You would still have the same age, gender, personality, skin color, etc. and you would be able to speak at least one local language and would know basic information of the era and place. Your family, social standing, and such would be randomly picked.

  • @bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    517 months ago

    New Zealand 800 years ago. The rest of the question doesn’t matter because there were no other humans there.

    • @IIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      67 months ago

      That means you would doom yourself to die alone…

      Or you have to spend your whole life building a boat, collecting food and being able to navigate, just to rejoin civilisation

    • BlueÆther
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      As I’m from NZ atm I would choose here about 800 years ago as well - 800 years ago is about when the first Maori arrived - give or take a few

    • @MrsDoyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      With my luck I’d die of a katipo spider bite in the first month lol. Also, I’m minded of the scene in the film Boy, where said boy is cooking tea for the family. “Ah no, not crayfish again!” whines his sister. (Though I can’t imagine getting sick of crayfish.) Ask yourself why the Māori started eating tītī/muttonbird…. that smacks of desperation. Pack a few kūmara in your bag, maybe an axe and a box of matches?

  • FoundTheVegan
    link
    fedilink
    47
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Dec 31st 1949.

    I’m a queer woman, so these sort of time travel questions boil down to preserving as many rights as I can.

    • timicin
      link
      fedilink
      197 months ago

      as a queer brown man; i don’t want to be anywhere at all.

      why 1949 and where?

      • livus
        link
        fedilink
        187 months ago

        You would have been just fine in, say, North or East Africa a few hundred years ago.

        I think they picked 49 because it’s as modern as they could get within OP’s parameters.

    • @zero_gravitas@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      77 months ago

      Where, the U.S.? Seems like there’s gotta be other times and places that were more woman- and queer-friendly, right?

      • Seraph
        link
        fedilink
        67 months ago

        You’d think places like San Francisco would be better, but 20 years later the Stone Wall riots happened. It was pretty rough all around to be gay in that time, though I’m sure some places were worse than others.

        • timicin
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          fwiw: gay nightlife in san francisco was at its zenith in the 50’s & 60’s .

          the san francisco we have today is a tiny dim more conservative ember of what it was back then.

      • @EmptyMusic
        link
        237 months ago

        Its as close as possible to now before the 50s

        • @EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted
          link
          17 months ago

          Fair enough, though at that point you’d probably get better results if you went further back. The 50s were…really bad.

          • @EmptyMusic
            link
            27 months ago

            To be entirely fair I’d probably just ⚡ 🧑🏿‍🦱 ⚡ myself either way. Not willing to try and survive without my meds.

      • @hungryphrogOP
        link
        37 months ago

        Rome would kinda suck for a woman, especially a queer one.

  • guyrocket
    link
    fedilink
    287 months ago

    Given that there were 2 world wars in the early 1900s and that I like tech in general I would also choose 12/31/1949. At least I might have a PC sometime in my lifetime and I’d probably live to use it and not be a corpse on some beach somewhere.

  • @esc27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    247 months ago

    Lincoln’s booth in Ford’s theater on the night of the assassination right before it happens. Saving the president will immediately give me some credibility and influence, and it could improve reconstruction of the south to an extent that positively impacts modern America.

  • MudMan
    link
    fedilink
    187 months ago

    I mean, tune it just right and you can get the Industrial Revolution started a couple millenia early and maybe bypass the whole colonialism nonsense. Middle ages is too late, too much theocracy. Common knowledge gets you in grecorroman spaces, but maybe you can overshoot a touch and get some nice Phoenician traders to bankroll your plan to mass produce bycicles or Ikea-style furniture and ship it all over the Mediterranean.

    Just… hope you stay healthy or that the rules let you pack a bunch of antibiotics. Or maybe learn a bunch of modern medicine before you go. Maybe prioritize the whole “discovering penicillin” thing when you get there.

    • livus
      link
      fedilink
      107 months ago

      Problem with that plan is you don’t know if you will be a slave.

      • MudMan
        link
        fedilink
        77 months ago

        Not necessarily insurmountable, but still a good point.

        You may still have an easier time getting things up and running as a slave in antiquity than as a serf in the Middle Ages, depending on where you end up. Pretty sure you’d have a better shot as a slave in antiquity than in the US or other colonial areas, both because colonialism reeeeally sucked and because you’d have relatively more valuable skills.

        • livus
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          @MudMan I think the odds are much better if you’re a non-chattel kind of slave, for sure.

          • MudMan
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Don’t get me wrong, you could also just materialize chained up to the bottom of a mine or in the middle of a war campaign lasting 40% of your lifespan and die in a week.

            It’s just since the premise doesn’t say you get to refuse at least this way you’d have a good chance at just absolutely smashing it and maybe bypassing some of the real nasty stuff on the way to technological advancement.

            • livus
              link
              fedilink
              27 months ago

              @MudMan totally. Nowhere’s completely safe. This kind of thought experiment is always going to be a numbers game.

    • @LeafOnTheWind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      Pretty sure they would have just done colonialism harder and faster if you tried to get the industrial revolution going sooner.

      • MudMan
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        Would you? I think that’s the most interesting question in this hypothetical. Would dropping future tech knowledge in a different context just clone cultural and political progression or change course?

        I think assuming industrial revolution inevitably leads to colonialism, then imperialism lets actual colonial powers off the hook. I mean, never mind that you’d probably be able to explain inflation to people and skip past some of the straight-up self-defeating resource chases, arguably colonialism is very dependent on European culture being very specifically theocratic and self-absorbed. Especially if you step in prior to the Middle Ages. Roman expansion had slavery as a common law figure, like everybody else at the time, but their incorporation of other territories was extremely not based on colonial principles, even in parts of Africa that would then be under straight-up colonial rule. Would having muskets and combustion engines have changed that? I’m not sure.

