• Jaysyn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The USA could end homelessness or hunger (and maybe both) nationally for the amount of money we sent to Israel each year.

        • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, no they could not lol. Not even remotely close.

          The US spends $2 Billion a year on aid to Israel.

          They spend $105 Billion a year in direct payments to SNAP (food stamps) recipients.

          And $32 Billion a year on section 8 housing vouchers.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Since ‘48, we’ve sent over 158 billion in aid- without adjusting for inflation.

            It’s more than all other countries combined- including Ukraine.

            Even that 2 billion could go a very long way to helping.

            • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re right, it could.

              In fact, the US could fund a few wars and conflicts, end homelessness, implement socialized healthcare and fund the world’s best public transit system with affordable high-speed trains between cities simultaneously.

              But they don’t because they don’t want to, not because they can’t.

        • torpak@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          That homelessness and hunger are not ended in the USA is not because the money needed is spent on other things, it is because the government doesn’t want to end them.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Or else we will be very, very angry with you. And we will write you a letter, telling you how angry we are.”

    • drdalek13@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      I definitely get your point here, but a ground invasion would be irreversible. They would never leave Gaza

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They didn’t demand evacuation back then. They invaded, killed a bunch of people, declared victory, then left (obvious oversimplification). This time, they ordering the civilian population to leave seems to be an indication they expect to invade, murder stragglers, then annex the land once it’s empty and leveled. It does seem to go along with the rhetoric of “exerting a price they’ve never dreamed of”.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s very much a price the Palestinians dream of though. Israeli settler groups did exactly that in 1947.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      It appears that Israel possibly was aware the attack was going to happen and they allowed it. Regardless, Israel supports Hamas. They need Hamas so they can justify their murder and colonialism. I agree Hamas is bad, but the Zionists have done much more harm. Bibi should not be in office.

      • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I would need much, much more solid proof for this conspiracy theory before believing it.

        I don’t doubt Israel had some unspecified warnings, but I just think it’s much more likely that it was a mixture of a misguided belief that Hamas was more interested in political power than large scale terrorism, an assumption that any attack would just be “regular” rocket attacks like we’ve seen in the last years, incompetence of Israeli intelligence services, and an over confidence that the fence and Iron Dome would be enough to stop any attack.

        Also, Israel doesn’t need Hamas. Just look at the West Bank where Hamas isn’t in power.

        Agree though that Bibi shouldn’t be in power.

        • MoistMogwai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s a difficult thing to prove without a whistle blower fairly high up in Israeli intelligence. What does look very suspicious is one of the most advanced intelligence agencies in the world “missed it”, and it took one of the most well funded and constantly present in the area militaries 8 hours to respond.

          Israel has had a major PR problem as more and more people view Palestinians as people who also deserve to be alive. Letting a terrorist group in that region attack undefended is a way for Israel to play the victim as they respond by taking more land homes and lives.

    • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hamas is palestines means of fighting back at their oppressors. You can’t say they are separate entities, because without Hamas, Palestinians would all be dead by now. Its like saying “I support having meat, but not the killing of animals”. And why are you pro Israel? They want to do genocide. If the Israeli people are innocent of their countries crimes, they will overthrow the government.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Without Hamas, Palestinians would have their own country lol

        Hamas is literally the only reason they do not. Hamas only exists because Israel was finally close to talking Abbas into a two state solution, which he had previously always denied.

        How do you not know this, at this point?

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        A bunch of 20 year olds raving in the desert are not “the oppressors.”

        You are just stating your opinion.

        The real fascists are netanyahu and his ilk.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the Israeli people are innocent of their countries crimes, they will overthrow the government.

        It never, ever works that way. Seriously, name one time when a government was overthrown by its own citizens for committing atrocities against foreigners.

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t believe in setting bars people are demonstrably unable to reach. You’re basically asking people to start a civil war to protect strangers they’ll never meet, knowing the outcome of such a war is far from certain. Even if you win, the damage to your country could be catastrophic, and the odds of ending up with new leaders who are at least as bad as the old ones are pretty high.

            • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, you should start a civil war to prevent your country doing genocide. Because the alternative is genocide. What exactly is complicated about this?

              • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’re not listening to what I’m saying.

                Also, why are you on the internet and not out overthrowing a genocidal government right now? Shame on you!

                • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I am listening to what you’re saying, you’re making excuses for Americans who don’t care enough to stop a genocide happening on their dime.

