• Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    8 months ago

    Another great example is “Chunk” from the Goonies (1985). He was considered so fat that it was comic relief. Now you can walk through any Middle School in the United States and find dozens, if not hundreds, of kids that are MUCH larger!

    • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      136
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m the flip side, Go back and watch Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. Once you’re done cringing at the racism, think about the fact that Harrison Ford went on an intense weightlifting program for that movie, and was considered the most shredded leading man in Hollywood at the time. Actors using steroids has become so common that it has also skewed our perception of a normal fit guy’s body.

      • fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        IMO Harrison Ford looks pretty damn fit in that picture and I wouldn’t bat an eye if he were in a super hero movie today. Like that’s not a Thor body but there are many characters where that body would fit in just fine. I agree that movie bodies are not very attainable for most people with busy lives, but on the other hand, if you’re playing a super hero you’re not playing an average person. It would probably be weird to see an average body shape doing the impossible stunts you see in action movies.

          • fidodo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            8 months ago

            Even with the lore explanations, I think it just helps maintain suspension of disbelief when you visually see someone muscular doing impossible feats of strength rather than someone physically unfit. But to your point, I would like to see more super heroes with strongman barrel physics instead of the aesthetic prioritizing body builder physique.

            • Khrux@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              8 months ago

              I think Spiderman is a decent example of not being comically ripped but I always believe he’s as strong as he’s depicted due to his powers.

              • fidodo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                Spiderman is still super fit. He’s lean muscle and not bulky body builder fit, but he still has muscle. Even in the comics his muscles are very well defined.

          • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Well, I don’t know about Thor (but he is a god short of and from an advanced culture ), but Superman received perfect nutrition from our Sun.

            There is that alt timeline story of Superman where he didn’t see the Sun and was captured when he landed as a baby.

            He grew up to be skinny and had severe malnutrition, was still tall and became strong as soon as he saw the sun the first time.

        • Hasuris@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Back when they made “300” it was almost satire how shredded these guys looked. It was obvious it wasn’t realistic and wasn’t meant to be. Nowadays we get shows like Reacher with an absolutely humongous lead that’s supposed to wander around doing jack shit all day… right. His mother shat him out this way.

          And female “tough” leads are often tiny and no muscle in sight yet they still kick ass and routinely dispose off bad guys twice their size. Why do the guys even need to be this big when physics don’t matter?

          I hate this so much. Hollywood is so fucking fake.

      • Bierjunge@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah thats totally true. Just look at photos of Bruce Lee for example. A fighting machine but not nearly as big as any one of the gym bros nowadays that train for volume.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    8 months ago

    But at this point in the film, hadn’t he lost like 15+ pounds and also shouldn’t soldiers be held to a slimmer standard than others? And yeah the movie was made a long time ago. Most people are actually fat now.

    • Oderus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      8 months ago

      He did gain 70lbs for the role so technically he was fat, just not as fat as some people are today.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah but my point was I remember thinking he got skinnier throughout the film, as though he was supposed to getting “whipped into shape”

        • zaph@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          8 months ago

          throughout the film

          It’s been awhile since I’ve seen it but I’m pretty sure this guy redecorated the bathroom in bootcamp.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Ok granted maybe it was only a 25 minute period I’m talking about but there was a progression iirc. “Redecorating the bathroom” is the crudest least empathetic way I can imagine putting it

          • thefartographer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Oh cool! Like new wallpaper and tiles or just redid the backsplash? Either way, that’s mighty kind of him. That guy’s got a real good head on his shoulders.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Apparently nobody’s clothes fit after basic because you either lose weight or gain muscle.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      This was my thought exactly. The military has actual weight standards. So he could be fat compared to all his fellow soldiers, but not fat by normal standards.

    • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Don’t know about slimmer but soldiers should definitely be carrying less fat reserves and moving with more muscle mass. Calories supplied in the field, and if the logistics for that break down then you’re not going to live long enough to starve.

        • psmgx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          8 months ago

          He rattled off a nonstop stream of profanity and insults for like 10 min straight as a way of training / demo-ing to the actor. Kubrick thought he did a far better job and left him in the role. Much of his dialog was ad-libed.

          The original DI ended up as the crazy guy shooting civilians from the helicopter. “You guys oughta do a story about me!”

        • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Nah, more like abusing his contact with him. If my memory doesn’t fail, he was hired as an instructor for the actors but he thought he could do it better, so he started sending audition tapes to Kubrick. Kubrick eventually got tired and watched the tapes and he loved it, so the guy got hired.