    • @Phantom_Engineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      Thing is, industrial revolution bleeds into colonialism. Sure, there was colonialism before industrialization, and colonialism would look very different in a time before nation-states as we know them today, but those resources will have to come from somewhere.

      Metallurgy is always where they get you on these things. You can bring stuff like division of labor, assembly lines, and replaceable parts back in time pretty easily, but good luck getting aluminum for your bicycles in any kind of quantity. Not sure how well a bronze bicycle would work, but I bet it could be done.

      • MudMan
        link
        fedilink
        47 months ago

        A steel bycicle will surely work.

        The problem with all of it is going to be scale. I think you’re right in that you think you can just jump into the technology bit in these Yankee in King’s Arthur’s Court scenarios and instead you’d probably get stuck trying to revolutionize mining and material science and then die from an ingrown toenail.

        Which, to his credit, Twain absolutely covers when he does the thought experiment. I’m constantly impressed that his take was “you’d cherry pick the people that are open minded enough and spend the rest of your life trying to set up an education system only to be chased away regardless because politics is a bitch”.

        That’s still probably the right answer.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    157 months ago

    The location, geography and placement is randomly picked?

    Then like the other guy said December 31, 1949 11:59 pm

    To be born before this time randomly anywhere in the world means that there is a high chance you’d be dropped into an impoverished hell hole with nothing, no chance and no help … God help you if you are female.

    • @navigatron@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      I have a whole rant on this topic, but the short version:

      It’s dentists.

      The gnarliest mountain man, who hunts bears with his bear hands, can be brought to his knees with a toothache. The toothache never sleeps, can’t be fought, and always eventually wins. Even basic dentistry is life saving - even another human with a pair of pliers and some moonshine - but I’d much rather have novocaine.

      • IninewCrow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        Dental problems a hundred years ago were not as problematic as we think. I’m Indigenous Canadian and my parents were born and raised in the bush and judging from family photos I’ve seen from a hundred years ago … most people had decent teeth. I have photos of my grandmothers parents who must have been in the 60s or 70s and they all had full teeth, probably not the best but they had obvious white teeth.

        Cavities and tooth problems are a modern problem from wealth … we eat too much starch and sugar and generally just eat way too much of everything. Before the modern era, up to about the mid 1800s, the average person ate about five pounds of refined sugar a year - today the average person consumes about 100 lbs of sugar a year. … and those are the averages! Back a hundred years ago, you were wealthy if you could get sugar … most people just couldn’t afford to eat it … most people couldn’t afford to eat! And they ate more simple diets and less often.

        The biggest fear I have about going back to the past is just getting a flesh wound, a hang nail or a scratch that could fester into an infection and either take a limb or kill me.

        • sethboy66
          link
          fedilink
          67 months ago

          Dental problems aren’t about them looking good; teeth used to kill. Dental disease used to be the 5th leading cause of death. Your great-grandparents aren’t the best bar for dentistry in the past as modern dentistry began in the 18th century.

  • TheaoneAndOnly27
    link
    fedilink
    157 months ago

    The surgery that kept me alive at birth wasn’t invented until the late '80s. So I guess I would just be fucked no matter what. So put me wherever they want, any time before 1950 is going to suck ass for me.

    Now assuming that part of my time travel comes with being able to fix my heart stuff. I would like to be born in the early 1900s. I can’t think of a single time where I’m not going to fight both war and awfulness in the general world. But at least then I could be around for some cool developments.

    • @DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      You’ll be right - OP said your age and a bunch of other things would be preserved. You won’t be born there - just transported to the chosen time, to spend the rest of your days.

  • Icalasari
    link
    fedilink
    147 months ago

    About 4 to 6 million years ago. Choosing biological history of humans, see what I can mess up when humans first started

  • @Quik@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    1940, as there are crazy things that will be going on in the world of computer science (and science in general) over the course of the next few decades and that would be really cool to experience. Kind of sad though to not be alive once we achieve human-level artificial intelligence, would be interested in seeing how that will turn out. I would probably chose America, as I wouldn’t want to spend WW2 in Germany where I live in the present.

    Alternatively I think I would very much enjoy visiting Ancient Greek, although I’m not too sure when would be the best time for that; maybe at the peak of Athen.

  • @LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    If I could speak the local language and know basic information about the era and place, I would join the Navajo people from whence 12.5% of my DNA originated because I identify with that the most, it’s strong in me. I feel like a fish out of water currently. I would be so happy with them. In fact I was recently in Arizona and I wanted so much to join the Navajos but I know it doesn’t work that way. You have to be born in there in order to assimilate.

    And I’d choose a point in history long before they were conquered by Europeans. I don’t want to deal with any of that traumatic massacre bullshit.

    • @dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      Damn, I’m sorry you feel out of place in your home. Totally get wanting to live among a people you identify with.

    • @Longpork_afficianado@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      I reckon if you could get there 10 years early you could probably prevent the entire thing. If you were capable of convincing some of the larger groups within the americas of the impending invasion, there were certainly people and resources enough to put together a small navy and start patrolling the eastern coast. Throw is some modern knowledge of firearms and metallurgy to help them develop some cannon, and Columbus never makes it to America.

      Back in Europe people assume him lost at sea, and leave the atlantic untouched for another generation. With that much time to prepare, who knows how things play out.

  • @rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    97 months ago

    1870s in the Southeastern United States. I’m gonna make goddamn sure Reconstruction doesn’t just end and Jim Crow functionally re-invents slavery.

  • @rothaine@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77 months ago

    Maybe ancient Athens? Just sit around eating grapes and talking about triangles and shit. And even if I get rng’d into slavery, I could draw the Pythagorean theorem in the dirt, and a passing scholar would be like “holy shit, come with me dude”