                  What do you think the most effective way is for an American to try to prevent this genocide? Your whataboutism isn’t wholly wrong, but I don’t know what I’m supposed to do beyond writing to my senators demanding that they kill the funding. So, what is your answer?

    • Zoolander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Genuine question… how is killing 1800 people protecting oneself against an attack that killed 1200 people? I would agree that Israel has a right to protect itself from terrorist attacks but I fail to see how killing more people protects anyone. If anything, it’s just instigating the terrorists to continue to try and kill more people.

    • Onfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You think Hamas won’t be in power unless majority of people supports it? They celebrated when Hamas murder those citizens.

  • SpiralSong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 year ago

    Biden “And definitely don’t occupy 5 different countrys at the same time. Some of them for over 20 years. Come on man!”

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, what will he or the Democrats do when Israel does occupy Gaza?

    Continue to provide unequivocal support and money to Israel?

    It’s not like they’ll do anything else like officially recognize Israel has been acting as a apartheid state causing mass human suffering which in turn grew more mass suffering and conflict.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t you dare cross this line!

      Ok don’t cross this line!!

      Ok don’t cross THIS line!

      Ok I’m going inside, if you knock, I’m not coming out.

    • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Obama picked Biden for VP because he was a darling of the Israel lobby, who didn’t particularly like Obama. Anyone who’s satisfied by this sort of lip service from Biden were just looking for any reason to absolve the administration to serve a partisan political alignment.

    • Reality Suit@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it would be the ultimate show of force if the U.S. gives aid to Israel, tells Israel to not go any further, and when they do, the U.S. obliterates their military. “We helped you and you still lost.” I just wish the innocent wouldn’t get killed. The innocent and vulnerable are always the ones who suffer. Fuck war.

  • Guydht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    So many empty hateful comments here miss the fact that 70 years ago was 70 years ago, and since then a whole new generation of people are living in the region. Israelies who don’t feel obligated to have Israel but don’t want anti-Semitism abroad, and palestinians who don’t mind staying where they were born, inside the 48 borders, but want a decent live inside of it. No leader from any place on earth is working towards them. Israeli leaders want the whole country for themselves, and Palestinian leaders also want the whole land for themselves. Neither is plausible without serious loss of life. So stop being so one-sided and actually acknowledge there are two sides to this conflict, and that all parties are reaponsible. Israel would give anything in the world to have peaceful rulers in Gaza.

    • Tony@lemmy.stad.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israel would give anything in the world to have peaceful rulers in Gaza.

      All the evidence tells us this is not true.

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was with them until that comment. Israeli people might want that, but the action of the Israeli government has been the opposite. Funny they say ‘stop being so one-sided’ and say Israel wants peaceful rulers, like Palestinians don’t want that also.

        • Tony@lemmy.stad.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          like Palestinians don’t want that also.

          Exactly. This fiction that Palestinians all want Hamas to murder Israelis, or even want them to stay in charge is dangerous, because they open the door to even more moderate people buying the idea that the only thing preventing peace is Palestinians wanting it.

          From https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/polls-show-majority-gazans-were-against-breaking-ceasefire-hamas-and-hezbollah :

          While the majority of Gazans (65%) did think it likely that there would be “a large military conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza” this year, a similar percentage (62%) supported Hamas maintaining a ceasefire with Israel. Moreover, half (50%) agreed with the following proposal: “Hamas should stop calling for Israel’s destruction, and instead accept a permanent two-state solution based on the 1967 borders.” Moreover, across the region, Hamas has lost popularity over time among many Arab publics. This decline in popularity may have been one of the motivating factors behind the group’s decision to attack.

          In fact, Gazan frustration with Hamas governance is clear; most Gazans expressed a preference for PA administration and security officials over Hamas—the majority of Gazans (70%) supported a proposal of the PA sending “officials and security officers to Gaza to take over the administration there, with Hamas giving up separate armed units,” including 47% who strongly agreed. Nor is this a new view—this proposal has had majority support in Gaza since first polled by The Washington Institute in 2014.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So stop being so one-sided and actually acknowledge there are two sides to this conflict, and that all parties are reaponsible.

      I find comments like this frustrating.

      There may be two sides, but there’s only one side with an actual military and nukes and only one side running an apartheid. The only reason people aren’t referring to Israel as a terrorist state (which they are) is that they’re destroying hospitals with bombs dropped from planes and shooting news reporters with guns held by soldiers in military uniforms.

