You would still have the same age, gender, personality, skin color, etc. and you would be able to speak at least one local language and would know basic information of the era and place. Your family, social standing, and such would be randomly picked.

  • @mke_geek@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    67 months ago

    Back in time if you’re gay? Or trans? Or a woman? Or a person of color?

    No thanks.

    • @pruneaue
      link
      127 months ago

      If you go further back in time you can get back to fairly queer friendly societies

    • magnetosphere
      link
      fedilink
      107 months ago

      Gay? Ancient Greece. Person of color? Just pick someplace that won’t have significant contact with different races during your lifetime.

    • Greg Clarke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      97 months ago

      The way your society currently discriminates and segments humans is not universal

      • MudMan
        link
        fedilink
        77 months ago

        Right?

        We’re going on a tangent here, but I feel like Western progressives, particularly with anglo backgrounds, tend to think the entire world runs by their parameters and always has. There is nothing intrinsic to the current kinds of bigotry in their societies. It’s pretty arbitrary and specific, in fact.

        • livus
          link
          fedilink
          47 months ago

          @MudMan yeah this. Threads like this make me really wish more non-western ancient history was taught in schools.

          • magnetosphere
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            As an American, I wholeheartedly agree. I often wish I had a sturdier foundation in world history.

          • @MrsDoyle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            37 months ago

            Especially ancient Africa! Look up Mansa Musa, king of Mali. Carthage too. Zimbabwe. Benin. Egypt too, it’s in Africa.