          Or maybe I’m just misremembering 🤷🏻‍♀️

          • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            8 months ago

            Hired to coach actors to act like drill instructors because he was a drill instructor. Turns out it was more effective to just have the former drill instructor act like a drill instructor. Turns out the drill instructor did do it better than the actors, and ended up being one of the most accurate portrayals ever put to film.

            • frostysauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              Except it’s not accurate. He played it as the worst example of an ineffective, sadistic drill sergeant. He has said that over half of that stuff wouldn’t fly even back when he was in boot. To make it realistic that Pyle would snap he had to be a truly horrible drill sergeant, so that’s how he played the role.

              • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                8 months ago

                Having been through boot camp I can tell you there is a big over lap between what officially wouldn’t fly and what unofficially does happen. He became a spokesperson for The Corps, even getting promoted after leaving service, of course he wouldn’t sully the reputation of the Marine Corps on record.

  • ZMonster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It’s military standards and boot camp. It has literally nothing to do with perception. Look at drill for a fraction of a second while standing at attention and he will berate you endlessly for trying to suck him off with your eyes. Your bootlace is dragging because you’re dumb. You’re tired because you’re weak. And you are the fattest motherfucker in this universe because you stood in front of the cake in the chow line for too long. It’s not about perception. It’s just basic. Even in active duty today, he would still be considered overweight, and even if he passed the PT test it wouldn’t protect him from getting chaptered out for fitness.

    6’ 5", 200#, according to the Army, I was overweight by 15 lbs. I ran A group most mornings in PT (fastest, farthest runners), ran low 6 min miles, maxed situps and still had to wait 40 seconds for the test to end. Pushups were always low but fuck off, soy alto. I started lifting, gained 50 lbs, and my neck grew to 19"+ and all of the sudden I was “fit”, even though I couldn’t run A group anymore, couldn’t break 7 min miles, and barely finished the situps in time. No improvement on pushups so don’t stop fucking off. It’s just military standards. It has literally nothing to do with perception. And people were fat before the 80s, JTFC did I just have to say that? Sure, there are more today, but it’s not like Pvt Pyle was broadly considered obese by civilians at the time. The people ITT… 🙄

    • systemglitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sure we had fat people back then, but it was nothing like how it is today. Now most people are fat, and that wasn’t the case in the 80’s.

      • ZMonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        No, it was exactly that. When my neck taped in over 19, it was the first time I had ever not been on PT watch. I had to do higher frequency PT testing. It was dumb.

  • 800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    8 months ago

    Shit, have you seen all those fatass larping gravy seals out there at right wing larps? Some of them are so fat on their rascals it’s amazing they can even hold a gun and have enough strength to squeeze out a runny turd, let alone a trigger!

    Sgt. Hartman would have a field day.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      The ones on scooters are weak.

      But you’d be amazed how strong the ones who can walk are. Can you carry 250 pounds up a flight of stairs without significant effort? Because there are 400-pound people who walk up staircases every day without trouble. The fact that they can walk, get up after lying down, etc requires that they be immensely strong.

      All this is to say, don’t get yourself into a position where one may take a swing at you. They may be out of shape, slow, etc, but if they land a hit there’s a lot of muscle and mass behind it that shouldn’t be underestimated just because they’re unhealthy.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They claim “well-regulated” means “properly functioning” and not “subject to regulations”, but how functional is a militia of morbidly obese men with no combat training, no psychological assessments and no demonstrated ability to use or safely handle a weapon, who probably enthusiastically voted for the government that needs overthrowing?

      They’re children claiming they need a PlayStation 5 “for homework”.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Dude what about Chunk?

    That kid was fat for his time.

    Nowadays that’s practically median.

    Even 10 years later, Heavyweights was literally about really fat kids. They aren’t really fat nowadays.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    8 months ago

    Everyone back then was living on cocaine and cigarettes. That dude was just a little thicc is all.

    • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Born too late to die of consumption, born too early to be infused with microplastics, but born just in time to enjoy all the asbestos and cigarettes he could possibly want

    • anivia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      This dude was overweight enough that it was a health problem. Calling him “just a little thicc” makes you part if the problem

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Can you, like, chill? God damn.

        It’s a fucking movie and they wrote the character that way. The actor, Vincent D’Onofrio was in much better shape than what he made us believe. That’s what acting is, after all.

  • Swarfega@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Hell I like you. You can come over to my house and fuck my sister

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s hard to remember that fucking everyone was super thin until like 1990. When the movie came out, the audience considered him to be huge.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 months ago

      No no they where not. I know it’s a shock but their where fat people before the 90’s.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, dear, but go find a photo of someone’s birthday party in 1985 and compare to today. The average weight has increased dramatically. If you deny this then you’re just being oppositional.

  • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think my kids are old enough to appreciate the jokes in Full Metal Jacket now. I got them to watch LOTR and now we started with The Hobbit. Star Wars next, but that’s a tough one, since it seems old to them, but maybe I’ll start with Rogue One since it’s the best modern star wars movie.

    • groet@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      Honestly it might be the best Star wars movie, period. At least from todays perspective. The original trilogy was groundbreaking for their own time but haven’t aged the best. As with many media, what was innovative 40 years ago is cliche and stale today.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I always hear that. I couldn’t get more than 30 seconds into the movie

        Episode 8 made me unable to watch the movies. But Episode 7 killed Star wars for me though - when it came down our entire department took a half day to go together

        I’ll never forget walking out of that theatre, the people who only kinda liked it were happy, the guy who memorized wookepedia was disappointed, then I shared a look with my team lead, who has been a diehard fan since the originals, he’s a big old school nerd.

        We just shared a look of despair and loss, something we loved died that day. We’d both extensively read the extended universe, and we’d talk about it frequently. I don’t think we ever brought up Star wars again after that day

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Solo is the only Star Wars movie they’ve released since the OT in my opinion.

        The rest tried too hard, but Solo had the YEEHAW which made Star Wars great.

        I know folks hate it, but it was fun in the way Star Wars (ANH) was for me as a kid.

          • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Was a great movie, I loved it.

            It was set in the Star Wars universe which I love, but my statement is more about the “yee haw hold on to your assholes” that Star Wars was before there was a Empire strikes Back even.

            What I loved about Star Wars is what Solo did for me

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      They will like it 100x better when they watch it for the first time on their own in college with their friends

    • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hope you didn’t make them watch the extended Hobits. I’m not gonna risk it with my kids - I’m starting with LOTR

    • DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      What are you even arguing? OP is talking about what is accepted as fat has changed. Those two examples you mentioned? Fat. Gomer Pile? Disgusting fat body.

      No one is talking about comparative stats against other countries or questioning the existence of fat people 😂

      Also, you type like you’re trying to not sound like the mid 30s person you are, whole assidly 😭🤣

    • Hasuris@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      https://usafacts.org/articles/obesity-rate-nearly-triples-united-states-over-last-50-years/

      “In the early 1960s, roughly 13% of people were considered obese by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. Recent figures suggest that a current national obesity rate closer to 43%.”

      Looks to me the fatties have doubled since the 80s and 90s. Just because there used to be fat people before, doesn’t mean there’s no problem today. Line goes up. If the trend continues, it’s just like 2-3 decades till almost everyone is fat.

      Seems like a big problem to me

  • daltotron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It is now year-round bulking season, and I’m loving every minute of it, jerry.

    Biggest difference between your conventional fat dude and a sumo wrestler is the nature of their fat deposits. Regular fat dudes, no exercise, have what is called “visceral fat”, where the fat is beneath the skin, and exists in between the organs. Sumo wrestlers have subcutaneous fat deposits, just right beneath the skin, as a sort of layer between the organs and the skin. It truly matters less whether or not you’re fat, and more whether or not you’re active, and have a good dietary composition regardless of potential caloric excess.

    The only major limitation on this that I might qualify is that overweight people will probably have to put more effort into flexibility and strength exercises, especially in their lower body, their ankles, their knees, for the same reason that extremely tall people tend to have similar injuries. There’s also the problem that it tends to be harder to cut back later in life, and so you can kind of see a huge onset of lots of visceral fat if you keep up the same lifestyle choices while cutting back on the activity, or even keeping the same level of activity as your metabolism slows down, so that’s something to also consider.

    People also have made points about how the excess of simply carbohydrates, like high fructose corn syrup, and palm oil as a preservative in highly processed american foods, and food deserts, are contributing factors to why americans tend to be super fat. This is true. The other side of this coin also tends to be that american civic infrastructure doesn’t tend to keep you as active as perhaps other countries might, so there are less opportunities to burn calories without making a kind of committed lifestyle choice centered around that.

    In any case, I do find it really, sad, and funny also, that people tend to treat obesity as a kind of personal moral failing, rather than treating it like any other kind of public health problem, or epidemic. Reminds me of how they treated HIV.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      And mental health, and addiction, and anything else that lets people write another person off as “bad” and not worthy of their compassion.

      • daltotron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah. Strikes me as the laziest possible explanation for a thing, and it always seems to ironically come from people who are convinced that they’re better than others because they’re working harder or trying more.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The least compassionate people I know are the ones fastest to write off the humanity of others.