      The other side has no military, has been blockaded for sixteen years, is terrorized and killed at will without recourse, and isn’t actually allowed to leave.

      What makes Israel the criminal here is the power they wield and how they’ve chosen to use it.

      So sure, yeah, there are two sides, yes, but the two sides are very, very different.

      • Sparking@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could have said the same thing 70 years ago about the leader if mandatory Palestine who was appointed by the British colonizers and collaborated with Nazis, and that a group like Irgun bravely fought against them. The same Irgun that carried out the Deir Yassin massacre.

        What Israel’s government is doing is wrong, and they should pay for it. And Israel should pay reparations. But the majority of Israeli’s, Palestinians, and American Jews and Muslims just want peace man. This whole thing about who colonized who is silly.

            • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The difference is Israel still exists, holding Palestine back, it’s not even about reparations but stopping the actions on-going today, not just about righting wrongs from the past.

              • Sparking@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Reparations are crucial in stopping current unjust policies. That is something I believe anyway. A government can’t actively acknowledge the existence of injustice as simultaneously support policy that perpetuates it. That is one of the reasons why governments are so reluctant to pay reparations in the first place.

                For Israel’s continued existence as a state, it is crucial that they pay reparations. This might mean that a few Jewish American young adults might not get to go on a free vacation to Israel, but so be it.

        • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, Hamas is palestines only means of fighting their oppressors. The US has made military conflict impossible for Palestine to win, and so they resort to harming whichever Israeli they can find.

      • Guydht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh so because the other side is weak they’re supposed to just sit idle when they murder pillage and rape? You’re disregarding all the brutal fights Israel has fought against its neighbours as “they’re strong so boo hoo”. They also have thousands dead. They’re also terrorized daily. Just because they’re stronger doesn’t make them less right. Again, they of course have a responsibility in this situation, but come on. Please tell me of any rocket launchers hidden inside a hospital Israel has. Blaming solely israel for the palestinian miserable lives is half the story. A big part of it is their terrorist leadership who take advantage of their poverty to promote a gruesome war they started (not talking about these days, talking about 48, where all the UN agreed on something and they chose to invade. Since then both sides are fully taking part in this war.).

    • endhits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have no knowledge of the history and it’s painfully obvious.

      Hamas exists because Israel killed secular resistance movements and funded Hamas’ rise.

      • Guydht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh right, it’s not like gaza had a democratic elections where Hamas won… (And then ran a coup murdering the opposition). Israel chose the (what seemed then) less of two greater evil. Clearly they were wrong, and they faced the consequences on saturday.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      that 70 years ago was 70 years ago,

      I don’t have a row to hoe in any of this but that alone tells me you’re full of shit and apologizing for some evil asshole somewhere in the conflict. The past is always gonna matter whether you want it to or not.

      • Guydht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Clearly you don’t understand what I mean, since you’re not that knowledgeable in this conflict. Palestinians’ leaders final goal is to get the 48 borders back. Nothing less and nothing more. And to that I said that it’s been 70 years, and you’ll need to grab it by conquest to get it, since the people lived there an entire life, and will never give it up. The leaders from both sides need to understand that any further border change between them will only make things worse, and the ones who started wanting to conquer was Palestinians. Now Israel is doing the same, but after many years, in which they got more right wing and more national, because of course they will when their busses are bombed by terrorists on the other side. I’m not saying Israel is clear of charge, I just say that they started better than Palestinians, then got more national as time went, because obviously - their enemies are murdering rapists. Palestinians are consistent with their desire to destroy Israel, Israelies have been building up to it (talking about each of their leaders, a.k.a the ones who matter).

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So in other words you really really want me to reject the notion that the past matters, and therefore you can be dismissed outright.

          • Guydht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            *The distant past. A.k.a, the 48 past. So much has changed since then, including the people themselves. People should act based on how to improve their present and future, not how to improve (avenge) their past.

    • GreekPoliticsMatters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      i understand you are well intentioned but really also simplistic and generic. what you have said can apply to any conflict just changing the names.

      the world through the UN resolutions has clearly indicated who is the oppressor and violators of human rights.

      it is the state of Israel itself.

