different things.

      • dmention7@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        It’s making fun of people (generally Facebook boomers) who use the term “sweetie” condescendingly, but also can’t spell for shit.

        Or maybe the meme has evolved and I’m behind… lol

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          13 hours ago

          You are a bit, akshully /s

          The slang “sweaty” is used loosely to mean competitive or like overly anxious. Usually in response to making some inane point.

          Comes from competitive gaming where other players who try to hard (“tryhards”) making gaming not fun for normal players.

          “Too many sweaty hard lobbies made my favorite game not fun to play. How can I get good when I just get killed over and over!”

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I remember my 80+ year old grandmother getting upset that there was a shot called “Blackish” and not a show called “Whtieish” or whatever. And like… I dunno Brady Bunch, etc?

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      My mother asked me a similar question some 15 years ago. It was why we didn’t have White History Month or White Entertainment Television.

      Sadly, I didn’t have the ammo to fire back and say something like, “what about March thru January, and maybe all the rest of the television on TV since forever?”

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      did she ever think why it might be called black ish… you couldn’t translate that situation to a white family in the US.

    • Cenzorrll@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I suppose Schitt’s Creek would be the closest equivalent I can think of. If we’re talking about a family living out of their stereotypical circumstances.

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You’re giving her a lot of credit thinking she know what the show was about.

    • aeternum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      20% of people are casual racists, which means that the 80% are full time racists

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If you roll your eyes and think ‘Oh, here they go being racist again’ while the news says how what they are saying is ‘controversial’ or ‘could be seen as’ or any other dismissive phrasing then that is what the post is talking about. Society refuses to call out their racism directly, which enables it.

  • darthelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I feel like we should have just ignored these people. Deal with the ones who become problems, but otherwise not dignify their nonsense with a response. “Why is this movie so WOKE?” … “So anyway the CGI in this movie was pretty bad right? lol.”

    We spent the last 2 decades feeding the trolls. Making them think they mattered even if it was to be hated or ridiculed by their enemies.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      Couldn’t agree more. “👀 … So anyway…” has got to make people way more self conscious than any argument you can make. Arguing with these people just solidifies their position.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      We spent the last 2 decades feeding the trolls. Making them think they mattered even if it was to be hated or ridiculed by their enemies.

      YES! I have done my utmost to ignore these neanderthals my entire life because I grew up on 4chan and learned “do NOT feed the trolls” early. But apparently every news reporter and Facebook boomer since 2014 did not get the memo, and -waves at the general state of the world- here we are.

      • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        The problem with ignoring them is that it then tacitly shows acceptance of these behaviors.

        We’ve already seen this with how women have been treated. Now we’re making some progress by calling it out.

        Additionally, if it’s their goal to get attention then they will act even worse if they don’t get the attention they want.

        • SuperNovaStar
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Obviously context is important. In meatspace it’s much more important to create friction and pushback. If you’re moderating a platform it’s important to, well, moderate.

          But on social media, attention (good or bad) is currency. So ignoring can be a good strategy.

        • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Notice how I’m specifically talking about news headlines, Facebook boomers, and 4chan. All digital spaces. I never said I didn’t call this shit out IRL.

          These people got attention on social media first, and then decided to move it offline. There are whole articles about how Steve Bannon used online spaces to radicalize people because doing it irl was too tough before and during the first Trump presidency. Then newsmedia and every social platform found outrage generated clicks which generated ad revenue during the first Trump presidency, and we have now been living in this racist, fascist hellscape for a decade.