• warbond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    245
    ·
    23 days ago

    Looks like they backed over it, laying the pole down, then drove forward, poking the pole through the undercarriage and standing it back up.

    • Sumocat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      210
      ·
      23 days ago

      No, that bollard didn’t budge. She backed into it fast enough to shoot the SUV straight up the bollard, it clears the bumper, and BAM! — the SUV dropped down on the bollard. That bumper should have crumpled, but it was rugged and rounded enough to deflect the impact downward or, equal and opposite reaction, send the vehicle upward. Traffic bollards are still tough enough to stand up to SUVs, but not tall enough to be seen by the drivers.

      • ganksy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        91
        ·
        23 days ago

        This is the right answer. Bollards made of concrete and steel are designed to stop cars. There is no elasticity in that bollard. If she bent it, it would’ve stayed bent.

        • dmention7@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          Check the bottom of the bollard, it looks visible damaged where it meets the ground, like it had bent backwards towards the camera.

          I think the OP is right. It wouldn’t need elasticity; it got bent down just far enough for the back end of the car to ride up on it, then when they pulled forward it dragged the bollard upright, at which point it punched through the floor.

          My guess is the metal had begun to rust where it meets the ground, and then some freeze thaw cycles crumbled the concrete, leaving it weak right where it meets the ground.

          • punkfungus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            23 days ago

            Yeah there’s not nearly enough damage to the back of the car for it to have hit so hard as to launch it into the air. Plus you can see yellow paint on the ground where the bollard was clearly laid over. OP is right.

            • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              22 days ago

              Not just the ground, it’s also on the bumper at the point of impact. You can see the imprint it left when it was slanted at like 45 degrees.

          • ganksy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            23 days ago

            The thing is it ended up almost perpendicular to the ground. No bend at all. To have the car pull forward and bend it back that way is a heck of an ask.

            • genuineparts@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              22 days ago

              If you look closesly, it’s a concrete filled pole and the ground seems disturbed. So she didn’t bend it. She ripped it out of the ground and when driving forward it dipped back into it’s hole and puncutured the underfloor.

    • qooqie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Oh good eye, I think you’re right especially from the paint on the bumper

      • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        23 days ago

        So reversing the car should flatten the ballard again and get the car free? Or maybe the ballard only went to an acute angle and lifted the car up till the ballard poked through a weak point in the frame. Either way she’s reversed into it at a decent speed…and then completed her yoga class before calling for help.

        • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 days ago

          I mean… Theoretically if she had a strong enough drive train, and the car was overall very heavy, she could absolutely back up again.

          However, given the height of the bollard vs the ground clearance of the undercarriage, I believe it would pinch the bumper downward and possibly prevent the car from going anywhere. It depends on how strong the bumper materials are, and if anything from the frame is in the way.

          Source: my ass, but it’s my best guess based on studying more crashes than I care to count.

          • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 days ago

            Your ass is probably correct.

            Also the bollard was initially pushed down by the rigid frame of the car. Now it is inside the boot. The inside of the boot will be pushing against it.

            Now they’re going to call roadside rescue and going to have to explain how they need a crane rather than a tow truck.

            • Fermion@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              23 days ago

              The bollard needs to be replaced at this point. May as well just cut it off. Hiring a crane is unnecessary.

    • GunValkyrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      23 days ago

      I believe you are right except I don’t think the pole moved at all. The ground seems in disturbed. And typically they are made to withstand being hit by a car. So more likely they backed up so fast that it sent the rear up on top of the pole and then just came crashing down on it.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 days ago

      Yup. That’s the only way this could have worked. Unless the car was jumped off a ramp first, Knight Rider style.

      As @qooqie pointed out, the paint transfer on the bumper supports your theory.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      Thank you for posting this. Until I read your summary, I thought it was a yoga mat that had somehow escaped from inside the trunk and was completely flummoxed.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    23 days ago

    I once had the pleasure of witnessing someone flood their engine in a perfectly dry parking lot.

    They drove over a curb and fire hydrant. The curb popped them up enough to land their engine compartment firmly onto the hydrant.

