There are 1.65 trillion barrels of proven oil reserves in the world as of 2016.

The world has proven reserves equivalent to 46.6 times its annual consumption levels. This means it has about 47 years of oil left (at current consumption levels and excluding unproven reserves).

This means that the oil is going to run out in our lifetime

Source/more reading: https://www.worldometers.info/oil/

Update: It is infact not true (or just partially true), because it only considers already known oil reserves that can be pumped out with current technology.

There is more oil that can potentially be used as technology and infrastructure advances, so the estimate of 50 years is wrong.

For the correction thanks to Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win (their original comment)

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Honestly we’ve known peak oil would occur in our lives for several decades. Not that you could tell by any project to prepare for such an event.

  • helloworld55@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I was curious how best to cut down on our usage, if we’d be aggressive, how long we could make our oil last.

    From the EPA, seems the like roughly 40% of an oil barrel ends up being used to create gasoline source. The transportation sector accounts to 2/3 of our total oil consumption. In the transportation sector, roughly 54% of energy is used just for passenger cars. source

    If everyone in the world stopped driving gasoline cars and switched to a 100% renewable option, we would only cut our oil production by about 36%. That changes the timeline from 50 years to 78 years.

    Pretty saddening to think about. Hopefully some technology improvements for oil recycling come around quickly

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Probably because of all the dipshits in this thread specifically, acting like we don’t need to stop extracting and using oil.

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This thread is filled with people who don’t grasp what a finite resource is. Saying “I remember hearing that x years ago”. Sure there’s probably more it there somewhere, but we don’t need to have to the finish on this. There are are kids who are going to grow up, people who aren’t born yet. Hell, at current rates, we might fuck up things with climate change. Which, even more reason to use less.

    Call me selfish, but I want my nieces and nephews, to be able to grow up into a prosperous world and not some weird dystopian hellscape.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I think our point is that we don’t know if this is a good prediction or not. They both keeps crying wolf.

      We’re not cheering for it, we’re just skeptical.

      • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Skeptical of what? That it’s finite? Or how much is left? Or that climate change is real?

        Because I’m definitely seeing people who think we have unlimited oil, that there’s always going to be more, and that climate change is not only a hoax but isn’t caused by humans at all. Some of those folks are in this thread, some of those folks I know in real life.

  • atempuser23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    15 hours ago

    At the current rate of oil consumption there are only 15 years left in the world. So it’s fine.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    18 hours ago

    “Peak Oil” they used to call it. Lots written about to collapse of everything after Peak Oil. Been predicted since at least 1970’s.

    Now we need to run out for our own good.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Peak oil was about conventional oil. Had we not discovered other sources and methods for extraction then we likely would have run out. And running out isn’t accurate, it’s just that oil becomes harder to extract and thus too expensive for regular uses.

      There are many things that were predicted as a collapse factor that we then innovated solutions to break past those barriers. We’re too smart for our own good, because each time we find new ways to keep going we make things worse and get ourselves even more into a dead end. When we do “run out” of oil of any type, which will happen at the growing rate we use it up, will we be smart again and find replacements for all the things petroleum is used for (not just fuel)? One important one being fertilizer to make food grow in our otherwise barren soils. Fun fact: people need to eat to live. Most people in the world, especially the western world, exists and survive because of food thanks to oil.

      Lastly, we would have done so much better post-collapse if things had happened naturally with a smaller population and less damage to the environment. The higher you fall, the more it will hurt, and we’re damn high now compared to the mid/late 20th century.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Peak oil was about conventional oil. Had we not discovered other sources and methods for extraction then we likely would have run out. And running out isn’t accurate, it’s just that oil becomes harder to extract and thus too expensive for regular uses.

        In other words, we did hit Peak Oil and that’s what caused the development of things like fracking, oil sands, and deep ocean drilling.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeah, not trying to poke holes, but I was hearing “less than 50 years left” when I was in school in the 2000s. I do remember seeing a post here and there about new oil reservoirs being discovered but never any follow up. So I suppose that could be stretching things out. But oil use certainly hasn’t decreased in the last 25 years.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    15 hours ago

    “The report says we can release 565 more gigatons of co2 without the effects being calamitous.” “It says we can only release 565 gigabytes.” “So what if we only release 564?” “Well, then we would have a reasonable shot at some form of dystopian post-apocalyptic life, but the carbon dioxide in the oil that we’ve already leased is 2795 gigatons so…”

    The Newsroom climate change scene

    Point being, we already have oil we haven’t burned yet that will shoot us far past any limits we’ve pretended we’ll adhere to, and yet we’re still looking for more oil to dig up. How can this end well?

  • johsny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This means that the oil is going to run out in our lifetime.

    Well, not in mine. So good luck with that!

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’ll be 91. I’m sure I’ll have bigger problems by that point.

    …such as having been dead for the past 49 years!

    • UltraHamster64@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No, I think quite the opposite. I learned this recently and I was quite surprised no one ever uses this as one of the arguments for renewable sources of energy.

      Because why invest in an industry that is basically declining and wouldn’t be around after 50-60 years.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        People have been using this as an argument for renewables since what? The 70s oil crisis? As new ways to access hydrocarbons got discovered the horrified realization was that there are plenty of reasons to bail on those faster than they run out, unfortunately. The issue isn’t that we’ll run out, it’s the amount of damage we’ll cause until that point.

        And also, it’ll take much longer to run out, but others have mentioned that already.

        This thread is interesting to me mostly as a periodic reminder that culture wars have shorter memories than one would think. People forget hotly contested issues and the public opinion battle lines around them at a horrifying pace. You’d think it has to do with old people dying and new people growing up, but it’s a lot faster than that.

      • troed@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It’s because it isn’t true. We don’t go looking unless it’s needed.