• linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe we’re thinking about this wrong. Maybe we should all start running plugins that just load whatever ads that show up in the background hundreds of times without showing them to us. Every viewer is thousands upon thousands of impressions and click through rates become absolutely miserable. We can make the ads worthless or maybe even make them cost a significant amount of money to host.

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I had an add blocker on phone thats worked that way (AdAway). It would just redirect adds into some folder and apps would be satisfied.

      • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s mildly effective in the sense that it will decimate click-through rates, but if enough people did it, they would start filtering by IP, and you’d need to change how many ads it clicks on so it looks more human.

        It also still gives advertisers your data, since it still has to load the ads on your system to click them, so it’s not as privacy-preserving as a full-on adblocker that outright blocks every advertisement and tracker related network request in the first place.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yeah, I don’t want to use it because I don’t want them to get some weird over fitted model of my behavior.

    • UpperBroccoli
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Have you looked at the market share of Firefox lately? Why even waste time on that?

      • William@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Because this is likely to drive a lot of people to try switching. And they’re the type of people who try to convince other people to switch, too. Techies, etc.

        When forced with trying to keep family safe from abusive and/or manipulative ads, this is a pretty hot topic. Plenty of people tell their family what browser to use and even set it up for them with ad blockers, etc.

        I’ve recently had some experiences that tell me my parents are at a vulnerable age and can’t fully protect themselves, so it’s pretty important to have control of this.

    • endofline@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      So you will need to have a backup browser to use only Google services and everything but Google search blocked in ff

      • Its not google services i worry about ive pretty much degoogled everything i can. Its the google bits so deeply embedded into almost every website across the internet. If they implemented some tpm bs into chrome that somehow Verity’s itself with tpm and google servers before it loads anything then that instantly makes a majority of websites juat not work on ff with no fixes backdoors or bypasses. They will try, we have little hope in stopping it, and most people wont even notice let alone give a fuck.

  • fluckx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    2 days ago

    What could go wrong when you let an ad company dictate the browser standards/rules.

    I know we have Firefox and some forks like librewolf, but percentage wise it feels like a lost battle ( even if I am on Firefox ).

    If only people switched en masse to Firefox for the ad blocker. Wouldn’t that be something… One big collective FU to Google.

    Oh well. One can dream I guess.

    • SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      The average Joe or Jane have no idea about ad blocking possibilities. They think ads are just the normal price you pay for surfing the web.

      I have even shown people the difference between their browsing experience and mine, and still they can’t be arsed to install an ad-blocker.

      But then again, they use tiktok and Instagram and all the other brain-numbing shit out there.

      • xavier666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        They think ads are just the normal price you pay for surfing part of the web

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I personally wouldn’t mind ads, if they weren’t too obtuse and/or malware ridden.

        I often turn off the adblocker for independent news sites, as theirs are less obtuse and are vetted better than just running an AI to detect nudity and/or slurs.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          By all means bring back the banner and side ads that are just one banner and a couple of side ads. Breaking every paragraph up by two more ads is just a miserable experience. Have you tried to look up a recipe lately? Trying to find a recipe without an ad blocker pisses me off and off that I just give up on the recipe. Even though I know it’s on the page, between the 5,000 word essay trying to convey their nostalgia for the recipe and the 27 different ads that break that 5,000 word essay into 25 pages, I’d rather DDOS them then get the recipe from them.

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    2 days ago

    We’ve known this was coming for a while now . . . but I suppose not everyone reads tech news.

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    2 days ago

    I used to recommend uBlock as a no-brainer, now folks really need to change towards a better browser.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 days ago

      Or get network wide blocking. Doesn’t prevent everything but it does prevent most ads. Makes the internet tolerable at least.

              • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 days ago

                Wouldn’t a company VPN bypass all that even though you are using your own internet connection to connect to the outside world?

                • kill_dash_nine@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Typically yes, assuming that the company VPN sets DNS to a set of company DNS servers. That is how my company’s works and several others I’ve worked for in the past.

                • kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Maybe, I guess I don’t know enough to answer that. I do know that being on a company VPN isn’t always a requirement, though.

                  Either way, I’m not trying to argue for one approach to ad blocking over another as a one-size-fits-all solution, I just wanted to point out that it’s possible to have more control over the network than the computer in some cases.

          • qprimed@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            sadly, agreed. mindshare leads to adoption, tho - so putting Firefox in front of more faces is always a positive. after all, its how google dominates.

          • shininghero@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Depends on how lax the IT department is when it comes to random executables. I was able to move the firefox installer to the appdata root, and run a non-admin install to my user profile.

      • datendefekt@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Pihole is good for a private network, but you can forget it in a work setting, especially corporate networks.

      • rickdg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Something like NextDNS as a no-brainer? It works but hits the limit of the free tier if people use it beyond their phone.

        • nfh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          PiHole and a TailScale exit node so you can use it for DNS whether or not you’re on your home network.

          • Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Or a variation of this is TailScale configured to use NextDNS and a TS exit node. That’s for anyone who doesn’t want to maintain a PiHole. I’ve done both. Personal choice.

      • abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I recommended pihole to my senior webdeveloper. She didn’t know about it and was blown away by the concept. She installed it immediately and is now living happily ad free.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hoping that Vivaldi is going to hold off somehow - perhaps with their built-in ad blocker. And before you say “switch to Firefox”, I’ll say I’m not gonna, at least not until I see native mouse gestures implemented and working everywhere.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Fair enough. All I’m saying is that mouse gestures are so much ingrained in my muscle memory that their absence in native capacity (and reliance on extensions for that) is a show-stopper for me.

        • downhomechunk [chicago]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I get it. Date your distro, marry your browser.

          I miss the level of customization you could do in Vivaldi, down to minute details. But I don’t miss it enough to put up with ads and tracking nonsense.

          I started on Firefox back when it was a beta called Phoenix. I eventually moved to chromium based browsers like the rest of the world, but now I’m back. I’ve come full circle!