• Alpha71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    His mum could have pulled it off in a heartbeat. He would be lucky to make it out of Buckingham…

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Musk’s entire job is to keep the media focused on him and his stupidity so that we aren’t paying attention to what his useful orange idiot is doing.

    • Hellfire103@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That is an excellent point. The only snag is that I feel they aren’t quite intelligent enough to think of that. Then again, maybe that’s what they want us to think…

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Clearly the king should just ignore this nonsense …… and ban him from travelling there. Preferably the entire commonwealth. Wait. I’ll make popcorn

  • rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    When Musk controls the western world, Putin will invite him to the 23 floor for a cup of tea.

  • andxz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    My sanity isn’t ready for an reality where Elon fucking Musk is fucking shit up globally. Trump was bad enough, but this shit? This is what will eventually cause a global conflict against fucking fascists of all things.

    We already did this shit once, are we really going to do it again?

  • laserm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    When I was younger, my sister teased and provoked me (I mean she still does but much less). Every time this happened, my parents told me to just ignore her. I think media should do the same when it comes to Elon Musk, since damn, everyone who doesn’t willingly choose ignorance already sees who he is. By this you are just giving him more exposure.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s hard to say what the responsible and ethical approach is for journalists given it is newsworthy that the richest man in the world (who is also extremely influential to the highest office of the most influential country of the world) is encouraging such an extreme and unexpected regime change, but also Musk, like Trump, puts out so much noise it’s hard to predict what will actually be policy they persue vs what is just noise

    • sYnoxjj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s not how it works—actually, that’s not how anything works. It’s not about doing the right thing; it’s all about what drives the most attention, clicks, or money.

      There’s a reason every media outlet reports on every little thing the fat guy or this bozo does or says. There’s a reason you didn’t ignore this news and felt compelled to comment on it.

      It’s the same reason 99% of these commenters have no idea who someone like Demis Hassabis is, was or will be: it doesn’t drive attention.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      He’s not he-who-shall-not-be-named. Talking about him won’t make him more powerful.

  • myusernameis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Funny enough, that’s literally the plot of the play King Charles III that ran on the West End about a decade ago.

    Spoiler alert: fictional KCIII doesn’t get very far.

  • a9249@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thats one way to attract the attention of Mi6. He certainly fits the bond villain profile…

  • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    2 days ago

    There was a time when King Charles tried to overturn parliament way back in the 1600s. I forget what happened next, but I’m pretty sure it was all very civil.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ahh yes but the second Charles was successful. Largely because Parliament was going after Catholics and people didn’t like living under an Inquisition. Then James fucked it all up and everyone decided just electing better leaders was the compromise.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Oh please try Chuck. Please do. The one incontrovertible way to end the monarchy immediately would be if one of the inbred stands up and tries to exercise any real power.