You would still have the same age, gender, personality, skin color, etc. and you would be able to speak at least one local language and would know basic information of the era and place. Your family, social standing, and such would be randomly picked.

  • mke_geek@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Back in time if you’re gay? Or trans? Or a woman? Or a person of color?

    No thanks.

    • pruneaue
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you go further back in time you can get back to fairly queer friendly societies

    • magnetosphere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gay? Ancient Greece. Person of color? Just pick someplace that won’t have significant contact with different races during your lifetime.

      • MudMan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right?

        We’re going on a tangent here, but I feel like Western progressives, particularly with anglo backgrounds, tend to think the entire world runs by their parameters and always has. There is nothing intrinsic to the current kinds of bigotry in their societies. It’s pretty arbitrary and specific, in fact.

          • MrsDoyle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Especially ancient Africa! Look up Mansa Musa, king of Mali. Carthage too. Zimbabwe. Benin. Egypt too, it’s in Africa.