      • Guydht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right now? Yeah, definitely they’re violating human rights. But what are they supposed to do given their history? Every Palestinian leadership ever called out for civilians to be "jihad"s (terrorists) and kill as many as possible. I was simplistic because everyone here on lemmy also talks simplisticly. Talk of no nuance and no faults on both sides, mainly say “israel bad”, “israel apartheid”, “israel should stop existing” - all while forgetting this conflict has two sides. Yes, one side is poorer, but that doesn’t make them more just. Both are wrong, but arguably palestinian leadership are the worst here. Being at a huge disadvantage and still choosing to fight a war they’ll lose, while in the process keeping their citizens poor. At least Israel evacuated the cities near Gaza, while Hamas blocked people evacuating outside of a warzone.

        • GreekPoliticsMatters@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          sorry for late response.

          well,is it not true that the entity who denies the right of existence to the other side has been Israel?

          is it not true that Israel is a terrorist state by any definition of the word?

          and is it not true that Hamad is truely something which if it did not exist, Israel would wish it existed?

          and is it not true that that which Israel wishes for, Israel gets?

          what are your thoughts on these?

          • Guydht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago
            1. Palestine denies the existence of Israel, even stated by the symbols of Hamas and the PLO, coloring the entire state of Israel as their territory. Now, who actually has the right to that land? The ones who bought those lands in the early 20th century and got a majority vote of the U.N to their creation alongside their neighbours? Or is it the ones who objected since the beginning up until today that no jew can rule any part of that land? The biggest diners of the other side’s existence are the Palestinians. They have since the beginning denied the right for a jewish state to exist. Israel started to deny a Palestinian state to exist only after the arabs started an all-out war on Israel.

            2. Terrorist state? What does that even mean considering they Palestinians aren’t their citizens? They’re a state who has very hostile neighbours right next to them, and that acts with aggression to aggression. No act of violence against civilians has been started by the IDF, while hundreds of acts of violence have started against civilians by Hamas (the PLO don’t directly do terrorism, but they pay terrorist jihad’s families for killing innocents).

            3. Can you really say that Israel wishes for Hamas? Even after 7/10 can you seriously say that Israel wishes for such a violent terrorist organization to exist right next to their borders? If so then that’s some severe case of Stockholm syndrome. Yes, Hamas is simpler to deal with politically, but it’s so much more threatening and hard to deal with militarily. How are they supposed to fight people who hide amongst innocents? Hamas is probably the biggest headache to Israel ever. They ruin their relations with Suni arab countries, they make them look bad to the western world by making them bomb civilian infrastructure, and they actively pillage their villages for terror’s sake. Seriously, how can Israel wish for that.

            Also let’s be clear, what Israel wants is the entire land of Israel, including the west bank, all under jewish control. That’s obviously their best scenario. Do they get what they wish? No. Do they work for it? Yeah. Can you blame them? Idk. Probably. They really should work more towards creating a Palestinian state in the west bank/gaza, but that could be said for the Palestinian leaders as well, who are still advocating for the entire annexation of Palestinians over the entire land of Israel (“from the river to the sea…”).

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      In reality, there are far more than two sides. At least we should look at four groups: Israel and Palestine, crossed with militant and non-militant.

      Thinking in terms of only two sides is a trap, because it invites people (not you, but others who have the same starting point) to justify mass killing in the name of revenge or justice or deterrence whatever label they prefer.

      • azulavoir@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, there are two sides.

        One side, Hamas, the Zionist government, and their supporters.

        The other side, the civilians of both cultures who just want their supposed representatives to stop fighting.

  • Copernican@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I think it’d be a big mistake,” Mr. Biden told “60 Minutes” on CBS in a conversation taped on Thursday and aired on Sunday night. “Look, what happened in Gaza, in my view, is Hamas and the extreme elements of Hamas don’t represent all the Palestinian people. And I think that it would be a mistake for Israel to occupy Gaza again.” But “taking out the extremists” there, he added, “is a necessary requirement.”

    I’m not sure how anyone is taking this as a controversial take. Logistically, practically, and the urgent bloodthirst for revenge make this fucking hard to do. But this seems to me to be a pretty even keeled non polarizing take on a complex situation where there is justification for military action against a terrorist group, and that military action must be measured against the safety and needs of a civilian population.

      • night_of_knee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because Israel already occupies Gaza and other Palestinian areas.

        Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, where the hell are you getting your information?

