The classic “OK boomer” still gets them angry, if that’s what you’re after
This is right, where every other comment in this thread is wrong.
Don’t take the bait.
Even just a flat OK is better than taking the bait. Honestly, silence is better.
Do you care? Then you are poor and mad.
Ah unimpressed ok is probably the best response.
Sarcastic “cool” works even better.
Pretty sure no one is replying seriously.
Well “ok boomer” is just replying with another rage bait
Yeah, bait for them. The point is to make them more mad than you are, that’s how you damage their social reputation.
They can hit you with the “you’re cringe” and then your reputation is damaged
“No U” - reputation saved
The oldest trick in the book
There’s still the uno reverse picture. So many counters! Exciting!
I don’t know if you’re being serious or not.
You’ve got to follow the pulse of the crowd. “You’re cringe” either sounds like the final blow to a shaky-legged cringe lord, or the last gasp of air from a voice-cracking, 14-year-old tough guy, depending on who the crowd is already inclined to agree with and possibly on whether they know what a floppy drive is.
The bottom line, though, is if you can get the crowd to cheer, then you can get other people to cheer.
LMFAO
All these comments are trying too hard. The only two options are “OK?” and “that watch?”
Verbose disses only work in rap
Alternatively, “And it’s a very nice watch.” Bonus points for riding the line between nonchalance and condescension while still being a compliment.
Ho I have the same one. That the only one you have?
“Interesting, may I see?” And when they hold their wrist up to you, inspect it closely, then lick it, make some faces like a wine connoisseur, shake your head and say :“It’s fake” turn around and disengage.
Heh, amateur hour. Let me show you my watch.
The 3rd feature really convinced me
“I don’t have a car”
Or maybe double down: “I live in my car.”
Do you say shit like that because nobody can tell the difference between your watch and a cheap one?
Holds up wrist sporting a Casio F-91W “Al-Qaida”
Big deal… This watch also costs more than my car.
Sounds like you got ripped off
Nooo bro it increases in value bro I’m investing in watches bro
But it’s gone up $200 since I bought it in 2014!
“So?”
That’s the response you want. Complete andutter boredom. You don’t care. Their entire personality is built around a weird little status structure and if you don’t buy into their hallucination they lose their everloving minds
“Ok” is my go-to. It feels dismissive because it is.
If you need to point out the watch and explain its value, you’ve already lost.
“Okay?”
I am not a friend of clever comebacks. People who point these things out are pathetic and people who get triggered by that only slightly less so.
“Well, the jerk store called, and they’re running out of you!”
“What’s the difference? You’re their all-time bestseller!”
“Oh yeah?! Well… I slept with your wife!”
“His wife is in a coma”
awesome :D
The life support machine called…
I also choose this guys wife
Why the fuck would I drive a watch ?
You see this? This is called a “smart phone.” Not only will this tell me the time like your watch, but it can also do a bunch of other things. I can look at pictures of raccoons wearing silly hats or I can use it to insult someone on the other side of the planet. It also cost a fraction of what your watch cost. I’m sorry to tell you this, but I think it should go and get your money back. It sounds like you’ve been scammed. As a matter of fact, let me give you my friend’s phone number. He’s an accountant, and I think he’ll be able to help stop you from making stupid purchases in the future.
Not only will this tell me the time like your watch
No. A cheap $100 phone is way more reliable than the most expensive Rolex thanks to NTP.
If you’re an astute collector, fine watches are (like art) a solid form of investment.
Prove me wrong: Fine art is a money laundering scheme.
You get some guy who went to art school to slosh some house paint on a sheet. You then hire a white woman who dresses like Malian royalty to come describe it in contradictory adjectives “It’s subtle, yet bold” while her gay sidekick in a turtleneck flamboyantly slaps his face and gasps. Sell $20 worth of cotton and $30 worth of Valspar for $3.247 million, and you’ve just successfully covered up the sale of 94 more brown women.
Prove me wrong: Fine art is a money laundering scheme.
Why would I try when it is a fact? I would caveat that fine art “can be” a money laundering scheme (quite easily). It isn’t always a money laundering scheme.
“that’s a lot of money for such an ugly watch.”
