Flying Squid@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoWhat's a woman?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up11.4K
arrow-up11.4KimageWhat's a woman?lemmy.worldFlying Squid@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square118fedilink
minus-squareWalk_blesseDlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoAssuming good faith on the part of those involved, I don’t see how inclusivity comes at the cost of effectiveness. Would you care to elaborate?
minus-squaregimsy@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoAssuming good faith, that’s a hell of an assumption
minus-squareBgugi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoAssuming I’m a bicycle, I’d have wheels. Protections presuppose bad faith.
minus-squareWalk_blesseDlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoWhat protections? Give me some concrete examples of what you’re talking about here.
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoGendered bathrooms? It certainly does not require a lot of good faith to come up with this example.
minus-squareWalk_blesseDlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoThat’s a terrible example. Gendered bathrooms would still fulfil their function if anybody could use them regardless of gender, causing no measurable harm to anyone.
Assuming good faith on the part of those involved, I don’t see how inclusivity comes at the cost of effectiveness. Would you care to elaborate?
Assuming good faith, that’s a hell of an assumption
Assuming I’m a bicycle, I’d have wheels.
Protections presuppose bad faith.
What protections? Give me some concrete examples of what you’re talking about here.
Gendered bathrooms? It certainly does not require a lot of good faith to come up with this example.
That’s a terrible example. Gendered bathrooms would still fulfil their function if anybody could use them regardless of gender, causing no measurable harm to anyone.