• Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      159
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I could see them making people work centuries to pay off the debt, or even worse, it only extends your life by a few years at a time and they turn it into a subscription service

        • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Fantastic hard sci-fi book series. And it didn’t focus on this one high concept but has lots of themes about humanity. PS: Apparently a TV series is under development!

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I never really understood why people called it similar to The Forever War.

            The “similar premise” is mostly just acknowledging that relativity is important to space travel.

            • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wait, Old Man’s War has FTL? Or was it important for in-system battles? I haven’t read them in a while.

              I recently red The Star Carrier Series by Ian Douglas and that has FTL and interesting hard-sci fi battles with relativity effects.

              I agree that the forever war is quite different in concept and style, much more esoterical.

              • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                OMW uses “skip drives” which are teleportation through multidimensional travel, time dilation is still a bit of a factor, but not nearly to the extent of The Forever War where it’s practically the whole idea (as far as the science in the sci-fi goes)

                • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah that’s how I remember it. The similar premise is that in both stories people leave earth and go on extended war campaigns.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s also the terrific book, Immortality, Inc. by Robert Sheckley, a book I bought on a whim when killing time in a college bookstore with a tiny sci-fi section and have since recommended to many people who thanked me for the recommendation.

          The concept is that in the future, it is discovered that there is an afterlife, but only a very small number of people can get there naturally. So a medical procedure is developed that allows people to get to the afterlife. However, only the wealthy can afford it. Once their afterlife is guaranteed (things can go wrong, but that’s another issue), they do things like start hacking people to death in the streets to commit suicide-by-cop because what have they got to lose?

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immortality,_Inc.

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. They transferred their mind to new bodies, called sleeves. They had laws against double sleeving, putting your mind into more than one body, cause that causes all sorts of issues. The tech was basically what you’re stopped to do for computers back up data and when something happens to the computer you put the same data on the new machine. The basic version was local storage called a stack that resided at the base of the neck. That’s why executions killed the person and the stack. The rich had offside backups as well.

          This is closer to In Time where the single body was kept alive and they used time to pay for things. The rich had thousands, probably much more, years stocked up. It’s been quite a while since I’ve seen it.

        • Decoy321@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In a sense, but it’s a common cyberpunk theme. I remember an old movie called Repo Men with a similar premise, which was based off a pretty dope book, Repossession Mambo.

          Its essentially the same premise, but with loaning artificial organs.

    • De_Narm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only works for a one time payment, life as a subscription can’t be paid for with a loan. At least not forever.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah, the ultra rich assholes would still want to wipe their asses with all the resources in the world, just to ensure “the poor and undesirables” don’t get to use it before them.

  • Dojan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gods, you couldn’t pay me enough to live forever. I’m looking forward to dying.

    • Gormadt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      1 year ago

      Living forever is a curse for sure if you have no way out

      But living as long as you want in good health is for sure pretty awesome

  • FunkyMonk@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    oh hey that timberlake movie that wasnt called time is money because we live in the enshittified universe

  • wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Usual caveat: Only the Americans can’t afford it. Everybody else would get it courtesy of their govts

  • lugal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    That puts too much blame on individuals instead of the system. These aren’t bad apples, the system isn’t broken. The system works as intended, it’s just that most of us are on the losing end. Also: there is no alternative.

      • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would specifically want the Mutualist kind, not the Marxist one. Direct stakeholder ownership helps keep things from being too bureaucratic and prevents a top-down power grabs.

      • lugal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hope you know I don’t disagree with you. The system is unsustainable for sure, we need a new one. It can’t be fixed because there is no “fixed” or good or green capitalism (hence it’s not broken because it was never meant to be sustainable). My last sentence was a Thatcher quote I quoted ironically.

  • SolarMech@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    The other equivalent of this is a carbon capture technology that actually works. It’s also far-fetched from what we know yet.

    But the day it exists, capital will pour into it since it’s a way to get paid by subsidies for the rest of your life. And all you need to do to also to grow that sector is burn more fossil fuel and it works so long as government can tax people more. It’s kind of like having both the poison for the whole world, and the cure, and demanding ransom (while being paid for the poison).