Flying Squid@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoWhat's a woman?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up11.43K
arrow-up11.43KimageWhat's a woman?lemmy.worldFlying Squid@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square119fedilink
minus-squareWalk_blesseDlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoAssuming good faith on the part of those involved, I don’t see how inclusivity comes at the cost of effectiveness. Would you care to elaborate?
minus-squaregimsy@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoAssuming good faith, that’s a hell of an assumption
minus-squareBgugi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoAssuming I’m a bicycle, I’d have wheels. Protections presuppose bad faith.
minus-squareWalk_blesseDlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoWhat protections? Give me some concrete examples of what you’re talking about here.
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoGendered bathrooms? It certainly does not require a lot of good faith to come up with this example.
minus-squareWalk_blesseDlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoThat’s a terrible example. Gendered bathrooms would still fulfil their function if anybody could use them regardless of gender, causing no measurable harm to anyone.
Assuming good faith on the part of those involved, I don’t see how inclusivity comes at the cost of effectiveness. Would you care to elaborate?
Assuming good faith, that’s a hell of an assumption
Assuming I’m a bicycle, I’d have wheels.
Protections presuppose bad faith.
What protections? Give me some concrete examples of what you’re talking about here.
Gendered bathrooms? It certainly does not require a lot of good faith to come up with this example.
That’s a terrible example. Gendered bathrooms would still fulfil their function if anybody could use them regardless of gender, causing no measurable harm to anyone.