        • Zoolander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Israel still controls all traffic, imports, utilities, and ingress/egress from the area (if it didn’t, they wouldn’t have been able to cut off power, water, and aid). Israel “withdrawing from Gaza” doesn’t really mean much unless Gaza has elected representation and can sustain itself.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not an even take, because he has not proposed taking out the extremists in Israel.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not comparable. Israel is an ally, and needs our funding. Russia has been an advocacy or “enemy of my enemy” type more or less for a hundred years

  • DreBeast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    The US is sending mix signals. Biden condemns Hamas, calls them terrorists, and funds the iron dome. Of course Israel thinks they have carte blanche in the region. Surrounded by hostile nations, what other nations in the world acts as aggressive as Israel. They do it because they know they have the full backing of the US. The question is will we live in a world without any Palestinians in the middle east soon - coz that’s where we’re headed.

    Israel misspelled their defense system. Should be called the irony dome.

    • Dubito_Cogito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree with you. But I’d like to add this. I live in Israel at the moment, I’m not Israeli but I moved here for my job. I live in a pretty safe area, but we still had rockets coming from Gaza and from up north Hezbolla. They were explicitly targeting civilian areas. But iron Dome and the other system, David something intercepted it. Perspective on life changes when you see a flying missile heading your way only to get intercepted by these systems. The area where I live is full of Arabs, Jews, immigrant from Eastern Europe etc. and had several pro-palastine rallies in the past couple of days, and I stand with them. Also, There have been at least 5 to 6 Hamas strikes every hour since last week, they are targeting everywhere around Israel and iron Dome is on full protection.

      I just wanted to add, I don’t know what for…

      • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I imagine your perspective also changes if the missiles were landing and killing people, innocent civilians all around you, your house, hospitals, etc. That’s what it’s like for the people in Gaza. It also looks pretty suspicious when there’s lots of immigrants in Israel and mostly Palestinians in a separate cordoned off area (kinda like an apartheid state).

        • Dubito_Cogito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There are quite a lot of palastinians here mate. You should really visit Palestine when you get a chance… the amount of people chanting death to the Jews is kind of absurd.

          Please try and check out some telegram groups or sites like Funker etc for leaked footage. Hamas holds them hostage during the knock-off alert. IDF doesn’t target civilians explicitly. The nuances of this war are a bit deeper than what we can convey in text here.

          Also see that Israel has asylum for gay/trans people fleeing Palestine or middle east. My point being, Israel does try to be as humane as possible in this war, but some horror stories about Hamas (and other terrorist organisations) are really depraved.

          I support peace. That is all. No more bloodshed.

          Edit: I forgot to add this… when I said perspective, I’m talking about perspective on life. Not in this war or religion or anything else. Just living and life in general

          • Zoolander@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Israel does try to be as humane as possible in this war

            How can you possibly say this when the number of people Israel has killed dwarfs the number of people killed by any Palestinian terrorist group, Hamas or otherwise?

            I support peace too but one side of this equation is tipped so far that it’s hard for me to take anyone seriously that claims Israel’s goals are anywhere near the vicinity of “peaceful” or “humane”.

            That being said… stay safe. I can’t imagine the situation you’re in.

          • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, ya, there’s a lot of Palestinians there. That’s because Israel took their land. There’s also a lot of black people in South Africa, even during apartheid, too. But tons of them were still pushed off their homes into tiny strips of land in Gaza and the West Bank, so now the majority are in those other places. The same thing happened to the natives in the US.

            IDF don’t target civilians explicitly but they also don’t seem to care about them. They’ve killed thousands more civilians than Hamas has with the barest of excuses, all to find Hamas not really caring about collateral. That’s what happens when you drop bombs all over the place. And the fear and terror and horrible quality of life causes things like Hamas. Hamas sucks, I’m sure they would kill more if they could, but Israel has the power in this relationship. When non-violent protests lead to killed or getting your knees blown off, or to nothing at all (like most protests for Palestinians have been for the last near century), when there’s no hope or chance of growth, the average is 18 and you’re probably never going to grow old or successful, then people turn to monsters like Hamas.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you for adding it. It boils down to regular people being hurt, and as an outsider I feel helpless because there doesn’t seem to be a good solution, just less bad ones.

    • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now that it’s been a week since Hamas attacked, there’s all these stories coming out about how the IDF didn’t even respond to the attack for an hour, and how many friendly fire incidents keep happening, and how incompetent the ground troops are in general. The certainty in their military might is completely gone and now there’s no telling what could happen. Western allies have basically given them carte blanch approval for genocide and now some of them aren’t so certain.

