• shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      Go read The Grapes of Wrath and The Concrete Jungle. Get back to me on today’s unrelenting misery.

      • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        86
        ·
        1 month ago

        One kind of misery does not negate the existence of other kinds of misery. The pain of living through the Great Depression is different from the pain of seeing reality eroded away into propaganda for the highest bidders, but it doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be fighting to end misery.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        There are more human slaves alive on Earth today than at any previous point in history.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          I doubt it. The Roman Empire alone at its height had a population of 50-90 million with roughly a quarter of that enslaved.

          Even with extremely inclusive definitions of slavery (which are also not included in the classical count) the modern estimates of the total number of slaves is like 40-50 million. It’s too many, obviously, but classical period Europe, Africa, and Asia alone would crush those numbers, and the 'New World" didn’t appear out of nowhere when Columbus stumbled into it.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          There are more people alive today then any other point in human history. Do you have slaves per capita?

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just read the plot of grapes of wrath, uhhh, you do understand that the story is about late stage capitalism right? And the person you were responding to is saying how we live in similar times right?

        Its like someone saying poison can kill you and you respond with: see this story about how bad lots of poison is… yeah… that’s the point.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Apt metaphor of our times.

    Greenwashing, social media highlight reels, worship of the affluent, grind culture, etc.

    Putting a fake, stepford face to obfuscate the horrors we refuse to address, using unethical(theft) technology being shoved down our throats for profit no less.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was just reminded of this starting up the Tomb Raider I-III trilogy.

      Just like Looney Tunes, they added a disclaimer; paraphrased “This rerelease depicts certain cultures in a light we do not agree with - we’ve preserved the work to avoid pretending this never happened”

      On a more minor note, I’m very sick of the TikTok trend of censoring words like “kill” into “unalive”. It has even made it hard for victims to talk about brutal subjects. It’ll happen to you, you just aren’t allowed to talk about it because that might upset people.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        That was done specifically to limit police video distributions, YouTube doesn’t allow references to violence unless a large mainstream news network posts it.

        They’re starting to even remove court cases that are on touchy subjects.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        On a more minor note, I’m very sick of the TikTok trend of censoring words like “kill” into “unalive”.

        I’ve only seen that on Youtube.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Gotta add a splash of sex. Unbutton a couple more on that shirt and enhance the pic with tasteful cleavage, so we can ignore the surroundings.

  • jelloeater - Ops Mgr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t know whether to feel angry or sad looking at this but it definitely makes me feel uncomfortable and gross that’s for sure. It’s like someone making you your favorite dish for dinner and then just covering it in jello.

  • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 month ago

    Am I the only one who would find the woman at the left more attractive?

    The right just looks like plastic to me, same with all of these instagram influencer ladies who have more plastic surgeries than I have fingers.

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That’s the joke.

      This is a parody of twitter posts made by actual “anti DEI/woke” dipshits. The format is identical to their posts “fixing” modern female video game characters that don’t look like sex dolls.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Woke” originally meant “aware of and well-informed about systemic social issues affecting everyday people”. Conservatives have co-opted this word and use it to describe anything associated with leftism or social liberalism. It is intended to be negative in that context.

      “DEI” stands for “diversity, equity, and inclusion”. It refers to policies that intentionally include people of diverse or minority backgrounds in the context of employment or political appointment. Conservatives use it to describe (in their view) hiring practices that select less-qualified candidates of these backgrounds against the favour of those who may be more qualified. In that usage, a “DEI hire” or “diversity hire” is a person hired or appointed solely on the basis of their race, gender, or some other status as a minority even though they are not qualified for the role.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        DEI hire is actually supposed to be “if you have a choice between two candidates who are equally qualified, you choose the one which adds diversity to your team”. There’s nothing in DEI hire about choosing the less qualified person. If anything, from what I’ve seen people who are non-white usually have more degrees and qualifications than their white colleagues. I mean, look at Kamala Harris vs. Donald Trump right now…

        • BluesF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s true in reality, but in the minds of those who use it to diminish people, the implication is that race was the deciding factor - because of course, to them, only whites are competent, so there’s no other reason anyone else could have been chosen.

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I was once heard of a team where two equally, incredibly talented candidates were options. One of them had the same name as two other people on the team so they picked the other guy. Can’t have three John’s ya know?

          (The name wasn’t John, it was a fairly uncommon name, which made it waaaaay funnier)

          In the most technical sense, that was DEI hire.

  • prole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Man, Stalin would have loved this tech… Even with just film, the USSR was able to make some impressive photo edits to remove politicians that Stalin had “purged,” from previous photographs.

    Because I guess that means they never existed?

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s making fun of gamers. “Putting females in a game that aren’t huge breasted fan service is woke”.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        "Putting females in a game that aren’t huge breasted fan service anyone that isn’t a hot white straight female or masculine straight male in a game is woke”

        It’s so fucking disgusting reading comments in Steam “discussions” lately…

        :(

        • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I came across a facebook post criticizing the character model of Angela from the new Silent Hill 2 Remake. Thousands of people liked the post which called the model of the remake ugly and less feminine. The character is a teenager and victim of sexual assault…

  • BluesF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Omg can people start doing this to like, random men? Politicians? Actors? Scientists? Please 😂