          I swear, without irony, that if a young black man got shot in the face for parking next to a yellow curb, some of the people I’m thinking of would say “welp, shouldn’t have broke the law!”

  • OKaybin@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    People aren’t shoveling foods into their gullets anymore, they’re dumping truckloads into it and proud of it.

    • Demographics (She/Her)
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Alternatively: Capitalism has robbed the working class of any time for exercise while simultaneously pushing food that is dirt cheap to make with artificial additives that lead to excess consumption.

      But that doesn’t fit the convenient narrative of “it’s all society’s fault,” which pushes all blame and need for action off the observer.

        • maniclucky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          8 months ago

          Clearly because you don’t struggle with this thing, the struggles of others are invalid.

          Capitalism is significantly at fault because it pushes more and more food, makes cheap (read: affordable) food severely fattening, and creates industries that prey on people’s insecurities and entices them into all kinds of disordered eating. To say nothing about the general decline of physical and mental health caused by unfettered capitalism that often manifests as disordered eating.

          But yeah, eating too much is the only problem. Thanks I’m cured /s

        • deur@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Man shut the fuck up, shut up.

          A can of mountain dew is:

          • In America: 355 mL with 170 calories (0.49 kcal/mL)
          • In Germany: 330 mL with 95.7 calories (0.29 kcal/mL)

          Feast your eyes upon this and perhaps begin to question the dumb bullshit perspective that lives in your head.

          Yes Americans, you do deserve to be able to enjoy a soda without fucking your calorie intake up. Did I mention the german one uses real sugar and tastes way better, which makes it harder to drink in excess?

        • TommySalami@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          As a non-fat person who doesn’t exercise consistently, it’s not that simple for the vast majority. There are a lot of factors including health/genetics and the stuff mentioned in the comment you responded to. I’m not skinny because I avoid meals, I’m skinny because I lucked out genetically and I really don’t have to worry about what I eat in terms of gaining weight.

          Also, avoiding meals is like the worst way to maintain your weight and you should stop implicitly recommending it. It’s just going fuck up your metabolism, nutrition, and ability to maintain your weight. Quality matters substantially more than quantity, and quality is prohibitively expensive for many.

            • maniclucky@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              8 months ago

              Quick guideline that’ll help you be more empathetic to the rest of humanity: other people’s experiences aren’t like yours. Their bodies behave differently, they have different socioeconomic statuses, their minds struggle with things yours finds easy and vice versa. So “skip a meal” is trivial for you and impossible for another. That’s why many different diets exist.

              Stop painting humanity with one brush just because you can’t see outside your own world view.

              Also: A chunk of human history where we skipped meals regularly also involved getting eaten by predators. Just because it was true in the past does not make it true now. Having access to calorie bombs 24/7 is normal now. And society hasn’t figured out how to deal with that. Some handle it fine, others handle it poorly.

            • Laurentide@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              I eat two meals a day. I drink mostly plain water, with some black coffee and unsweetened tea. I cut out soda over a decade ago and sweets are a rare luxury. I can’t afford to eat massive amounts of food even if I want to. So why am I still fat?

        • irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          8 months ago

          Food deserts exist, man. I’ve been there. Living in a shithole area with no shops supplying fresh foods, and no convenient transport links to such shops

          You’re probably just gonna go to the overpriced shop and buy processed crap, y’know?

            • irmoz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              If processed food is the only option, how exactly do you “just buy less of it”? Eat nothing? Be serious, dude.

              • AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’ve had great success losing weight and saving money at Taco Bell.

                Reading the calories and reading the body’s signals are key. It took awhile for me to separate the craving for flavors from the pangs of genuine hunger.

                • irmoz@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Nutrition tho…

                  The focus on weight, specifically, is a mistake. Health is far more than just weight. Eating junk food is bad, full stop, and will cause issues for health no matter your portions. This is the problem.

                  Diabetes, risk of cancer, addiction, malnutrition, even mental health problems, all are risk factors on a diet of processed food, even so-called “healthy” diets.

        • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ah yes, thank you for your single data point. That’ll be sure to topple this mountain of evidence otherwise.

        • frostysauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          it’s not hard to

          People who say this almost always refuse to believe there can be any nuance to situations beyond their own limited experience.

    • Duranie@literature.cafe
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      Proud of consuming truckloads of food? I must have missed that memo. Alternative take - overstressed, overworked, and struggling to survive, seeking out any kind of dopamine or serotonin bandaid to make the struggle with bothering for one more day worth it. It’s not something people typically WANT to do, but it can be an unhealthy coping mechanism when options are limited.