• tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      They’ll survive it, their markets and investments aren’t overvalued like ours are. They’ll crash, re-evaluate their societal priorities, and start to build again

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          I mean every society has to rebuild after a crash, I’m just optimistic that they’ll do it faster

                • jackeryjoo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Within 50 years, the whole world population is going to shrink dramatically, and it will have nothing to do with declining birth rates.

                  • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    That’s an interesting claim. Where are you getting that idea? Are you suggesting climate change will do this without decreasing birth rates?

                • tetris11@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Yeah, but that’s only a problem if elderly orderlies is an underpaid job that no one wants, and if people can’t afford to live on it when choosing such a profession.

                  If the economy adjusts or society adjusts such that caring for the elderly is a highly sought out and secure job that can easily pay a mortgage, what’s the issue?

                  This is what I mean when I say they will crash and their economy will adjust.

                  • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    There aren’t enough tax payers paying into the system to sustain the end of life care, retirement funds/pensions/social security equivalents that an elderly population that large. when you have a 1:1 ratio of people paying in vs paying out your assistance levels will be extremely weak.

                    No nation can sustain that large of an elder population. It’s not economically viable.

    • Cait
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’d require significant societal change to an environment where having children is actually manageable