• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    dude had already swallowed the tech bs, thinks ai is the furthest advancement of technology when it can’t compete with ancient tech. literally can’t do what a calculator can do reliably. or a timer. or a calendar.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      Please let’s try to keep generative AI from claiming the entire word “AI”.
      Current generative AI is good at and built for mimicking patterns with boundary conditions.
      This means it does a decent job of imitating authoritative knowledge, but it’s just mimicking it.
      People are hyped for it because it looks knowledgeable, it’s relatively simple to make, and a lot of what we do is text based so it’s easy to apply.

      There are a lot of other types of AI, the majority even, that work significantly better, take a small fraction of the computing power and provide helpful and meaningful results. They just don’t look like anything other than complex math, which is all any of them are in the end.

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      A calculator, timer or calendar can’t help me write an essay. You are comparing tools meant for different tasks. At least build your argumentets on something reasonable.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 days ago

        Take an English class you illiterate gremlin.

        Resource intense auto correct that does not understand the information it’s stringing together should not be used to write anything academically or professionally.

        • uranibaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          If you don’t want to use all the tools at your desposal, that’s your choice. If I had a tool that could help me formulate my text into the proper tense and help me use words most suited for a academic setting, why should I not use it? Did you know that writing a paper is part of university stuides, English major or not?

          Or do you not understand how to use an LLM? Do you think that one just prompts it and use whatever it produces? That is just as stupid as entering random number into a calculator, excpect it to calculate what you wanted and then say ”caluclators are bad because it gave the wrong answer”.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 days ago

        Why argue with someone who isn’t intelligent enough to write their essays without mechanical assistance?

        • uranibaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I want a more diverse discussion about LLM and AI, not the default ”AI bad” response that is so common here. :(

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Then stop dismissing other people’s “argumentets”. Unfortunately, most AI proponents don’t realize that the AI use case that is being pushed by it’s makers and owners is not “a tool to assist users”, but “a tool for executives to replace humans”. Is it a dumb proposal? absolutely. It doesn’t reduce the moral responsibility of those promoting AI. They are supporting the destruction of people’s livelihoods to make the wealthiest human being in history slightly wealthier, and curse knowledge workers to poverty just like factory workers were in their time by the exact same political and economic class of soulless pricks.

            • uranibaba@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              If the argument want as you have laid it out, I would not dismiss it. But I cannot do that when the arguemnt is ”hammers in general are bad because I cannot use them to drive to work” or ”also your essay fucking sucks. learn to put together a coherent thought instead of relying on a glorified autocorrect that doesn’t have them at all to do it for you”. That second one is an actual quote.

              What you bring up is how a few people is power are using AI to increase their wealth without regards for human suffering. I agree that what they are doing is wrong. And the discussion should be about how AI affects our society, how it is used and who controls it. This does not make AI a bad tool, it makes it a tool that can used in a bad way to cause a lot of harm.

              • dustyData@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                “If the argument want as you have laid it out, I would not dismiss it.”

                Your autocorrect software is failing you.

                What is your argument? It is OK for a few people to hurt others, since you personally are benefiting, in a very small way, from the cruelty? That’s a shit argument to make.

                If AI is “just a tool”, then how come it doesn’t do any of the things it is promised to do? The issue is not expecting “a hammer to drive to work”. The problem is that LLMs makers promised a car, you order one, and receive a screwdriver on the mail. Because “screwdrivers are just a tool, you can use it to assemble a car”. It’s a scam, it is fraud, it is lying and stealing from others to capitalize on bad tech.

                If AI is just a tool, its an unethical and immoral tool.

                • uranibaba@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  I’m trying to say that one should call a fraud a fraud, not a bad screwdriver.
                  You want to have a discussion about the fraud? Don’t say that screwdriver suck, say that it did not do what is was advertised to do.

                  It is OK for a few people to hurt others, since you personally are benefiting, in a very small way, from the cruelty?

                  That is not what I tried to say.

        • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I wonder why anyone would want an “AI girlfriend” or whatever ridiculous thing tech bros are trying to shoehorn monetization into to capitalize on the pervasive disconnect in society today.

          And then, when I read a post like yours, referring to someone like that, it all suddenly makes sense. Given the choice, I’d also rather spend time with unthinking silicon than an asshole who talks to people like you do.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 days ago

        funny how it’s not “intelligent” enough to say “hey I don’t really do math” and instead feeds me bullshit that I have to correct and then it’ll say “oh yeah totally right sorry here’s the actual answer that I wouldn’t have given if you hadn’t corrected me as the one who asked the question”

        also your essay fucking sucks. learn to put together a coherent thought instead of relying on a glorified autocorrect that doesn’t have them at all to do it for you.

        • uranibaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          funny how it’s not “intelligent” enough to say “hey I don’t really do math”

          From what I understand, that is how OpenAI has decided to make their LLM and not an inherit property of LLMs, but I could you be wrong.

          also your essay fucking sucks

          Did you read it?

          learn to put together a coherent thought instead of relying on a glorified autocorrect that doesn’t have them at all to do it for you.

          I’ll take a guess here. You think I had the LLM write my essey for me. You also think I used it to correct my spelling.
          I already have other software that can help me with my spelling, so that was not needed. I wrote my whole essey first, because actually doing myself is faster and gives a better result than trying to prompt an AI to do it, at least for me.

          What I did do was feed my text into an LLM to see how I could improve the structure of my text, how tense could be used correctly and if any words that I used could be changed for a better substitute. All of those are things that I could do myself, but I had an excellent tool to help me with it so I used it.

          Not using it would be just as stupid as not using a software to correct spelling becuase it might get the spelling wrong.

          I think you do not understand how to get the most out of an LLM or you are using it wrong. Or both.

    • TheBloodFarts@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Veritasium has an awesome video about the Japanese scientist that discovered blue LEDs, guy basically did it single handedly despite pushback from his boss. Absolutely insane scientific achievement

  • Panamalt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    4 days ago

    Japan still generally places more emphasis on quality over shitting out shiny new, overpriced garbage as fast as possible

  • hobovision@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    4 days ago

    The idea that Japan was ever more technologically advanced than the US is a tough argument to make. Perhaps they had better consumer and transportation technologies, but the US led the world in nearly all other forms of technology (see silicon valley, NASA, US defense technology, etc). It’s cool the hate on the US but there’s a reason it was the world super power for decades. It’s too bad it’s turning into an anti-science christo-facist kelptocracy.

    • shikitohno@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think it’s mostly that they did way better than the US in terms of making many consumer technology products widely available at a higher quality and better cost than the US did. Like, Japanese brands were huge for televisions, audio equipment and similar goods. I can think of several that were the go to brands for TVs when I was growing up, but I can’t think of a single US-based manufacturer, even a crappy one.

      They also did way better in terms of building out internet access and public transport than the US has done.

      It might only be within a few limited sectors, but when those sectors account for the vast majority of peoples’ interactions with technology, it’s going to have a far greater impact on their perceptions of relative advancement.

      Also, in the pre-internet days, it probably helped that non-Japanese people largely didn’t see all the ways that Japan can be an extremely conservative country, like their reliance on fax machines long after pretty much every other country with the means to do so had almost entirely left them behind as obsolete.

      • A7thStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        RCA, Westinghouse, and Zenith used to be big American TV manufacturers. Westinghouse and zenith were the cheaper brands, but RCA used to make some high end models.

        • shikitohno@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          I mean, I know there had to have been some, but 2/3 of those are out of business and weren’t competitive with their Japanese rivals, while Zenith’s most recent “notable product” on Wikipedia dates from the 1970s and has been a subsidiary of a Korean company for nearly 30 years.

      • Surp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        You go back far enough and you’ll find every country did horrible things or stolelands or killed half their citizens etc.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The tech for silicon valley comes from Asia. You literally couldn’t build a chip factory in the US right now, the know-how doesn’t exist there anymore.
      So the US is leading the world in writing code and building long tubes spewing hot gas out of one end.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      to be fair it’s always been a kleptocracy. literally founded on stolen land, with stolen labor. even after emancipation it kept the stolen labor tradition alive til now with increasing intensity.

        • shawn1122@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Sure but the scale and recency of European colonialism certainly leaves a bad taste in many people’s mouths, even the descendants of colonists.

          Many are also put off by European and its new world colony’s claims of moral supremacy over those victimized by colonization, especially as it was the birthplace of nazi-ism and countless genocides.

          We can all agree thar humans have been nafarious for a long time. But, many see the legacy of European colonialism and the Trans Atlantic slave trade as an atrocity at a scale never before commited in human history.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          different degrees, but yeah pretty much all land has been taken by force. still is. the difference is how though.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    145
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The US isn’t innovating jack shit.

    The US just created a massively polarized and unequal society so that when a country creates a new brilliant researcher or innovation, an American company can buy them out.

    Basically, the insane poverty and lack of government services that the average American experiences gives them enough cash to buy up innovative people, companies, and competitors.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      5 days ago

      Also the post-WW2 world order heavily favours their economy.

      Their allies buy their debt, and their weapons. They give access to theiir markets to US companies, and support US wars around the world. They invest in the US economy in an unbalanced way that favours the US economy.

      And all of this was in exchange for US security.

    • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      Innovate people, companies, and competitors

      And quickly turn them complacent. I work at a Japanese company, and the amount of times I see an amazing Japanese expat turn into a busybody is insane. We have crafted the perfect “fuck your idea just do your job” culture

  • diverging@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 days ago

    Doc: “No wonder this circuit failed; it says ‘Made in Japan’.”
    Marty: “What do you mean, Doc? All the best stuff is made in Japan.”

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    5 days ago

    Economics Explained has an interesting video on the topic. After WWII, Japan became the first country in Asia to undergo an industrial revolution and soon became the second largest economy after the US and was by many accounts set to match or even overtake the US. They then suffered an economic collapse due to unchecked growth and speculative markets and decided to never again speculate on the future and just stick to tried and true methods.

    Since the 1990s, Japan’s economy has barely changed while other nations have seen huge growth. You’d assume that would mean Japan is now far behind, but they aren’t. They seem to have mastered keeping everything the same for decades without the normal decline that comes with it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      After WWII, Japan became the first country in Asia to undergo an industrial revolution

      After WW2? Industrialization during the 20s/30s was the whole reason they attempted to conqueror the Oceanic island states and the Chinese/Korean/Indochinese mainland.

      They then suffered an economic collapse due to unchecked growth and speculative markets and decided to never again speculate on the future and just stick to tried and true methods.

      The Japanese Economy was undone by The Plaza Accord and The Louvre Accord, which western nations used to devalue their currency and undermine Japanese export prices. The downturn, followed by a financialized corporate consolidation and expropriation of revenues through foreign investment, permanently crippled the Japanese economy in the aftermath of the 90s Asian recession.

      What sets countries like Japan, Korea, and the Philippines apart from China is the domestic control of their industries. Their markets are dominated by private equity and fixated on steady profit margins rather than long term public investments. Consequently, the capital cities are flooded with cash and industrial development while the rural areas are devoid of commerce. There’s no shortage of speculation, but its rooted in the private equity markets and focused largely on fictitious capital - debt instruments and their derivatives - rather than real capital or technology.

      Chinese investment in the periphery and its rising tide of middle class wage earners is what propels them into the 21st century. They’re the ones building out new transit lines, new public housing projects, new universities, and blue sky research. The Xi Government is openly hostile to speculative investment, doesn’t bother to bail out failing financial institutions, and focuses primarily on expansion of utilities, trade corridors, and mixed us developments.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Honestly, sounds great to me. I know they’ve had “issues” (is it really an issue for me if my money becomes more valuable?) with deflation, but I’d be OK with that if it meant no more speculation.

      • Fredthefishlord
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        I hate inflation based economics. So ngl, japan seems really nice in that regard

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I spend at least a month in Japan every year and the tech there is great for the most part. All of the critical parts infrastructure tech is brilliant and incredibly stable.

      The lack of risk taking is very noticeable though especially when it comes to contemporary software and UX. There just so much broken tech because everything moves so slowly - for example to pick up a reserved train tickets you need to bring the same physical card you made you payment with and thats the only way. So if you used a virtual card or forgot your card at home you’re screwed.

    • weker01@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      You seem to be implying an argument based on Modus tollens:

      1. If AI is the chief US innovation, then the US is massively fucked.
      2. The US is not massively fucked.
      3. Ergo, AI is not the chief US innovation.

      Well I disagree with the premise 2:

      The US is massively fucked.

      With that, no conclusion can be gained from premise 1.

    • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      No, AI is one of the chief innovations which is a huge money maker. Don’t forget the US still dominates the enterprise server market which is worth trillions. Processors and GPUs are still designed and some manufactured here. Innovation comes in all shapes and sizes, AI is just the latest buzz.

  • HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t exactly keep up with the technological innovations of every country, but I get the feeling it isn’t so much that Japan hasn’t innovated in decades, so much as they haven’t done anything he (it’s 4chan, let’s be frank, it’s a he) personally finds interesting or that is publicized in the medium he gets his news from.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    4 days ago

    Same thing that happens everywhere. Low cost innovation gets expensive as companies grow and salaries rise, profit seekers move to exploit cheaper labor elsewhere.

    • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      That still hasn’t happened in the US though. Hardware is produced overseas but a huge chunk of the most used software in the world is produced in the US. The chips are designed in the US, some produced here but most overseas. Does that only apply to manufacturing?

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Still hasn’t happened in the US? You choose a single industry as an indicator to base a claim on the state of US industry vs vast manufacturing losses the US has faced over the last 50 years?

        • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Whatever. If it’s Linux, Democrat, anti establishment, and anti US then it’s popular on Lemmy, got it. Lemmy feels more and more like it’s just a big group of edgy teenagers.