    It’s pretty amazing how much air you can catch from even small obstacles.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    23 days ago

    Remember, when you hear a crunch of your car hitting something just double down and add more throttle. Only a pussy would stop and asses the situation.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    His wife had Frank pick her up cause she couldn’t resist backing up on that long, hard pole.

  • MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    23 days ago

    My ex-wife regularly damaged my truck. My favorite was when she managed to drive it onto a tree stump such that it was resting on the axle with only two wheels contacting the ground.

    At least I had it better than this guy.

  • That one’s a little taller, but still; I turned while backing out into one of these concrete barriers that was impossible to see from within the car because it was only 2 or 3 ft. tall. Crushed the bumper in my case, and it was my fault, but still: fuck the people who make these difficult-to-see barriers in parking areas.

  • IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    23 days ago

    I’m going to guess she ran it over backing up and then when the car was over the pole, she drove forward and the pole went straight up and went through the trunk flooring.

    Anyone have any thoughts?

    • finkrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      22 days ago

      Assuming this isn’t AI gen or Photoshop, probably backed up, reached the bollard, kept reversing forcing the car to go up because it can’t go back, eventually got car over, bollard pierces car bottom as the car frame gets past and it’s weight forces it down.

      Stupidity in short, maybe intentional. I don’t believe the story. I don’t know if I even believe the photo.

      • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        22 days ago

        Either AI has gotten better, the person who photoshopped it was really dedicated, or based on the dent and paint transfer on the back the person backed up fast and rode the post up then dropped down on top of it.

        A different person posted that they found this image(reverse search) attached to a number of tweets this month. So the caption is 100% fake

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 days ago

        I’d guess they had found a pole that had its top sawed off by somebody who wanted access, and got the idea for this post, arranging it to make the apparent protrusion without photo editing.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 days ago

      Probably just reverse too quickly and the hitboxes merged. I’ve had a similar experience with swing sets.

    • AscendantSquid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 days ago

      I kinda figure that the pole isn’t secure in the ground, like whoever installed it did it poorly and not deep enough into the ground. When you back up into it, it begins to tip over until you have the top under the car. When you try going forward, it rights itself. I’ve seen something similar with different kinds of poles and when they are upright, they look completely fine.

      I figure that if you backed up with enough force to drive up the pole, the bumper would be more damaged.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    23 days ago

    I did something similar one time. I was maneuvering around a cleared lot in a work truck and I drove over a tree trunk that was hidden by tall grass. The bumper slid up over the stump and then dropped down on the other side, trapping the truck. Had a hell of a time getting the truck jacked up high enough to get it back over.

    • netvor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      To me it feels fake.

      Especially the description sounds like a teenager is trying to build up tension in a story. Real people don’t talk like that.

      To be honest, the text somehow manages to even more forced and photoshopped than the actual photo (which probably is shopped as well.)

      (Edit: I realized I have red shift enabled on my screen so I’m probably totally unfair to the photo.)

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        there’s yellow paint and an indent on the back of the car, in the path of the bollard, which looks quite real to me and feels like a lot of effort to go into for an internet post

        edit: now that i think about it some more, and look closer, i’m gonna wager that they did really hit the bollard and maybe fucked up the car, but they then posed things to fake the bollard going through the car. It’s convenient how the first photo hides the base of the bollard and the area where it would pierce the car, and the second one could quite easily be two separate photos with the middle of the bollard erased to match the outline of the car’s rear.

        • lunarul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 days ago

          That would be a lot of effort for a very high quality fake. In both pictures you can see the whole bottom of the trunk was raised up by the bollard poking through.

      • Bobmighty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 days ago

        The photo could be real. I’ve seen things like that in person. The story is dumb teenage bullshit like you say though.

    • Annoyed_🦀 🏅@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Reverse and hit the bollard, bending it, the bollard goes under the car and the owner realise the fuckup and try to go forward, the bollard that stuck under the car is now hooked and then bend upward, piercing the car.

      Looking at the second picture, the base of the bollard is rusted and bended and seems hollow, and the plastic part of the car is warped. There’s a bend mark on the bumper, she must’ve force it through even though the car doesn’t seems to move. Average SUV driver if you ask me.