  • can@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    But he said he was convinced that “the Israelis are going to do everything in their power to avoid the killing of innocent civilians.”

      • Orbituary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        And yet nobody has ever shown pictures or evidence that they do that. We hear about it constantly, but not one photo to back it up in a world of pocket cameras.

        Hamas are a fucking blight, but I’m tired of the same god damned excuses for Israel’s bad behavior. Fuck the IDF. Fuck Hamas. Fuck the whole lot assholes who put innocents in danger.

        Civilians, Israeli or Palestinian, should not be pawns. The one immutable fact is, only one side here has any real power.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        operating a military HQ bunker under a hospital is a warcrime in and of itself, it also makes it a legitimate war target.

        Even if this were true, by International Humanitarian Law it does not make it a legitimate war target. One side committing war crimes is never carte blanche for the opposing side to also commit war crimes.

        An example, just because Russian soldiers raped little kids in Bucha does not magically allow the Ukrainians to bomb hospital or to execute non-combatants. IHL intents explicitly to avoid tit for tat. Remember that the Russians also justify bombing hospitals and civilian residential buildings by accusing Ukrainians of using them as human shields.

      • UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Its crazy to me the amount of support HAMAS is getting by random people on the internet.

        Yes, Isreal has done terrible things, but you have to compare it to what their enemies are doing and would do in their place. HAMAS attacked civilians on purpose, executed babies and elderly. Kidnaped, tortured, and raped. Desicrated bodies, dragging them behind vehicles while cheering. Went door to door executing entire villages.

        If roles were reversed, HAMAS would flatten the gaza strip. They wouldn’t give two thoughts about civilians.

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or maybe we’re capable of condemning both! “You have to compare it to what their enemies are doing” hints that you arent. Isreal on the state and military levels is abhorrent shit, AND so is Hamas. One of them being garbage monsters doesnt stop the other one from being

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Israeli bombing leveled entire villages in Gaza and the West Bank on the first night after the attack, over 300 children were killed in just that night. They’ve destroyed numerous apartment blocks, hospitals, schools with airstrikes. They struck a convoy of refugees on a road specifically designated as a safe route for evacuation, killing 70 people in one strike, mostly women and children.

          It doesn’t matter what occurred before this, to point out the atrocities still on-going doesn’t mean you are a supporter of Hamas, and within Palestine there are several militant and other political groups. To support Palestine doesn’t mean you support Hamas or terrorism.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s funny how the IDF just classifies hospitals, apartments, UN camps, and schools as military targets and you don’t ask any questions. Just how many HQs does Hamas have?

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It certainly does more than Hama’s ever did.

        Normally? Yeah I guess.

        Now? No way. People have been bombed while evacuating to supposed safe locations or along safe routes. Like many times.

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israeli bombing leveled entire villages in Gaza and the West Bank on the first night after the attack, over 300 children were killed in just that night. They’ve destroyed numerous apartment blocks, hospitals, schools with airstrikes. They struck a convoy of refugees on a road specifically designated as a safe route for evacuation, killing 70 people in one strike, mostly women and children.

    • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure if you skew the definition of occupy enough, or can’t distinguish between Gaza and the West Bank, because all you know is propaganda.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        Go look at a map of the UN borders. Then look at a map of where Israeli troops are

        Now come back here and say that again with a straight face.

        • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay I will. Israel pulled out of Gaza to let them have their independence and self govern, they elected a terrorist organization to run the place. Israel has not governed Gaza since then, nor has is occupied the territory. If you want to spread misinformation, at least pick something you know anything about.

            • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can’t even tell the difference between West Bank and Gaza, just grouping them into Palestine. Seriously, go educate yourself before regurgitating propaganda.

          • Zoolander@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Israel pulled out of Gaza to let them have their independence and self govern, they elected a terrorist organization to run the place. Israel has not governed Gaza since then, nor has is occupied the territory.

            This is only true under a definition that is entirely biased towards Israel. Israel funded the elections in question, which were held over 18 years ago (long enough to where the average Palestinian *wasn’t even born yet much less had the right or ability to vote), and controls all food, water, supplies, utilities, and ingress/egress into the area. That is not “let[ting] them have their independence and self-govern”.

      • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel already controls every aspect of life in Gaza. They ration how much food and water they allow in, to keep them near starvation.