• max_dryzen@mander.xyz
    1·
    6 hours ago

    Passengers (2016) is a shit film with an excellent premise but I never think about it, in fact it reminds me of its opposite, a superb film with a ridiculous premise called Sunshine (2007)

  • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
    2·
    10 hours ago

    The punisher 2004. It’s fun.

    Battlefield Earth. It’s a get drunk and veg kinda movie for me. It fucking sucks. But I like it.

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.netEnglish
    4·
    13 hours ago

    Not a film, but a novel:

    Starflight 3000 by R.W. Mackelworth

    If I remember, it was about this asteroid called “The Biosphere” that got hollowed out and sent on relativistic speeds through deep space to seed other solar systems with human colonies. The inside of it was set up like a giant rural town with massive skies, and a foot print the size of New York. And that’s a cool ass premise.

    But the book was so fucking milquetoast and bland. I could not tell you anything about the protagonist, their challenges, or anything.

  • ninth_plane@lemmy.world
    5·
    17 hours ago

    Mortal Kombat (2021) opened with a great “feudal China with elemental magic” clan story that could have been an amazing movie, but then they jumped forward in time and everything after that was a let down.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    20·
    23 hours ago

    Lucy

    It’s entertaining as all hell. It doesn’t pretend to be anything more, so I don’t understand the hate it gets. Just turn off your brain, and have some fun. It’s not supposed to be hard sci-fi.

  • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    19·
    23 hours ago

    Jurassic World. Just give me 90 minutes of dino mutants fighting, I don’t give a shit about Chris Pratt nor some random kids.

    • JackbyDev@programming.devEnglish
      4·
      10 hours ago

      I feel like it would’ve been a little better if they held off on the reveal that it was staged for a bit, but it’s been ages since I’ve seen it. I remember enjoying it though.

    • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
      11·
      18 hours ago

      Cabin in the Woods is fine art.

      10/10 Premise 10/10 Execution

      I’m helping my teenager get through all the horror tropes so we can watch Cabin in the Woods together.

    • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
      6·
      24 hours ago

      100% agree. It’s a fine twist on the subgenre, but the twist introduces an idea that begs to be expanded upon as part of a larger, cross-subgenre arc. And yet we only get a sliver and then it’s done.

      My hot take is that Joss Whedon’s writing is like JJ Abrams’: perfect premises with bad sense of follow-thru, so all their work gets the Netflix “over before it’s satisfyingly concluded” treatment

      • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
        4·
        22 hours ago

        I feel like everything was explained. I’m not left with any lingering questions about why or how any of it happened

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        2·
        20 hours ago

        That’s a great point. It would be fun to see a G rated fantasy film that happens to exactly follow the rules to be a Cabin in the Woods prequel.

        (Same enforcement of common tropes from much happier genres, but implying that the underlying reason is the same…)

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    14·
    1 day ago

    CATS

    Cats is not a complicated musical. All they had to do was animate it and get actual voice actors/singers. I’ve seen sketches for what I think was a Tim Burton sketch, and that would have been a million times better. I don’t know who looked at Cat’s and was like, “Yup, we need CGI.” It looks horrendous and sounds bad more often than not. The musical is already pretty out there, how much more fun would that movie had been if we had animators working on it. The creative visuals, colors, motifs. Not to mention a cat is a wonderfully complex animal to animate just because of how they move. That movie could have been a visual delight in part with the Spiderman movies if they let it, but noooooo. Let’s make a nightmare.

  • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
    18·
    1 day ago

    I agree with all the other people in this thread mentioning ‘In Time’. It had such a great premise, and I didn’t even hate the execution, but it was mediocre. It was like they went 50% of the way to a flawless execution and just said “fuck it, that’s good enough”. The concept has a lot of elements to explore, like classism, labor exploitation, human rights, even free will to a point… A movie just isn’t the right vehicle for that story. It needs to be a series. Done right, you could explore all that while having an overarching plotline, and still have your weekly subplots and B stories. That would give the story time to fully develop the romantic connection between the poor guy who comes into a bunch of time, and the rich girl who empathizes with him. That romance felt incredibly rushed in the movie, but you could build it up over a whole season in a show.

    I also want to mention another movie that I’m not sure belongs here. It’s not a bad movie, nor do I think the execution was mediocre, but for the life of me I can’t figure out why it didn’t do better. That movie is called ‘Push’, with Chris Evans and Dakota Fanning. I just watched it again the other night, and I freaking love it. The concept isn’t that amazing or original, but the way they present it is great. There isn’t a ton of exposition or world-building. They kinda just drop you in and let you figure it out, and I really like that. Evans and Fanning have great onscreen chemistry, and Djimon Honsou is a perfect bad guy. This is another one where I think it would make a great series, even though I think the movie was done really well. It’s just kind of a perfect mid-budget sci-fi action movie, and we don’t seem to get those anymore.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      3·
      18 hours ago

      I thought “In Time” was a good movie. I agree that there is a lot that could be done with it, however only so much can be done in a movie. This sort of concept really lends itself to multiple movies or a series (just don’t drag it out too long).

      • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
        2·
        16 hours ago

        5 seasons. No more, no less. It gives the overarching story enough room to breathe and play out a solid three act structure with a wide middle. It needs to all be written and plotted out before anything gets filmed.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    13·
    1 day ago

    The original Purge. I thought all the background stuff and setting were super interesting, but the film itself was a generic home invasion movie. The sequel expanded on all the stuff I was interested in, though.

    • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
      5·
      1 day ago

      The sequels really explored the idea with impressive worldbuilding. I admit the first one was more a horror flick, but the others were definitely digging deep into social commentary

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        4·
        23 hours ago

        Yeah, it wasn’t even that the first one was bad, it’s just that all the things they mentioned in passing, like the New Founding Fathers and the exemptions for Level 10 Government Officials, were building a world that sounded super interesting. Then we got saddle with some boring rich family for 90 minutes. I only got around to seeing the first sequel, but it delivered on all the stuff I wanted to see after I heard that first announcement.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            2·
            16 hours ago

            I’ll be honest, I find that guy super annoying, but I appreciate you sharing it with me. It definitely makes me feel validated that someone else felt the same way

            • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
              2·
              8 hours ago

              Oh I hate him too, and his needlessly pipsqueak voice and the stark unenthusiasm when reading out charity donations.

              But his analyses can be pretty decent

  • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    16·
    1 day ago

    Madam Web. The premise of your perception being un-stuck in time and the ramifications that has for your psyche is really cool. What’s not cool is hiring bad writers and nepo baby actresses to portray that story

    • JackbyDev@programming.devEnglish
      1·
      10 hours ago

      Different thought so I’m leaving a second comment. For whatever reason I thought We Live In Time had this premise for like a third of the movie. In hindsight I don’t really know why I did. I think it’s because Andrew Garfield’s character took notes and seemed flustered at times? I suppose I thought this was him trying to keep things straight in his brain? No. It’s just a normal story told in a noninear fashion. I loved it though.

      Major end spoilers

      What sucked is that it was about losing a loved on to cancer. We did not know this going in and out partner lost their mother to cancer a few years ago. So it hit REALLY fucking hard. There’s even a line Pugh says that’s something like “I don’t wanna some kid who’s just gonna have a dead mom because of cancer.” Great movie. Bring tissues.